Latitude dictates plant diversity effects on instream decomposition.
Journal
Science advances
ISSN: 2375-2548
Titre abrégé: Sci Adv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101653440
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2021
03 2021
Historique:
received:
14
09
2020
accepted:
05
02
2021
entrez:
27
3
2021
pubmed:
28
3
2021
medline:
28
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Running waters contribute substantially to global carbon fluxes through decomposition of terrestrial plant litter by aquatic microorganisms and detritivores. Diversity of this litter may influence instream decomposition globally in ways that are not yet understood. We investigated latitudinal differences in decomposition of litter mixtures of low and high functional diversity in 40 streams on 6 continents and spanning 113° of latitude. Despite important variability in our dataset, we found latitudinal differences in the effect of litter functional diversity on decomposition, which we explained as evolutionary adaptations of litter-consuming detritivores to resource availability. Specifically, a balanced diet effect appears to operate at lower latitudes versus a resource concentration effect at higher latitudes. The latitudinal pattern indicates that loss of plant functional diversity will have different consequences on carbon fluxes across the globe, with greater repercussions likely at low latitudes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33771867
pii: 7/13/eabe7860
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe7860
pmc: PMC7997509
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC).
Références
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 7;7(1):10799
pubmed: 28883445
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2016 Nov;92(11):
pubmed: 27515735
PLoS One. 2009 May 27;4(5):e5695
pubmed: 19479086
Am J Bot. 2011 Mar;98(3):572-92
pubmed: 21613148
Ecol Lett. 2012 Jul;15(7):637-48
pubmed: 22583836
Nature. 2014 May 8;509(7499):218-21
pubmed: 24805346
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Aug;23(8):3064-3075
pubmed: 28039909
Ecology. 2011 Aug;92(8):1573-81
pubmed: 21905424
Sci Adv. 2019 Jan 09;5(1):eaav0486
pubmed: 30662951
Ecology. 2009 Apr;90(4):1073-83
pubmed: 19449701
Theor Popul Biol. 1976 Apr;9(2):129-36
pubmed: 1273796
Science. 2018 Aug 10;361(6402):585-588
pubmed: 29954985
Am Nat. 2004 Jul;164(1):E1-19
pubmed: 15266376
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Apr 27;283(1829):
pubmed: 27122551
Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Jun;25(6):372-80
pubmed: 20189677
Ecology. 2011 Sep;92(9):1839-48
pubmed: 21939080
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 5;7(1):10562
pubmed: 28874830
Ecology. 2013 Mar;94(3):565-72
pubmed: 23687882
Oecologia. 2000 May;123(2):252-264
pubmed: 28308730