Prognostic effect of preoperative systemic immune-inflammation index in patients treated with cytoreductive nephrectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.


Journal

Minerva urology and nephrology
ISSN: 2724-6442
Titre abrégé: Minerva Urol Nephrol
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101777299

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 27 3 2021
medline: 26 5 2022
entrez: 26 3 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Identifying those of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who are most likely to benefit from cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) is challenging. We tested the association between preoperative value of Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) and overall survival (OS) as well as cancer-specific survival (CSS) in mRCC patients treated with CN. mRCC patients treated with CN at different institutions were included. After assessing for the optimal pretreatment SII cut‑off value, we found 710 to have the maximum Youden Index value. The overall population was therefore divided into two SII groups using this cut‑off (low, <710 vs. high, ≥710). Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses tested the association SII and OS as well as CSS. The discrimination of the model was evaluated with the Harrel's Concordance Index (C-Index). The clinical value of the SII was evaluated with decision curve analysis (DCA). Among 613 mRCC patients, 298 (49%) patients had a SII≥710. Median follow-up was 31 (IQR 16-58) months. On univariable analysis, high preoperative serum SII was significantly associated with worse OS (HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.07-1.54, P=0.01) and CSS (HR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.08-1.55, P=0.01). On multivariable analysis, which adjusted for the effect of established clinicopathologic features, SII≥710 was associated with OS (HR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.04-1.50, P=0.02) and CSS (HR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.05-1.52, P=0.01). The addition of SII only slightly improved the discrimination of a base model that included established clinicopathologic features (C-index: 0.637 vs. 0.629). On DCA, the inclusion of SII did not improve the net-benefit of the prognostic model. On multivariable analyses, SII≥710 remained independently associated with the worse OS and CSS in IMDC intermediate risk group (both: HR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.02-1.67, P=0.03). In the subgroup analyses based on the BMI, among patients with BMI ≥ 25, SII was significantly associated with OS (HR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.04-1.61, P=0.02) and CSS (HR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.05-1.63, P=0.02). We found an independent association of high SII prior to CN with unfavorable clinical outcomes, particularly in patients with intermediate risk mRCC and patients with increased BMI. Despite these results, it does not seem to add any prognostic or clinical benefit beyond that obtained by currently available clinicopathologic characteristics as sole worker.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Identifying those of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who are most likely to benefit from cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) is challenging. We tested the association between preoperative value of Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) and overall survival (OS) as well as cancer-specific survival (CSS) in mRCC patients treated with CN.
METHODS METHODS
mRCC patients treated with CN at different institutions were included. After assessing for the optimal pretreatment SII cut‑off value, we found 710 to have the maximum Youden Index value. The overall population was therefore divided into two SII groups using this cut‑off (low, <710 vs. high, ≥710). Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses tested the association SII and OS as well as CSS. The discrimination of the model was evaluated with the Harrel's Concordance Index (C-Index). The clinical value of the SII was evaluated with decision curve analysis (DCA).
RESULTS RESULTS
Among 613 mRCC patients, 298 (49%) patients had a SII≥710. Median follow-up was 31 (IQR 16-58) months. On univariable analysis, high preoperative serum SII was significantly associated with worse OS (HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.07-1.54, P=0.01) and CSS (HR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.08-1.55, P=0.01). On multivariable analysis, which adjusted for the effect of established clinicopathologic features, SII≥710 was associated with OS (HR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.04-1.50, P=0.02) and CSS (HR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.05-1.52, P=0.01). The addition of SII only slightly improved the discrimination of a base model that included established clinicopathologic features (C-index: 0.637 vs. 0.629). On DCA, the inclusion of SII did not improve the net-benefit of the prognostic model. On multivariable analyses, SII≥710 remained independently associated with the worse OS and CSS in IMDC intermediate risk group (both: HR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.02-1.67, P=0.03). In the subgroup analyses based on the BMI, among patients with BMI ≥ 25, SII was significantly associated with OS (HR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.04-1.61, P=0.02) and CSS (HR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.05-1.63, P=0.02).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
We found an independent association of high SII prior to CN with unfavorable clinical outcomes, particularly in patients with intermediate risk mRCC and patients with increased BMI. Despite these results, it does not seem to add any prognostic or clinical benefit beyond that obtained by currently available clinicopathologic characteristics as sole worker.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33769012
pii: S2724-6051.21.04023-6
doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04023-6
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

329-336

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Auteurs

Ekaterina Laukhtina (E)

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.

Benjamin Pradere (B)

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Urology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France.

David D'Andrea (D)

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Giuseppe Rosiello (G)

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.

Stefano Luzzago (S)

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Angela Pecoraro (A)

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Carlotta Palumbo (C)

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Urology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Radiological Science and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.

Sophie Knipper (S)

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Pierre I Karakiewicz (PI)

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Vitaly Margulis (V)

Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Fahad Quhal (F)

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.

Reza Sari Motlagh (R)

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Hadi Mostafaei (H)

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

Keiichiro Mori (K)

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Victor M Schuettfort (VM)

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Dmitry Enikeev (D)

Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.

Shahrokh F Shariat (SF)

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria - shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at.
Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.
Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, the Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH