Understanding disadvantaged adolescents' perception of health literacy through a systematic development of peer vignettes.
Intervention
Participatory research
Youth-centered
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 03 2021
25 03 2021
Historique:
received:
27
11
2020
accepted:
15
03
2021
entrez:
26
3
2021
pubmed:
27
3
2021
medline:
22
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Adolescence represents a crucial phase of life where health behaviours, attitudes and social determinants can have lasting impacts on health quality across the life course. Unhealthy behaviour in young people is generally more common in low socioeconomic groups. Nevertheless, all adolescents should have a fair opportunity to attain their full health potential. Health literacy is positioned as a potential mediating factor to improve health, but research regarding health literacy in adolescents and socially disadvantaged populations is limited. As part of Phase one of the Ophelia (OPtimising HEalth LIterAcy) framework, The purpose of this study was to explore the perceptions of socially disadvantaged Irish adolescents in relation to health literacy and related behaviours, and utilise this data to develop relevant vignettes. A convergent mixed method design was used to co-create the vignettes. Questionnaires were completed by 962 adolescents (males n = 553, females n = 409, Mean age = 13.97 ± 0.96 years) from five participating disadvantaged schools in Leinster, Ireland. Focus groups were also conducted in each school (n = 31). Results were synthesised using cluster and thematic analysis, to develop nine vignettes that represented typical male and female subgroups across the schools with varying health literacy profiles. These vignettes were then validated through triangular consensus with students, teachers, and researchers. The co-creation process was a participatory methodology which promoted the engagement and autonomy of the young people involved in the project. The vignettes themselves provide an authentic and tangible description of the health issues and health literacy profiles of adolescents in this context. Application of these vignettes in workshops involving students and teachers, will enable meaningful engagement in the discussion of health literacy and health-related behaviours in Irish young people, and the potential co-designing of strategies to address health literacy in youth. As guided by the Ophelia framework, the use of authentic, interactive and participatory research methods, such as the co-creation of vignettes, is particularly important in groups that are underserved by traditional research methods. The approach used in this study could be adapted to other contexts to represent and understand stakeholders' perceptions of health, with a view to explore, and ultimately improve, health literacy.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Adolescence represents a crucial phase of life where health behaviours, attitudes and social determinants can have lasting impacts on health quality across the life course. Unhealthy behaviour in young people is generally more common in low socioeconomic groups. Nevertheless, all adolescents should have a fair opportunity to attain their full health potential. Health literacy is positioned as a potential mediating factor to improve health, but research regarding health literacy in adolescents and socially disadvantaged populations is limited. As part of Phase one of the Ophelia (OPtimising HEalth LIterAcy) framework, The purpose of this study was to explore the perceptions of socially disadvantaged Irish adolescents in relation to health literacy and related behaviours, and utilise this data to develop relevant vignettes.
METHODS
A convergent mixed method design was used to co-create the vignettes. Questionnaires were completed by 962 adolescents (males n = 553, females n = 409, Mean age = 13.97 ± 0.96 years) from five participating disadvantaged schools in Leinster, Ireland. Focus groups were also conducted in each school (n = 31). Results were synthesised using cluster and thematic analysis, to develop nine vignettes that represented typical male and female subgroups across the schools with varying health literacy profiles. These vignettes were then validated through triangular consensus with students, teachers, and researchers.
DISCUSSION
The co-creation process was a participatory methodology which promoted the engagement and autonomy of the young people involved in the project. The vignettes themselves provide an authentic and tangible description of the health issues and health literacy profiles of adolescents in this context. Application of these vignettes in workshops involving students and teachers, will enable meaningful engagement in the discussion of health literacy and health-related behaviours in Irish young people, and the potential co-designing of strategies to address health literacy in youth.
CONCLUSION
As guided by the Ophelia framework, the use of authentic, interactive and participatory research methods, such as the co-creation of vignettes, is particularly important in groups that are underserved by traditional research methods. The approach used in this study could be adapted to other contexts to represent and understand stakeholders' perceptions of health, with a view to explore, and ultimately improve, health literacy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33765994
doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10634-x
pii: 10.1186/s12889-021-10634-x
pmc: PMC7992854
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
593Références
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Apr 27;17(1):309
pubmed: 28449680
Int J Pediatr Obes. 2009;4(4):299-305
pubmed: 19922045
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 24;17(4):
pubmed: 32102271
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 26;16(5):
pubmed: 30813530
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 14;16(18):
pubmed: 31540040
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 21;17(8):
pubmed: 32326285
BMC Public Health. 2016 Nov 9;16(1):1150
pubmed: 27829397
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 23;14(12):e0227007
pubmed: 31869381
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 20;18(1):989
pubmed: 30572887
Public Health. 2016 Mar;132:3-12
pubmed: 26872738
Qual Health Res. 2015 Oct;25(10):1395-409
pubmed: 25627034
Health Promot J Austr. 2021 Feb;32 Suppl 1:17-28
pubmed: 32865249
Int J STEM Educ. 2017;4(1):15
pubmed: 30631671
BMC Public Health. 2017 Mar 3;17(1):230
pubmed: 28253883
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 14;8(6):e020080
pubmed: 29903787
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Dec 12;16(1):130
pubmed: 31831006
BMC Public Health. 2015 Oct 23;15:1080
pubmed: 26498827
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 27;14(6):e0218863
pubmed: 31247045
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jul 07;14:694
pubmed: 25002024
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jun 5;18(1):690
pubmed: 29866099
J Adolesc. 2018 Jan;62:116-127
pubmed: 29179126
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Mar 25;14:42
pubmed: 24669751
Br J Nutr. 2015 Feb 14;113(3):517-25
pubmed: 25563904
Int J Public Health. 2009;54(5):303-5
pubmed: 19641847
Health Serv Res. 2013 Dec;48(6 Pt 2):2134-56
pubmed: 24279835
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jan 25;12:80
pubmed: 22276600