Visual Feedback Effectiveness in Reducing Over Speeding of Moped-Riders.

active warning systems alert feedback long lasting learning effects moped-riding simulator two-wheel drivers

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 29 09 2020
accepted: 09 02 2021
entrez: 29 3 2021
pubmed: 30 3 2021
medline: 30 3 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The use of assistance systems aimed at reducing road fatalities is spreading, especially for car drivers, but less effort has been devoted to developing and testing similar systems for powered two-wheelers (PTWs). Considering that over speeding represents one of the main causal factors in road crashes and that riders are more vulnerable than drivers, in the present study we investigated the effectiveness of an assistance system which signaled speed limit violations during a simulated moped-driving task, in optimal and poor visibility conditions. Participants performed four conditions of simulated riding: one baseline condition without Feedback, one Fog condition in which visual feedback was provided so as to indicate to the participants when a speed limit (lower than that indicated by the traffic signals) was exceeded, and two post-Feedback conditions with and without Fog, respectively, in which no feedback was delivered. Results showed that participants make fewer speeding violations when the feedback is not provided, after 1 month, and regardless of the visibility condition. Finally, the feedback has been proven effective in reducing speed violations in participants with an aggressive riding style, as measured in the baseline session.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33776838
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.611603
pmc: PMC7990878
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

611603

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Tagliabue, Rossi, Gastaldi, De Cet, Freuli, Orsini, Di Stasi and Vidotto.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 07;9:2483
pubmed: 30581406
Neurosci Lett. 2006 May 22;399(3):215-9
pubmed: 16503376
Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 11;8:2126
pubmed: 29321751
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Aug;57:10-6
pubmed: 23631934
Front Psychol. 2015 Oct 29;6:1653
pubmed: 26579036
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 18;10:300
pubmed: 30833922
Exp Psychol. 2009;56(4):274-82
pubmed: 19439400
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(4):406-412
pubmed: 31059290
J Safety Res. 2020 Feb;72:225-229
pubmed: 32199567
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 11;10:536
pubmed: 30915011

Auteurs

Mariaelena Tagliabue (M)

Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

Riccardo Rossi (R)

Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

Massimiliano Gastaldi (M)

Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

Giulia De Cet (G)

Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

Francesca Freuli (F)

Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

Federico Orsini (F)

Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

Leandro L Di Stasi (LL)

Mind, Brain, and Behavior Research Center, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

Giulio Vidotto (G)

Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

Classifications MeSH