Associations with monetary values do not influence access to awareness for faces.

Continuous flashsuppression Face processing Learning Motivation Visual awareness

Journal

PeerJ
ISSN: 2167-8359
Titre abrégé: PeerJ
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101603425

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 12 06 2020
accepted: 11 01 2021
entrez: 29 3 2021
pubmed: 30 3 2021
medline: 30 3 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Human faces can convey socially relevant information in various ways. Since the early detection of such information is crucial in social contexts, socially meaningful information might also have privileged access to awareness. This is indeed suggested by previous research using faces with emotional expressions. However, the social relevance of emotional faces is confounded with their physical stimulus characteristics. Here, we sought to overcome this problem by manipulating the relevance of face stimuli through classical conditioning: Participants had to learn the association between different face exemplars and high or low amounts of positive and negative monetary outcomes. Before and after the conditioning procedure, the time these faces needed to enter awareness was probed using continuous flash suppression, a variant of binocular rivalry. While participants successfully learned the association between the face stimuli and the respective monetary outcomes, faces with a high monetary value did not enter visual awareness faster than faces with a low monetary value after conditioning, neither for rewarding nor for aversive outcomes. Our results tentatively suggest that behaviorally relevant faces do not have privileged access to awareness when the assessment of the faces' relevance is dependent on the processing of face identity, as this requires complex stimulus processing that is likely limited at pre-conscious stages.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33777515
doi: 10.7717/peerj.10875
pii: 10875
pmc: PMC7971078
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e10875

Informations de copyright

©2021 Rothkirch et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Références

Front Neurosci. 2011 May 20;5:71
pubmed: 21637321
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Nov;147(11):e1-e13
pubmed: 30372110
Psychol Sci. 2009 Aug;20(8):981-8
pubmed: 19549080
Psychiatry Res. 2009 Aug 15;168(3):242-9
pubmed: 19564050
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2006 Jan;32(1):71-9
pubmed: 16435966
Conscious Cogn. 2016 Nov;46:60-70
pubmed: 27684607
Psychol Med. 2019 Apr;49(6):980-986
pubmed: 29947310
Cereb Cortex. 2016 Aug;26(8):3453-60
pubmed: 26232987
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Nov;235(11):3333-3344
pubmed: 28815269
Neuron. 2012 Dec 6;76(5):998-1009
pubmed: 23217747
Emotion. 2007 Nov;7(4):882-6
pubmed: 18039058
Brain. 2017 Apr 1;140(4):1147-1157
pubmed: 28334960
PLoS Biol. 2006 Jul;4(8):e233
pubmed: 16802856
Behav Brain Res. 2018 Apr 2;341:26-36
pubmed: 29247750
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Oct;78(7):2253-65
pubmed: 27146992
Curr Biol. 2012 Jun 19;22(12):R477-9
pubmed: 22720676
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Dec;19(6):1057-64
pubmed: 22798023
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3):
pubmed: 24403724
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Feb;79(2):415-428
pubmed: 27905069
Psychol Methods. 2017 Jun;22(2):322-339
pubmed: 26651986
Neuron. 2005 Jan 6;45(1):169-75
pubmed: 15629711
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Apr;70:255-62
pubmed: 25744871
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 Nov;141(4):715-27
pubmed: 22468670
Emotion. 2012 Oct;12(5):988-96
pubmed: 22309728
Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Aug;17(4):536-42
pubmed: 20702874
Neuron. 2008 Apr 24;58(2):284-94
pubmed: 18439412
Behav Brain Res. 2010 Nov 12;213(1):19-26
pubmed: 20412818
Neuroimage. 2012 Sep;62(3):1717-25
pubmed: 22728149
Emotion. 2017 Dec;17(8):1199-1207
pubmed: 28406677
Psychol Bull. 2016 Sep;142(9):934-968
pubmed: 27123863
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 27;8:437
pubmed: 28396645
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015 May;10(5):690-9
pubmed: 25193945
Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Jan;19(1):35-45
pubmed: 25481216
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 27;11(4):e0150931
pubmed: 27119743
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2006 Dec;1(3):250-9
pubmed: 17332848
Exp Brain Res. 2013 Jan;224(1):35-47
pubmed: 23283417
Psychophysiology. 2019 Dec;56(12):e13463
pubmed: 31424104
J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Apr;54(4):343-9
pubmed: 11297884
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 12;13(11):e0206799
pubmed: 30419039
Front Behav Neurosci. 2017 Jan 04;10:247
pubmed: 28101010
Cognition. 2016 Apr;149:77-83
pubmed: 26807500
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 07;6:1171
pubmed: 26300841
Psychophysiology. 2018 Oct;55(10):e13203
pubmed: 30069886
Emotion. 2013 Jun;13(3):537-44
pubmed: 23398580
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 May;37(4):681-96
pubmed: 23415703
Conscious Cogn. 2011 Jun;20(2):269-79
pubmed: 20843704
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Jun;77:247-285
pubmed: 28263758
J Neurosci. 2006 Sep 13;26(37):9530-7
pubmed: 16971537
Science. 2004 Dec 17;306(5704):2061
pubmed: 15604401
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Apr;23(4):267-269
pubmed: 30795895
Conscious Cogn. 2018 Feb;58:10-19
pubmed: 29309915
Science. 2011 Jun 17;332(6036):1446-8
pubmed: 21596956

Auteurs

Marcus Rothkirch (M)

Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Berlin, Germany.

Maximilian Wieser (M)

Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Berlin, Germany.

Philipp Sterzer (P)

Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Berlin, Germany.
Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Humboldt Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Classifications MeSH