A Characteristic Chest Radiographic Pattern in the Setting of the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Journal
Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging
ISSN: 2638-6135
Titre abrégé: Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101748663
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
03
05
2020
revised:
13
08
2020
accepted:
24
08
2020
entrez:
29
3
2021
pubmed:
30
3
2021
medline:
30
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To determine the utility of chest radiography in aiding clinical diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) utilizing reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) as the standard of comparison. A retrospective study was performed of persons under investigation for COVID-19 presenting to this institution during the exponential growth phase of the COVID-19 outbreak in New Orleans (March 13-25, 2020). Three hundred seventy-six in-hospital chest radiographic examinations for 366 individual patients were reviewed along with concurrent RT-PCR tests. Two experienced radiologists categorized each chest radiograph as characteristic, nonspecific, or negative in appearance for COVID-19, utilizing well-documented COVID-19 imaging patterns. Chest radiograph categorization was compared against RT-PCR results to determine the utility of chest radiography in diagnosing COVID-19. Of the 366 patients, the study consisted of 178 male (49%) and 188 female (51%) patients with a mean age of 52.7 years (range, 17 to 98 years). Of the 376 chest radiographic examinations, 37 (10%) exhibited the characteristic COVID-19 appearance; 215 (57%) exhibited the nonspecific appearance; and 124 (33%) were considered negative for a pulmonary abnormality. Of the 376 RT-PCR tests evaluated, 200 (53%) were positive and 176 (47%) were negative. RT-PCR tests took an average of 2.5 days ± 0.7 to provide results. Sensitivity and specificity for correctly identifying COVID-19 with a characteristic chest radiographic pattern was 15.5% (31/200) and 96.6% (170/176), with a positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 83.8% (31/37) and 50.1% (170/339), respectively. The presence of patchy and/or confluent, bandlike ground-glass opacity or consolidation in a peripheral and mid to lower lung zone distribution on a chest radiograph obtained in the setting of pandemic COVID-19 was highly suggestive of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection and should be used in conjunction with clinical judgment to make a diagnosis.© RSNA, 2020.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33778626
doi: 10.1148/ryct.2020200280
pmc: PMC7605076
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e200280Informations de copyright
2021 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Disclosures of Conflicts of Interest: D.L.S. Activities related to the present article: disclosed no relevant relationships. Activities not related to the present article: author provides expert testimony for Hall Booth Smith on a matter unrelated to this article; author is paid by Genentech for speakers bureau giving nonbranded lectures on interstitial lung disease (unrelated to this article). Other relationships: disclosed no relevant relationships. J.P.G. disclosed no relevant relationships. C.B. disclosed no relevant relationships. B.S. disclosed no relevant relationships.
Références
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jun 25;58(7):1070-1076
pubmed: 32172228
Arch Virol. 2017 Jun;162(6):1617-1623
pubmed: 28220326
Acad Radiol. 2020 May;27(5):614-617
pubmed: 32276755
Korean J Radiol. 2020 May;21(5):537-540
pubmed: 32174057
Acad Radiol. 2020 May;27(5):609-613
pubmed: 32204990
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Jul;215(1):121-126
pubmed: 32174128
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 May 26;58(6):
pubmed: 32269100
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Feb;188(2):433-40
pubmed: 17242253
Eur J Radiol. 2020 May;126:108972
pubmed: 32240913
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 May;214(5):1072-1077
pubmed: 32125873
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E32-E40
pubmed: 32101510
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Jun;214(6):1287-1294
pubmed: 32134681
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Jul;215(1):87-93
pubmed: 32174129
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571
Chest. 2020 Jul;158(1):106-116
pubmed: 32275978
Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2020 Feb 12;2(1):e200026
pubmed: 33778543
Radiology. 2020 Apr;295(1):202-207
pubmed: 32017661
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 May;214(5):1078-1082
pubmed: 32108495
Acad Radiol. 2020 May;27(5):603-608
pubmed: 32204987
Radiographics. 2007 May-Jun;27(3):617-37; discussion 637-9
pubmed: 17495282
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E72-E78
pubmed: 32216717
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E46-E54
pubmed: 32155105
Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2020 May;20(5):453-454
pubmed: 32297805
J Thorac Imaging. 2020 Jul;35(4):219-227
pubmed: 32324653
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Aug;215(2):338-343
pubmed: 32181672
Nat Biotechnol. 2020 Apr;38(4):382-384
pubmed: 32265548
Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2020 Feb 13;2(1):e200028
pubmed: 33778544
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Jul;215(1):27-28
pubmed: 32301630
Eur Radiol. 2020 Aug;30(8):4381-4389
pubmed: 32193638
Jpn J Radiol. 2020 May;38(5):409-410
pubmed: 32266524
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E26-E31
pubmed: 32687455
Thorax. 2018 Sep;73(9):840-846
pubmed: 29903755
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 May;214(5):W85-W86
pubmed: 32208010
Radiographics. 2013 Nov-Dec;33(7):1951-75
pubmed: 24224590
Korean J Radiol. 2020 Apr;21(4):501-504
pubmed: 32100486
J Pharm Anal. 2020 Apr;10(2):97-101
pubmed: 32292623
ACS Cent Sci. 2020 May 27;6(5):591-605
pubmed: 32382657
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Apr 10;21(7):
pubmed: 32290293