Comparison of many-particle representations for selected-CI I: A tree based approach.

configuration interaction configuration interaction algorithms graphical unitary group adaptation selected CI spin adaptation

Journal

Journal of computational chemistry
ISSN: 1096-987X
Titre abrégé: J Comput Chem
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9878362

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 05 2021
Historique:
revised: 26 02 2021
received: 06 11 2020
accepted: 02 03 2021
pubmed: 26 3 2021
medline: 26 3 2021
entrez: 25 3 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The full configuration interaction (FCI) method is only applicable to small molecules with few electrons in moderate size basis sets. One of the main alternatives to obtain approximate FCI energies for bigger molecules and larger basis sets is selected CI. However, due to: (a) the lack of a well-defined structure in a selected CI Hamiltonian, (b) the potentially large number of electrons together with c) potentially large orbital spaces, a computationally and memory efficient algorithm is difficult to construct. In the present series of papers, we describe our attempts to address these issues by exploring tree-based approaches. At the same time, we devote special attention to the issue of obtaining eigenfunctions of the total spin squared operator since this is of particular importance in tackling magnetic properties of complex open shell systems. Dedicated algorithms are designed to tackle the CI problem in terms of determinant, configuration (CFG) and configuration state function many-particle bases by effective use of the tree representation. In this paper we describe the underlying logic of our algorithm design and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the different many particle bases. We demonstrate by the use of small examples how the use of the tree simplifies many key algorithms required for the design of an efficient selected CI program. Our selected CI algorithm, called the iterative configuration expansion, is presented in the penultimate part. Finally, we discuss the limitations and scaling characteristics of the present approach.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33764585
doi: 10.1002/jcc.26518
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

982-1005

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Computational Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Références

