Investigation of a pertussis outbreak and comparison of two acellular booster pertussis vaccines in a junior school in South East England, 2019.
3-component
5-component
acellular vaccine
outbreak
pertussis
Journal
Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin
ISSN: 1560-7917
Titre abrégé: Euro Surveill
Pays: Sweden
ID NLM: 100887452
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2021
03 2021
Historique:
entrez:
26
3
2021
pubmed:
27
3
2021
medline:
1
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In March 2019, a pertussis outbreak occurred in children in a junior school (7-11 years) in England who had been offered pertussis-containing booster vaccine at 40 months of age. In a case-control investigation, we assessed the extent of transmission and any difference in protection afforded to those who had previously received a booster 3- or 5-component acellular pertussis vaccine (aP). We took oral fluid specimens from the students to determine IgG antibodies against pertussis toxin (anti-PT). Parents of students attending the school were sent a questionnaire on pertussis symptoms and vaccination status was retrieved from general practitioner records for all students. Of 381 students, 134 (35.2%) were classified as pertussis cases, 133 by demonstration of significant anti-PT IgG titres and one clinically. There was no significant difference in the risk of pertussis between students receiving 3-component (33.7%) or 5-component (32.3%) aP boosters. However, pertussis infection differed significantly in school year 4, with 22.9%, 50.0%, 23.7% and 38.1% pertussis cases in years 3, 4, 5 and 6, respectively. The proportion of students with incomplete vaccinations recorded was higher than the proportion of those not covered according to the national reported coverage, possibly contributing to sustained transmission within the school.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33769247
doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.12.2000244
pmc: PMC7995557
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Bacterial
0
Pertussis Vaccine
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Vaccine. 2018 Dec 18;36(52):7950-7955
pubmed: 30420118
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009 Mar;28(3):242-4
pubmed: 19209094
Curr Opin Immunol. 2019 Aug;59:72-78
pubmed: 31078081
Euro Surveill. 2013 Sep 19;18(38):
pubmed: 24084340
Lancet. 1997 Nov 29;350(9091):1569-77
pubmed: 9393335
Vaccine. 2002 Mar 15;20(13-14):1778-86
pubmed: 11906765
BMJ. 2019 Feb 22;364:l401
pubmed: 30796107
Vaccine. 2002 Jan 31;20(9-10):1316-30
pubmed: 11818150
J Med Microbiol. 2009 Aug;58(Pt 8):1023-1029
pubmed: 19528165
PLoS Pathog. 2009 Oct;5(10):e1000647
pubmed: 19876392
JAMA. 2012 Aug 1;308(5):454-6
pubmed: 22851107
J Med Microbiol. 2013 Sep;62(Pt 9):1281-1289
pubmed: 23722435
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jan 2;70(2):200-207
pubmed: 31059566
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2001 Dec;20(12):1108-12
pubmed: 11740314
Emerg Infect Dis. 2014 Jun;20(6):968-75
pubmed: 24856627
J Med Microbiol. 2006 Sep;55(Pt 9):1223-1228
pubmed: 16914652
Lancet Infect Dis. 2011 Jul;11(7):557-70
pubmed: 21600850