Convolutional neural networks for PET functional volume fully automatic segmentation: development and validation in a multi-center setting.
Cervical cancer
Convolutional neural network
PET
Segmentation
U-Net
Journal
European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
ISSN: 1619-7089
Titre abrégé: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101140988
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2021
10 2021
Historique:
received:
08
09
2020
accepted:
07
02
2021
pubmed:
28
3
2021
medline:
21
10
2021
entrez:
27
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In this work, we addressed fully automatic determination of tumor functional uptake from positron emission tomography (PET) images without relying on other image modalities or additional prior constraints, in the context of multicenter images with heterogeneous characteristics. In cervical cancer, an additional challenge is the location of the tumor uptake near or even stuck to the bladder. PET datasets of 232 patients from five institutions were exploited. To avoid unreliable manual delineations, the ground truth was generated with a semi-automated approach: a volume containing the tumor and excluding the bladder was first manually determined, then a well-validated, semi-automated approach relying on the Fuzzy locally Adaptive Bayesian (FLAB) algorithm was applied to generate the ground truth. Our model built on the U-Net architecture incorporates residual blocks with concurrent spatial squeeze and excitation modules, as well as learnable non-linear downsampling and upsampling blocks. Experiments relied on cross-validation (four institutions for training and validation, and the fifth for testing). The model achieved good Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) with little variability across institutions (0.80 ± 0.03), with higher recall (0.90 ± 0.05) than precision (0.75 ± 0.05) and improved results over the standard U-Net (DSC 0.77 ± 0.05, recall 0.87 ± 0.02, precision 0.74 ± 0.08). Both vastly outperformed a fixed threshold at 40% of SUVmax (DSC 0.33 ± 0.15, recall 0.52 ± 0.17, precision 0.30 ± 0.16). In all cases, the model could determine the tumor uptake without including the bladder. Neither shape priors nor anatomical information was required to achieve efficient training. The proposed method could facilitate the deployment of a fully automated radiomics pipeline in such a challenging multicenter context.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33772335
doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05244-z
pii: 10.1007/s00259-021-05244-z
pmc: PMC8440243
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3444-3456Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Nat Med. 2018 Oct;24(10):1559-1567
pubmed: 30224757
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2020 Sep;39(9):2893-2903
pubmed: 32167887
J Digit Imaging. 2019 Jun;32(3):462-470
pubmed: 30719587
Oncotarget. 2018 Jan 13;9(11):10005-10015
pubmed: 29515786
Nat Methods. 2021 Feb;18(2):203-211
pubmed: 33288961
Med Image Anal. 2017 Dec;42:60-88
pubmed: 28778026
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Feb;8(2):e191-e203
pubmed: 31812369
Med Phys. 2007 Nov;34(11):4223-35
pubmed: 18072487
Cancer Imaging. 2019 Dec 21;19(1):89
pubmed: 31864421
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016 Jul;43(8):1477-85
pubmed: 26896298
Med Phys. 2019 Feb;46(2):665-678
pubmed: 30506687
IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci. 2019 Mar;3(2):162-169
pubmed: 34722958
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2019 May;38(5):1116-1126
pubmed: 30387726
Med Phys. 2017 Nov;44(11):5835-5848
pubmed: 28837224
Med Image Anal. 2018 Feb;44:177-195
pubmed: 29268169
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Apr;45(4):630-641
pubmed: 29177871
J Nucl Med. 2019 Sep;60(Suppl 2):38S-44S
pubmed: 31481588
Phys Med Biol. 2019 Oct 16;64(20):205015
pubmed: 31514173
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Apr;46(4):864-877
pubmed: 30535746
J Nucl Med. 2011 Nov;52(11):1690-7
pubmed: 21990577
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009 Jun;28(6):881-93
pubmed: 19150782
IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci. 2019 Mar;3(2):153-161
pubmed: 32754674
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 May 1;77(1):301-8
pubmed: 20116934
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 13;13(4):e0195798
pubmed: 29652908
Med Phys. 2007 Dec;34(12):4738-49
pubmed: 18196801
Eur Radiol. 2019 Sep;29(9):4765-4775
pubmed: 30747300
Med Phys. 2019 Nov;46(11):4940-4950
pubmed: 31423590
Phys Med Biol. 2019 Apr 12;64(8):085019
pubmed: 30818303
Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging. 2018 Apr;2018:228-231
pubmed: 31772717
Med Phys. 2017 Jun;44(6):e1-e42
pubmed: 28120467
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2019 Jan;38(1):280-290
pubmed: 30080145
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Jun;119(3):473-9
pubmed: 27178141
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Dec 21;64(1):015011
pubmed: 30523964
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2018 Oct 24;2018:8923028
pubmed: 30473644
Phys Med Biol. 2020 Dec 18;65(24):245032
pubmed: 32235059
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2020 Aug;42(8):2011-2023
pubmed: 31034408
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011 Apr;38(4):663-72
pubmed: 21225425
IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci. 2020 Jan;4(1):37-49
pubmed: 32939423
Oncotarget. 2017 Jun 27;8(26):43169-43179
pubmed: 28574816