The impact of COVID-19 on prenatal care in the United States: Qualitative analysis from a survey of 2519 pregnant women.


Journal

Midwifery
ISSN: 1532-3099
Titre abrégé: Midwifery
Pays: Scotland
ID NLM: 8510930

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2021
Historique:
received: 11 09 2020
revised: 08 02 2021
accepted: 09 03 2021
pubmed: 29 3 2021
medline: 27 5 2021
entrez: 28 3 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To explore if and how women perceived their prenatal care to have changed as a result of COVID-19 and the impact of those changes on pregnant women. Qualitative analysis of open-ended prompts included as part of an anonymous, online, cross-sectional survey of pregnant women in the United States. Online survey with participants from 47 states within the U.S. Self-identified pregnant women recruited through Facebook, Twitter, and other online sources. An anonymous, online survey of pregnant women (distributed April 3 - 24, 2020) included an open-ended prompt asking women to tell us how COVID-19 had affected their prenatal care. Open-ended narrative responses were downloaded into Excel and coded using the Attride-Sterling Framework. 2519 pregnant women from 47 states responded to the survey, 88.4% of whom had at least one previous birth. Mean age was 32.7 years, mean weeks pregnant was 24.3 weeks, and mean number of prenatal visits at the point of the survey was 6.5. Predominant themes of the open narratives included COVID-19's role in creating structural changes within the healthcare system (reported spontaneously by 2075 respondents), behavioral changes among both pregnant women and their providers (reported by 429 respondents), and emotional consequences for women who were pregnant (reported by 503 respondents) during the pandemic. Changes resulting from COVID-19 varied widely by provider, and women's perceptions of the impact on quality of care ranged from perceiving care as extremely compromised to perceiving it to be improved as a result of the pandemic. Women who are pregnant during the COVID-19 pandemic have faced enormous upheaval as hospitals and healthcare providers have struggled to meet the simultaneous and often competing demands of infection prevention, pandemic preparedness, high patient volumes of extremely sick patients, and the needs of 'non-urgent' pregnant patients. In some settings, women described very few changes, whereas others reported radical changes implemented seemingly overnight. While infection rates may drive variable responses, these inconsistencies raise important questions regarding the need for local, state, national, or even global recommendations for the care of pregnant women during a global pandemic such as COVID-19.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33774388
pii: S0266-6138(21)00070-X
doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.102991
pmc: PMC9756085
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

102991

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of Interest The authors report no conflict of interest.

Références

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jun;224(6):615.e1-615.e12
pubmed: 33347842
JAMA. 2020 Sep 22;324(12):1210-1212
pubmed: 32797148
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Nov;293:113475
pubmed: 33007683
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2018 May;67(3):1-14
pubmed: 29874159
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;136(2):300-302
pubmed: 32496337
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 May;135(5):1038-1046
pubmed: 32282598
JAMA. 2020 Jul 10;:
pubmed: 32648892
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 31;11:2195
pubmed: 32982888
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jul;136(1):37-41
pubmed: 32355131
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
Women Birth. 2019 Feb;32(1):e131-e137
pubmed: 29747955
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Dec;266:113348
pubmed: 32927382
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 13;15(10):e0240650
pubmed: 33048979
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Jul;8(7):e877-e878
pubmed: 32333854
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2020 Dec;23(6):757-765
pubmed: 32989598
Front Glob Womens Health. 2020 Jun 19;1:1
pubmed: 34816146
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;223(3):389.e1-389.e10
pubmed: 32425200
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020 Aug;2(3):100155
pubmed: 32838261
Gen Psychiatr. 2020 Mar 6;33(2):e100213
pubmed: 32215365
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):293-295
pubmed: 32387321
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):240.e1-240.e9
pubmed: 32437665
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 15;17(16):
pubmed: 32824191
Lancet. 2020 Mar 14;395(10227):912-920
pubmed: 32112714
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2020 Dec;23(6):767-773
pubmed: 33047207

Auteurs

Sarah Javaid (S)

School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 48109.

Sarah Barringer (S)

University of Michigan, 500 S. State Street, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 48109.

Sarah D Compton (SD)

Global REACH, 1111 E. Catherine Street, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 48109; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 48109.

Elizabeth Kaselitz (E)

Global REACH, 1111 E. Catherine Street, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 48109.

Maria Muzik (M)

Department of Psychiatry, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 48109.

Cheryl A Moyer (CA)

Global REACH, 1111 E. Catherine Street, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 48109; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 48109; Department of Learning Health Sciences, 1111 E. Catherine Street, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 48109. Electronic address: camoyer@umich.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH