"If you don't find anything, you can't eat" - Mining livelihoods and income, gender roles, and food choices in northern Guinea.
Artisanal mining
Food choice
Guinea
Income instability
Women's workload
Journal
Resources policy
ISSN: 1873-7641
Titre abrégé: Resour Policy
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101777230
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Mar 2021
Historique:
entrez:
26
3
2021
pubmed:
27
3
2021
medline:
27
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) continues to grow as a viable economic activity in sub-Saharan Africa. The health and environmental impacts of the industry, notably linked to the use of potentially toxic chemicals, has been well documented. What has not been explored to the same extent is how pressures associated with ASM affect food choices of individuals and families living in mining camps. This paper presents research conducted in 18 mining sites in northern Guinea exploring food choices and the various factors affecting food decision-making practices. Two of the most influential factors to emerge from this study are income variability and gender roles. Results from this study suggest that through artisanal mining, women have the opportunity to earn a larger income that would otherwise be unavailable through agriculture. However, this benefit of potentially earning a larger income is often reduced or constrained by existing gender roles both at the mines and in the home, such as disparity in pay between men and women and increased pressures on women's time. This limits the potential benefit to household food decision-making that could have been gained from higher income. These results do not seek to establish one livelihood as superior; rather, they demonstrate that even when presented with opportunities to earn higher incomes, women still face many of the same barriers and challenges that they would in other economic activities. Additionally, while work and time demands on women change upon arrival in the mining camps, existing gender roles and expectations do not, further restricting women's decision-making capacity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33767524
doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101939
pii: S0301-4207(20)30969-7
pmc: PMC7976851
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
101939Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
J Sci Food Agric. 2013 Apr;93(6):1251-8
pubmed: 23371798
BMC Public Health. 2011 Apr 25;11:261
pubmed: 21518428
Afr Health Sci. 2005 Dec;5(4):328-34
pubmed: 16615845
Ann Behav Med. 2009 Dec;38 Suppl 1:S37-46
pubmed: 19787306
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Apr 10;660:1533-1541
pubmed: 30743945
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Sep 10;3(5):e000837
pubmed: 30233833
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Oct 12;12(10):12679-96
pubmed: 26473901
Appetite. 1996 Jun;26(3):247-65
pubmed: 8800481
Foods. 2020 Apr 10;9(4):
pubmed: 32290264