Paclitaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy after platinum-based chemotherapy and pembrolizumab for metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

carboplatin paclitaxel pembrolizumab platinum-based chemotherapy urothelial carcinoma

Journal

Molecular and clinical oncology
ISSN: 2049-9450
Titre abrégé: Mol Clin Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101613422

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2021
Historique:
received: 15 10 2020
accepted: 15 02 2021
entrez: 26 3 2021
pubmed: 27 3 2021
medline: 27 3 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Pembrolizumab has been available for the treatment of radical resectable urothelial carcinoma (UC) when it is exacerbated after chemotherapy since December 2017 in Japan. However, the efficacy of chemotherapy for cases progressing after pembrolizumab is unclear. The present study compared the outcomes and toxicities in patients with metastatic UC after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy and pembrolizumab, who were selected to receive paclitaxel and carboplatin (TC) chemotherapy, with those in patients who received the best supportive care (BSC). A total of 36 patients received pembrolizumab for metastatic UC at four institutions between January 2018 and August 2019. Of the 21 patients who progressed after pembrolizumab, 7 received TC chemotherapy (TC group) and 14 selected BSC (BSC group). The median observation period was 4.1 months. The 7 aforementioned patients who received TC chemotherapy (4 male and 3 female; median age, 62 years; range, 57-79 years) were analyzed in the present study. The ECOG performance status was 0 in three patients, 1 in one patient, 2 in two patients and 3 in one patient. Two patients had upper urinary tract UC, two had bladder UC and three had both types of UC. Six patients had visceral metastasis. The number of chemotherapy regimens before pembrolizumab was one in four patients, two in two patients and three in one patient. The objective response rate was 28.6% (partial response, 2 patients; stable disease, 4 patients; progressive disease, 1 patient), the median progression-free survival time was 3.4 months and the median overall survival time was 10.9 months (vs. 2.7 months in BSC group; P=0.0156). Although grade ≥3 adverse events developed in five patients, there were no treatment-associated deaths. The present results suggested that TC chemotherapy may be a preferred option for patients who require aggressive treatment after the failure of platinum-based chemotherapy and pembrolizumab.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33767860
doi: 10.3892/mco.2021.2253
pii: MCO-0-0-02253
pmc: PMC7976390
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

91

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © Furubayashi et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Références

Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
Thorac Cancer. 2019 Nov;10(11):2183-2187
pubmed: 31520515
J Immunol. 2009 Nov 15;183(10):6800-7
pubmed: 19846868
Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2010 Jun;10(6):983-91
pubmed: 20420527
Am J Clin Oncol. 1997 Oct;20(5):519-21
pubmed: 9345341
Int J Urol. 2007 Sep;14(9):828-32
pubmed: 17760750
Eur Urol. 2016 Jul;70(1):93-105
pubmed: 26935559
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Sep 20;27(27):4454-61
pubmed: 19687335
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Sep;11(9):861-70
pubmed: 20537950
Lung Cancer. 2017 Oct;112:90-95
pubmed: 29191606
Cancer. 2005 Oct 15;104(8):1627-32
pubmed: 16138364
Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Feb 1;12(3 Pt 1):878-87
pubmed: 16467102
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jul 25;381(4):338-348
pubmed: 31340094
Cancer Immunol Res. 2015 May;3(5):436-43
pubmed: 25941355
Int J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug;23(4):599-607
pubmed: 29556919
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2008 Oct;57(10):1523-9
pubmed: 18488219
J Clin Oncol. 1994 Nov;12(11):2264-70
pubmed: 7525883
J Clin Oncol. 1992 Jul;10(7):1066-73
pubmed: 1607913
Ann Oncol. 2019 Jun 1;30(6):970-976
pubmed: 31050707
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Nov;17(11):1497-1508
pubmed: 27745820
Eur Urol. 2018 Feb;73(2):149-152
pubmed: 28917596
J Clin Oncol. 2000 Sep;18(17):3068-77
pubmed: 11001674
N Engl J Med. 2017 Mar 16;376(11):1015-1026
pubmed: 28212060
Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Jun 15;11(12):4430-6
pubmed: 15958627
Mol Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec;7(6):1112-1118
pubmed: 29285384
Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Aug 15;10(16):5316-26
pubmed: 15328167
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Feb 15;20(4):937-40
pubmed: 11844814
J Anal Toxicol. 2008 Mar;32(2):140-6
pubmed: 18334097
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Oct 10;37(29):2592-2600
pubmed: 31356140
J Urol. 2000 Nov;164(5):1538-42
pubmed: 11025699

Auteurs

Nobuki Furubayashi (N)

Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka 811-1395, Japan.

Yoshifumi Hori (Y)

Department of Urology, Miyazaki Prefectural Miyazaki Hospital, Miyazaki 880-8510, Japan.

Futoshi Morokuma (F)

Department of Urology, Saga-ken Medical Centre Koseikan, Saga 840-8571, Japan.

Toshihisa Tomoda (T)

Department of Urology, Oita Prefectural Hospital, Oita 870-8511, Japan.

Takahito Negishi (T)

Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka 811-1395, Japan.

Tomohiro Inoue (T)

Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka 811-1395, Japan.

Masatoshi Kumagai (M)

Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka 811-1395, Japan.

Kentaro Kuroiwa (K)

Department of Urology, Miyazaki Prefectural Miyazaki Hospital, Miyazaki 880-8510, Japan.

Noriaki Tokuda (N)

Department of Urology, Saga-ken Medical Centre Koseikan, Saga 840-8571, Japan.

Motonobu Nakamura (M)

Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka 811-1395, Japan.

Classifications MeSH