J. Olsen, P. Jørgensen, J. Simons, Chem. Phys. Lett. 1990, 169, 463.
M. Klene, M. A. Robb, M. J. Frisch, P. Celani, J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 113(14), 5653.
Z. Gan, Y. Alexeev, M. S. Gordon, R. A. Kendall, J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 119(1), 47.
K. D. Vogiatzis, D. Ma, J. Olsen, L. Gagliardi, W. A. de Jong, J. Chem. Phys. 2017, 147(18), 184111.
S. Evangelisti, G. L. Bendazzoli, R. Ansaloni, E. Rossi, Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 233(4), 353.
S. Evangelisti, G. L. Bendazzoli, R. Ansaloni, F. Durì, E. Rossi, Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996, 252(5-6), 437.
N. B. Amor, S. Evangelisti, D. Maynau, E. Rossi, Chem. Phys. Lett. 1998, 288(2-4), 348.
W. A. de Jong, E. Bylaska, N. Govind, C. L. Janssen, K. Kowalski, T. Müller, I. M. B. Nielsen, H. J. J. van Dam, V. Veryazov, R. Lindh, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12(26), 6896.
O. Sinanoğlu, J. Chem. Phys. 1962, 36(3), 706.
J. Hinze, C. C. J. Roothaan, Progr. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 1967, 40, 37.
A. Pipano, I. Shavitt, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1968, 11(1), 90.
C. F. Bender, E. R. Davidson, Phys. Rev. 1969, 183(1), 23.
J. L. Whitten, M. Hackmeyer, J. Chem. Phys. 1969, 51(12), 5584.
B. Huron, J. P. Malrieu, P. Rancurel, J. Chem. Phys. 1973, 58(12), 5745.
R. J. Buenker, S. D. Peyerimhoff, Theor. Chim. Acta 1974, 35(1), 33.
R. J. Buenker, S. D. Peyerimhoff, Theor. Chim. Acta 1975, 39(3), 217.
M. Hanrath, B. Engels, Chem. Phys. 1997, 225(1-3), 197.
S. Grimme, J. Comput. Chem. 1994, 15(4), 424.
F. Neese, J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 119(18), 9428.
G. H. Booth, A. J. W. Thom, A. Alavi, J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 131(5), 054106.
D. Cleland, G. H. Booth, A. Alavi, J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132(4), 041103.
K. Guther, R. J. Anderson, N. S. Blunt, N. A. Bogdanov, D. Cleland, N. Dattani, W. Dobrautz, K. Ghanem, P. Jeszenszki, N. Liebermann, G. L. Manni, A. Y. Lozovoi, H. Luo, D. Ma, F. Merz, C. Overy, M. Rampp, P. K. Samanta, L. R. Schwarz, J. J. Shepherd, S. D. Smart, E. Vitale, O. Weser, G. H. Booth, A. Alavi, J. Chem. Phys. 2020, 153(3), 034107.
W. Dobrautz, S. D. Smart, A. Alavi, J. Chem. Phys. 2019, 151(9), 094104.
A. A. Holmes, N. M. Tubman, C. J. Umrigar, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016, 12(8), 3674.
S. Sharma, A. A. Holmes, G. Jeanmairet, A. Alavi, C. J. Umrigar, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2017, 13(4), 1595.
J. Li, M. Otten, A. A. Holmes, S. Sharma, C. J. Umrigar, J. Chem. Phys. 2018, 149(21), 214110.
Y. Garniron, A. Scemama, P.-F. Loos, M. Caffarel, J. Chem. Phys. 2017, 147(3), 034101.
P.-F. Loos, A. Scemama, A. Blondel, Y. Garniron, M. Caffarel, D. Jacquemin, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2018, 14(8), 4360.
A. Scemama, A. Benali, D. Jacquemin, M. Caffarel, P.-F. Loos, J. Chem. Phys. 2018, 149(3), 034108.
J. E. Deustua, J. Shen, P. Piecuch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 119, 223003.
J. E. Deustua, I. Magoulas, J. Shen, P. Piecuch, J. Chem. Phys. 2018, 149(15), 151101.
W. Liu, M. R. Hoffmann, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016, 12(3), 1169.
W. Liu, M. R. Hoffmann, Theor. Chem. Acc. 2014, 133(5), 1481.
E. Xu, M. Uejima, S. L. Ten-no, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018, 121(11), 113001.
J. J. Eriksen, J. Gauss, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2018, 14(10), 5180.
J. J. Eriksen, J. Gauss, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2019, 15(9), 4873.
J. J. Eriksen, J. Gauss, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2019, 10(24), 7910.
F. A. Evangelista, J. Chem. Phys. 2014, 141(5), 054109.
C. Li, F. A. Evangelista, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2015, 11(5), 2097.
C. Li, F. A. Evangelista, J. Chem. Phys. 2017, 146(2), 124132.
J. B. Schriber, K. P. Hannon, C. Li, F. A. Evangelista, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2018, 14(12), 6295.
K. T. Williams, Y. Yao, J. Li, L. Chen, H. Shi, M. Motta, C. Niu, U. Ray, S. Guo, R. J. Anderson, J. Li, L. N. Tran, C.-N. Yeh, B. Mussard, S. Sharma, F. Bruneval, M. van Schilfgaarde, G. H. Booth, G. K.-L. Chan, S. Zhang, E. Gull, D. Zgid, A. Millis, C. J. Umrigar, L. K. Wagner, Simons Collaboration on the Many-Electron Problem, Phys. Rev. X 2020, 10(1), 60.
J. J. Eriksen, T. A. Anderson, J. E. Deustua, K. Ghanem, D. Hait, M. R. Hoffmann, S. Lee, D. S. Levine, I. Magoulas, J. Shen, N. M. Tubman, K. B. Whaley, E. Xu, Y. Yao, N. Zhang, A. Alavi, G. K.-L. Chan, M. Head-Gordon, W. Liu, P. Piecuch, S. Sharma, S. L. Ten-no, C. J. Umrigar, J. Gauss, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11(20), 8922.
P. J. Knowles, N. C. Handy, Chem. Phys. Lett. 1984, 111(4-5), 315.
P. J. Knowles, N. C. Handy, Comput. Phys. Commun. 1989, 54(1), 75.
F. Neese, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci 2017, 8(1), e1327.
F. Neese, F. Wennmohs, U. Becker, C. Riplinger, J. Chem. Phys. 2020, 152(22), 224108.
F. Neese, Orca manual, https://www.cec.mpg.de/Forschung/ORCA/orca_manual_4_0_1.pdf, ORCA 4.0, 2017. (accessed November 2020)
R. Ghafarian Shirazi, F. Neese, D. A. Pantazis, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2018, 14(9), 4733.
V. G. Chilkuri, S. DeBeer, F. Neese, Inorg. Chem. 2019, 59, 984.
T. Woller, A. Banerjee, N. Sylvetsky, G. Santra, X. Deraet, F. De Proft, J. M. L. Martin, M. Alonso, J. Phys. Chem. A 2020, 124(12), 2380.
N. Sylvetsky, A. Banerjee, M. Alonso, J. M. L. Martin, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2020, 16(6), 3641.
T. Helgaker, P. Jørgensen, J. Olsen, Molecular Electronic-Structure Theory, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK 2000.
R. Pauncz, Spin Eigenfunctions, Springer US, Boston, MA 1979.
J. E. Grabenstetter, T. J. Tseng, F. Grein, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1976, 10(1), 143.
I. Shavitt, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1977, 12(S11), 131.
J. Paldus, J. Chem. Phys. 1974, 61(12), 5321.
J. Paldus, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1975, 9(S9), 165.
J. Paldus, Phys Rev A Gen Phys 1976, 14(5), 1620.
ACM Trans. Math. Software 2002, 28(2), 135.
D. M. Brink, G. R. Satchler, Angular Momentum, Clarendon Press, London, UK 1968.
I. L. Cooper, R. McWeeny, J. Chem. Phys. 1966, 45(1), 226.
B. T. Sutcliffe, J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 45(1), 235.
G. H. F. Diercksen, B. T. Sutcliffe, Theor. Chim. Acta 1974, 34(2), 105.
H. Weyl, The Classical Groups, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ 1946.
W. Duch, J. Karwowski, Comput. Phys. Rep. 1985, 47(1), 83.
G. W. F. Drake, M. Schlesinger, Phys. Rev. A Gen. Phys. 1977, 15(5), 1990.
R. D. Kent, M. Schlesinger, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1982, 22(2), 223.
S. Evangelisti, J.-P. Daudey, J. P. Malrieu, Chem. Phys. 1983, 75(1), 91.
P. S. Epstein, Phys. Rev. 1926, 28(4), 695.
R. K. Nesbet, Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 1955, 230(1182), 312.
À. Povill, J. Rubio, Theor. Chim. Acta 1995, 92(5), 305.
J. Paldus, in Theoretical Chemistry: Advances and Perspectives, Vol. 2 (Eds: H. Eyring, D. Henderson), Academic Press, New York 1976, p. 131.

Auteurs

Vijay Gopal Chilkuri (VG)

Max-Planck-Institut für Kohlenforschung, Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany.

Frank Neese (F)

Max-Planck-Institut für Kohlenforschung, Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany.

Classifications MeSH