MTX optimization or adding bDMARD equally improve disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: results from the prospective study STRATEGE.
management
methotrexate
optimization
rheumatoid arthritis
treat-to-target
Journal
Rheumatology (Oxford, England)
ISSN: 1462-0332
Titre abrégé: Rheumatology (Oxford)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100883501
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 12 2021
24 12 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
29
3
2021
medline:
22
2
2022
entrez:
28
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The STRATEGE (Therapeutic Strategy in Patients Treated With Methotrexate for Rheumatoid Arthritis) study aimed to describe treatment strategies in current practice in RA biologic DMARD (bDMARD)-naïve patients with an inadequate response to MTX therapy, and to compare clinical efficacy of the different therapeutic strategies on disease activity after 6 months. The main inclusion criteria of this prospective, observational, multicentre study were confirmed RA diagnosis, treatment by MTX monotherapy and need for therapeutic management modification. The 722 patients included had a mean (s.d.) RA duration of 5.3 (6.7) years, a mean DAS28 of 4.0 (1.1); they were all receiving MTX monotherapy, 68% oral, at a mean dose of 15.0 (4.1) mg/week. Two major strategies were identified: (i) MTX monotherapy dose and/or route optimization (72%) and (ii) bDMARD initiation ± MTX (16%). MTX dosing was modified for 70% of patients, maintained (dose and route) for 28% of patients and interrupted for 2%. bDMARDs were started when the MTX mean dose was 17.4 mg/week, 56% parenterally; MTX was maintained concomitantly for 96% of patients. Six-month follow-up results adjusted by propensity score showed that both options were equally successful in improving disease activity and physical function, with 63 and 68% of good-to-moderate EULAR responses, respectively. The STRATEGE study shows the importance of initial MTX treatment optimization before initiation of a biological treatment and emphasizes the importance of treat-to-target strategy. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02288520.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33774669
pii: 6198097
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab274
pmc: PMC8742827
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antirheumatic Agents
0
Methotrexate
YL5FZ2Y5U1
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02288520']
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
270-280Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.
Références
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jan;75(1):3-15
pubmed: 25969430
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019 Apr 1;58(4):559-560
pubmed: 29672739
Joint Bone Spine. 2019 Mar;86(2):135-150
pubmed: 30315988
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Dec;76(12):2054-2060
pubmed: 28866645
Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Dec;68(12):1870-7
pubmed: 19124524
Joint Bone Spine. 2015 Jan;82(1):13-7
pubmed: 25238951
Eur J Rheumatol. 2018 Jul;5(2):85-91
pubmed: 30185354
Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Nov;66(11):1443-9
pubmed: 17519278
Arthritis Rheum. 1988 Mar;31(3):315-24
pubmed: 3358796
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Jan;68(1):1-26
pubmed: 26545940
Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Nov;50(11):3432-43
pubmed: 15529377
Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Sep;74(9):1691-6
pubmed: 24794149
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2017 Feb;10(1):42-49
pubmed: 28465768
Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Jul;68(7):1086-93
pubmed: 19033291
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2018 May;30(3):282-287
pubmed: 29356697
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jun;75(6):1003-8
pubmed: 25979945
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Jan;58(1):73-81
pubmed: 18163521
Scand J Rheumatol. 2014;43(6):470-6
pubmed: 24898259
Lancet. 2004 Jul 17-23;364(9430):263-9
pubmed: 15262104
Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Nov;52(11):3381-90
pubmed: 16258899
Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Jun;79(6):685-699
pubmed: 31969328
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Aug;72(8):1104-1111
pubmed: 31112011
Arthritis Rheum. 2010 Sep;62(9):2569-81
pubmed: 20872595
Clin Rheumatol. 2013 Nov;32(11):1605-12
pubmed: 23835658
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Aug;73(8):1549-51
pubmed: 24728329