Impact of Pretransplantation Renal Dysfunction on Outcomes after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.
Allogeneic transplantation
Dialysis
HCT-CI
Renal dysfunction
Journal
Transplantation and cellular therapy
ISSN: 2666-6367
Titre abrégé: Transplant Cell Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101774629
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2021
05 2021
Historique:
received:
14
10
2020
revised:
16
12
2020
accepted:
09
02
2021
pubmed:
30
3
2021
medline:
3
7
2021
entrez:
29
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Renal dysfunction is a recognized risk factor for mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), yet our understanding of the effect of different levels of renal dysfunction at time of transplantation on outcomes remains limited. This study explores the impact of different degrees of renal dysfunction on HCT outcomes and examines whether the utilization of incremental degrees of renal dysfunction based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) improve the predictability of the hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index (HCT-CI). The study population included 2 cohorts: cohort 1, comprising patients age ≥40 years who underwent alloHCT for treatment of hematologic malignancies between 2008 and 2016 (n = 13,505; cohort selected given a very low incidence of renal dysfunction in individuals age <40 years), and cohort 2, comprising patients on dialysis at the time of HCT (n = 46). eGFR was measured using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) method. The patients in cohort 1 were assigned into 4 categories-eGFR ≥90 mL/min (n = 7062), eGFR 60 to 89 mL/min (n = 5264), eGFR 45 to 59 mL/min (n = 897), and eGFR <45 mL/min (n=282)-to assess the impact of degree of renal dysfunction on transplantation outcomes. Transplantation outcomes in patients on dialysis at the time of alloHCT were analyzed separately. eGFR <60 mL/min was associated with an increased risk for nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and requirement for dialysis post-HCT. Compared with the eGFR ≥90 group, the hazard ratio (HR) for NRM was 1.46 (P = .0001) for the eGFR 45 to 59 mL/min group and 1.74 (P = .004) for the eGFR <45 mL/min group. Compared with the eGFR ≥90 mL/min group, the eGFR 45 to 59 mL/min group (HR, 2.45; P < .0001) and the eGFR <45 mL/min group (HR, 3.09; P < .0001) had a higher risk of renal failure necessitating dialysis after alloHCT. In addition, eGFR <45 mL/min was associated with an increased overall mortality (HR, 1.63; P < .0001). An eGFR-based revised HCT-CI was also developed and shown to be predictive of overall survival (OS) and NRM, with predictive performance similar to the original HCT-CI. Among 46 patients on dialysis at alloHCT, the 1-year probability of OS was 20%, and that of NRM was 67%. The degree of pretransplantation renal dysfunction is an independent predictor of OS, NRM, and probability of needing dialysis after alloHCT. An eGFR-based HCT-CI is a validated index for predicting outcomes in adults with hematologic malignancies undergoing alloHCT. The outcomes of alloHCT recipients on dialysis are dismal; therefore, one should strongly weigh the significant risks of being on hemodialysis as a factor in determining alloHCT candidacy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33775617
pii: S2666-6367(21)00717-X
doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.02.030
pmc: PMC8168834
mid: NIHMS1701233
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
410-422Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U24 CA076518
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. All rights reserved.
Références
Semin Nephrol. 2010 Nov;30(6):602-14
pubmed: 21146125
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2002 Aug;30(3):195-8
pubmed: 12189539
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2020 Mar;55(3):553-561
pubmed: 31558788
Blood. 2005 Oct 15;106(8):2912-9
pubmed: 15994282
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Mar 21;144(6):407-14
pubmed: 16549853
Haematologica. 2016 Nov;101(11):1426-1433
pubmed: 27662010
Ann Intern Med. 2009 May 5;150(9):604-12
pubmed: 19414839
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2007 Mar;39(6):359-65
pubmed: 17342159
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014 Jul;20(7):908-19
pubmed: 24565993
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Jun 4;158(11):825-30
pubmed: 23732715
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014 Nov;20(11):1828-34
pubmed: 25064745
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010 Jan;25(1):278-82
pubmed: 19762604
Blood. 2016 Mar 24;127(12):1539-43
pubmed: 26796362
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018 Jun 7;13(6):866-873
pubmed: 29669818
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009 Sep;15(9):1094-9
pubmed: 19660722
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015 Aug;21(8):1418-24
pubmed: 25862589
Am J Med. 1980 Aug;69(2):204-17
pubmed: 6996481
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2019 Aug;54(Suppl 2):793-797
pubmed: 31431706
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017 Oct;23(10):1651-1657
pubmed: 28549771
Bone Marrow Transplant. 1995 Jun;15(6):825-8
pubmed: 7581076
Transplantation. 2011 Sep 27;92(6):e28-9
pubmed: 21909016
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 9;374(23):2256-67
pubmed: 27276563
Ann Hematol. 2013 Jan;92(2):255-60
pubmed: 23053182
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017 Sep;23(9):1417-1421
pubmed: 28606646
Leuk Lymphoma. 2017 Mar;58(3):740-742
pubmed: 27454657
Leuk Lymphoma. 2012 Jan;53(1):158-9
pubmed: 21749304
Blood Adv. 2017;1(4):288-292
pubmed: 29242852
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008 Nov;14(11):1312-6
pubmed: 18940687
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018 Aug;24(8):1685-1691
pubmed: 29753163