An Open-Label Tolerability and Actual-Use Human Factors Study of Etrolizumab Autoinjector in Healthy Volunteers.

Autoinjector Crohn’s disease Etrolizumab Inflammatory bowel disease Ulcerative colitis

Journal

Advances in therapy
ISSN: 1865-8652
Titre abrégé: Adv Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8611864

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2021
Historique:
received: 23 12 2020
accepted: 03 02 2021
pubmed: 30 3 2021
medline: 22 5 2021
entrez: 29 3 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Etrolizumab is a novel, dual-action, anti-β7 integrin antibody in development for patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease. Phase 3 studies use a prefilled syringe (PFS) for etrolizumab administration. In parallel, an autoinjector (AI) is being developed to increase delivery options for patients if etrolizumab is approved. Here we describe the overall development strategy and detail the first-in-human study of this AI. This open-label study of healthy volunteers evaluated the tolerability and usability of the etrolizumab AI under development. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with greater than mild pain following injection. Adverse events (AEs) and usage errors were also assessed. Results were reported by injection site (thigh vs abdomen) and needle training (experienced vs naive). Pharmacokinetic (PK) variability between participants was an exploratory endpoint. Thirty participants completed the study; 97% of them did not experience any pain greater than mild, and 50% did not experience any pain at all. Three usage errors were observed, one of which resulted in delivery of a partial dose of etrolizumab. No patterns of usage errors were observed. Mild injection site reactions (ISRs) were reported; all resolved by the end of the study. Participants injecting into the abdomen reported more ISRs than those injecting into the thigh; needle training did not influence AE incidence or severity. Results from this first-in-human study demonstrate that single injections of etrolizumab 105 mg using an AI were well tolerated in healthy volunteers, with transient, mild pain and minimal usage errors. Results from this study also informed the design of a subsequent PK comparability study evaluating exposure of etrolizumab administered by either the PFS or the AI. Overall, the availability of an AI may provide an attractive option for patients desiring a convenient, easy-to-use delivery mechanism for etrolizumab. NCT02629744.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33778928
doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01651-8
pii: 10.1007/s12325-021-01651-8
pmc: PMC8107167
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized 0
etrolizumab I2A72G2V3J

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02629744']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Pagination

2406-2417

Références

Casellas F, López-Vivancos J, Vergara M, Malagelada JR. Impact of inflammatory bowel disease on health-related quality of life. Dig Dis. 1999;17:208–18.
doi: 10.1159/000016938
Carter MJ, Lobo AJ, Travis SP, IBD Section, British Society of Gastroenterology. Guidelines for the management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults. Gut. 2004;53(suppl 5):1–16.
doi: 10.1136/gut.2004.043372
Borren NZ, van der Woude CJ, Ananthakrishnan AN. Fatigue in IBD: epidemiology, pathophysiology and management. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;16:247–59.
doi: 10.1038/s41575-018-0091-9
Zhang YZ, Li YY. Inflammatory bowel disease: pathogenesis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:91–9.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i1.91
Abraham C, Cho JH. Inflammatory bowel disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:2066–78.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0804647
Rogler G. Gastrointestinal and liver adverse effects of drugs used for treating IBD. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2010;24:157–65.
doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2009.10.011
Zundler S, Becker E, Schulze LL, Neurath MF. Immune cell trafficking and retention in inflammatory bowel disease: mechanistic insights and therapeutic advances. Gut. 2019;68:1688–700.
doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317977
Vermeire S, O’Byrne S, Keir M, et al. Etrolizumab as induction therapy for ulcerative colitis: a randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2014;384:309–18.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60661-9
Sandborn WJ, Vermeire S, Tyrrell H, et al. Etrolizumab for the treatment of ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease: an overview of the phase 3 clinical program. Adv Ther. 2020;37:3417–31.
doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01366-2
Kivitz A, Cohen S, Dowd JE, et al. Clinical assessment of pain, tolerability, and preference of an autoinjection pen versus a prefilled syringe for patient self-administration of the fully human, monoclonal antibody adalimumab: the TOUCH trial. Clin Ther. 2006;28:1619–29.
doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.10.006
Kivitz A, Segurado OG. Humira pen: a novel autoinjection device for subcutaneous injection of the fully human monoclonal antibody adalimumab. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2007;4:109–16.
doi: 10.1586/17434440.4.2.109
Borras-Blasco J, Gracia-Perez A, Rosique-Robles JD, Castera MD, Abad FJ. Acceptability of switching adalimumab from a prefilled syringe to an autoinjection pen. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2010;10:301–7.
doi: 10.1517/14712590903530633
Vermeire S, D’Heygere F, Nakad A, et al. Preference for a prefilled syringe or an auto-injection device for delivering golimumab in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: a randomized crossover study. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018;12:1193–202.
doi: 10.2147/PPA.S154181
Lim WH, Chan D, Boudville N, et al. Patients’ perceptions of subcutaneous delivery of darbepoetin alfa by autoinjector prefilled pen versus prefilled syringe: a randomized, crossover study. Clin Ther. 2012;34:1948–53.
doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.07.012
Tischer B, Mehl A. Patients’ and nurses’ preferences for autoinjectors for rheumatoid arthritis: results of a European survey. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018;12:1413–24.
doi: 10.2147/PPA.S169339
Thakur K, Biberger A, Handrich A, Rezk MF. Patient perceptions and preferences of two etanercept autoinjectors for rheumatoid arthritis: findings from a patient survey in Europe. Rheumatol Ther. 2016;3:245–56.
doi: 10.1007/s40744-016-0048-9

Auteurs

Helen Tyrrell (H)

Roche Products Limited, Welwyn Garden City, UK. helen.tyrrell@roche.com.

Renato Ravanello (R)

Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.

Jennifer Pulley (J)

Roche Products Limited, Welwyn Garden City, UK.

Meina Tao Tang (MT)

Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.

Wenhui Zhang (W)

Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.

Mariam Abouhossein (M)

Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.

Swati Tole (S)

Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH