Optimal policy for attention-modulated decisions explains human fixation behavior.

decision-making diffusion models human neuroscience optimality visual attention

Journal

eLife
ISSN: 2050-084X
Titre abrégé: Elife
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101579614

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 03 2021
Historique:
received: 24 09 2020
accepted: 17 03 2021
pubmed: 27 3 2021
medline: 14 9 2021
entrez: 26 3 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Traditional accumulation-to-bound decision-making models assume that all choice options are processed with equal attention. In real life decisions, however, humans alternate their visual fixation between individual items to efficiently gather relevant information (Yang et al., 2016). These fixations also causally affect one's choices, biasing them toward the longer-fixated item (Krajbich et al., 2010). We derive a normative decision-making model in which attention enhances the reliability of information, consistent with neurophysiological findings (Cohen and Maunsell, 2009). Furthermore, our model actively controls fixation changes to optimize information gathering. We show that the optimal model reproduces fixation-related choice biases seen in humans and provides a Bayesian computational rationale for this phenomenon. This insight led to additional predictions that we could confirm in human data. Finally, by varying the relative cognitive advantage conferred by attention, we show that decision performance is benefited by a balanced spread of resources between the attended and unattended items.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33769284
doi: 10.7554/eLife.63436
pii: 63436
pmc: PMC8064754
doi:
pii:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH115554
Pays : United States
Organisme : James S. McDonnell Foundation
ID : 220020462

Informations de copyright

© 2021, Jang et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

AJ, RS, JD No competing interests declared

Références

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jun 18;110 Suppl 2:10438-45
pubmed: 23754404
Nat Neurosci. 2018 Jun;21(6):808-810
pubmed: 29786083
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:611-47
pubmed: 15217345
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Dec;147(12):1892-1904
pubmed: 29771566
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Dec;147(12):1810-1826
pubmed: 30247061
Nat Neurosci. 2010 Oct;13(10):1292-8
pubmed: 20835253
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jul 19;113(29):8332-7
pubmed: 27382164
J Neurosci. 2010 Nov 10;30(45):15241-53
pubmed: 21068329
Psychol Sci. 2019 Jan;30(1):116-128
pubmed: 30526339
Q J Exp Psychol. 1980 Feb;32(1):3-25
pubmed: 7367577
Science. 2018 Jan 26;359(6374):463-465
pubmed: 29371470
Neuron. 2016 Dec 21;92(6):1398-1411
pubmed: 27916454
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Oct;6(10):755-65
pubmed: 16163383
Nat Neurosci. 2019 Sep;22(9):1503-1511
pubmed: 31384015
Neuron. 2016 Jun 1;90(5):927-39
pubmed: 27253447
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Mar;2(3):194-203
pubmed: 11256080
Neuron. 2009 Sep 24;63(6):879-88
pubmed: 19778515
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Aug;143(4):1476-88
pubmed: 24548281
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Mar;3(3):201-15
pubmed: 11994752
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Nov 28;114(48):12696-12701
pubmed: 29133418
Neuron. 2007 Jul 5;55(1):131-41
pubmed: 17610822
Vision Res. 2008 Sep;48(20):2070-89
pubmed: 18513781
Nat Neurosci. 2009 Dec;12(12):1594-600
pubmed: 19915566
Nature. 1996 Nov 7;384(6604):74-7
pubmed: 8900281
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 May;7(5):358-66
pubmed: 16760916
J Neurosci. 2012 Mar 14;32(11):3612-28
pubmed: 22423085
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1952 Aug;38(8):716-9
pubmed: 16589166
Elife. 2020 Nov 17;9:
pubmed: 33200982
Nat Neurosci. 2003 Dec;6(12):1317-22
pubmed: 14608360
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Feb 11;13:35
pubmed: 30804770
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2018 Jul 8;41:77-97
pubmed: 29799773
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Jun;4(6):634-645
pubmed: 32015490
Nat Commun. 2016 Aug 18;7:12400
pubmed: 27535638
Elife. 2016 Feb 10;5:
pubmed: 26880546
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 16;108(33):13852-7
pubmed: 21808009
Psychol Rev. 2006 Oct;113(4):700-65
pubmed: 17014301
J Neurophysiol. 1976 Jul;39(4):722-44
pubmed: 823302
PLoS Comput Biol. 2014 Jun 19;10(6):e1003661
pubmed: 24945142
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Oct 1;110(40):E3858-67
pubmed: 24019496
Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Apr;9(4):188-94
pubmed: 15808501
Front Neurosci. 2017 Aug 24;11:468
pubmed: 28894413
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2010 Apr;20(2):262-70
pubmed: 20338744
Neural Comput. 2008 Apr;20(4):873-922
pubmed: 18085991
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Jun;35(3):700-17
pubmed: 19485686
Curr Biol. 2018 Mar 5;28(5):676-685.e4
pubmed: 29456140
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 27;8(11):e78993
pubmed: 24312172

Auteurs

Anthony I Jang (AI)

Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.

Ravi Sharma (R)

Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, United States.

Jan Drugowitsch (J)

Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH