Employment relations and dismissal regulations: Does employment legislation protect the health of workers?
dismissal legislation
health
insecurity
institutions
job loss
precariousness
Journal
Social policy & administration
ISSN: 0144-5596
Titre abrégé: Soc Policy Adm
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7908249
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Dec 2019
Historique:
received:
02
02
2018
revised:
11
12
2018
accepted:
12
12
2018
entrez:
29
3
2021
pubmed:
1
12
2019
medline:
1
12
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Sociologists have long acknowledged that being in a precarious labour market position, whether employed or unemployed, can harm peoples' health. However, scholars have yet to fully investigate the possible contextual, institutional determinants of this relationship. Two institutions that were overlooked in previous empirical studies are the regulations that set minimum compensation for dismissal, severance payments, and entitlements to a period of notice before dismissal, notice periods. These institutions may be important for workers' health as they influence the degree of insecurity that workers are exposed to. Here, we test this hypothesis by examining whether longer notice periods and greater severance payments protect the health of labour market participants, both employed and unemployed. We constructed two cohorts of panel data before and during the European recession using data from 22 countries in the European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (person years = 338,000). We find more generous severance payments significantly reduce the probability that labour market participants, especially the unemployed, will experience declines in self-reported health, with a slightly weaker relationship for longer notice periods.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33776168
doi: 10.1111/spol.12487
pii: SPOL12487
pmc: PMC7983177
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
939-957Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors. Social Policy & Administration published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Health Policy. 2012 Feb;104(2):99-127
pubmed: 22137444
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Apr;61(4):276-7
pubmed: 17372284
J Health Soc Behav. 2007 Sep;48(3):239-53
pubmed: 17982866
BMC Psychiatry. 2013 May 24;13:144
pubmed: 23705753
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1994 Aug;48(4):333-7
pubmed: 7964329
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Dec;61(12):1098-102
pubmed: 18000134
J Fam Psychol. 2004 Dec;18(4):639-50
pubmed: 15598169
Eur J Public Health. 2015 Oct;25(5):801-6
pubmed: 26045524
J Health Soc Behav. 1995 Sep;36(3):213-29
pubmed: 7594355
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002 Jun;56(6):450-4
pubmed: 12011203
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014 Jul;68(7):657-62
pubmed: 24616353
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009 Feb;63(2):92-8
pubmed: 18930981
Am J Public Health. 2004 Jan;94(1):82-8
pubmed: 14713703
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Nov;121:98-108
pubmed: 25442371
Lancet. 2009 Jul 25;374(9686):315-23
pubmed: 19589588
Eur J Public Health. 2012 Jun;22(3):429-33
pubmed: 21602222
Lancet. 2015 Aug 8;386(9993):533-40
pubmed: 26049253
Am J Public Health. 2015 Feb;105(2):317-23
pubmed: 25521897
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Mar;128:43-51
pubmed: 25589031
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Dec;67(12):1982-94
pubmed: 18951671
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000 Jul;54(7):494-501
pubmed: 10846191
Int J Health Serv. 2000;30(3):477-90
pubmed: 11109177
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Apr;44(2):451-61
pubmed: 25948659
Sociol Health Illn. 2011 Sep;33(6):946-64
pubmed: 21899562
Annu Rev Public Health. 2011;32:431-50
pubmed: 21054175
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Aug;69(3):307-16
pubmed: 19520474
J Public Health Policy. 2015 Nov;36(4):452-68
pubmed: 26290470
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Mar;80:19-23
pubmed: 23415587
Occup Environ Med. 2011 Aug;68(8):570-4
pubmed: 21081513
Lancet. 2005 Mar 19-25;365(9464):1099-104
pubmed: 15781105
Health Policy. 2014 Mar;115(1):1-8
pubmed: 24315493
Psychol Med. 2010 Aug;40(8):1401-7
pubmed: 19903366
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Jun;74(12):1911-20
pubmed: 22465382
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Dec;51(6):1173-82
pubmed: 3806354