Comparable Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Etrolizumab Administered by Prefilled Syringe or Autoinjector in a Randomized Trial in Healthy Volunteers.
Auto-injector
Crohn’s disease
Etrolizumab
Inflammatory bowel disease
Pharmacokinetic comparability
Prefilled syringe
Ulcerative colitis
Journal
Advances in therapy
ISSN: 1865-8652
Titre abrégé: Adv Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8611864
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2021
05 2021
Historique:
received:
23
12
2020
accepted:
10
02
2021
pubmed:
30
3
2021
medline:
22
5
2021
entrez:
29
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Etrolizumab is a novel, dual-action anti-β7 integrin antibody studied in phase 3 trials in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. An autoinjector (AI) is being developed in parallel to complement the prefilled syringe with needle safety device (PFS-NSD) for subcutaneous (SC) administration in these trials. Here we demonstrate the comparable pharmacokinetics, tolerability, and safety of both devices. This randomized, open-label, two-part study in healthy participants evaluated the comparability of etrolizumab exposure between the AI and the PFS-NSD. Part 1 (pilot) involved a small number of participants, and initial results were used to finalize the design of the larger part 2 (pivotal) study. In both parts, participants were randomly assigned to receive a single SC dose of etrolizumab 105 mg by AI or PFS-NSD. Randomization was stratified by body weight. Primary pharmacokinetic outcomes were C One hundred and eighty healthy participants (part 1, n = 30; part 2, n = 150) received a single SC dose of etrolizumab by AI or PFS-NSD. Primary pharmacokinetic results from part 1 supported modification of the part 2 study design. Results from part 2 demonstrated that etrolizumab exposure was equivalent between devices, with geometric mean ratios (GMRs) between AI and PFS-NSD of 102% (90% confidence interval [CI] 94.2-111) for C This pharmacokinetic study demonstrated that single SC injections of etrolizumab 105 mg using an AI or a PFS-NSD resulted in equivalent etrolizumab exposure and similar safety and tolerability in healthy participants. Taken together, these results support the use of an AI for etrolizumab administration. NCT02996019.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33778929
doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01661-6
pii: 10.1007/s12325-021-01661-6
pmc: PMC8107163
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
etrolizumab
I2A72G2V3J
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02996019']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Pagination
2418-2434Références
Casellas F, López-Vivancos J, Vergara M, Malagelada JR. Impact of inflammatory bowel disease on health-related quality of life. Dig Dis. 1999;17:208–18.
doi: 10.1159/000016938
Borren NZ, van der Woude CJ, Ananthakrishnan AN. Fatigue in IBD: epidemiology, pathophysiology and management. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;16:247–59.
doi: 10.1038/s41575-018-0091-9
Carter MJ, Lobo AJ, Travis SP, IBD Section of the British Society of Gastroenterology. Guidelines for the management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults. Gut. 2004;53(suppl 5):V1–16.
doi: 10.1136/gut.2004.043372
Zhang YZ, Li YY. Inflammatory bowel disease: pathogenesis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:91–9.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i1.91
Abraham C, Cho JH. Inflammatory bowel disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:2066–78.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0804647
Rogler G. Gastrointestinal and liver adverse effects of drugs used for treating IBD. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2010;24:157–65.
doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2009.10.011
Cepek KL, Parker CM, Madara JL, Brenner MB. Integrin alpha E beta 7 mediates adhesion of T lymphocytes to epithelial cells. J Immunol. 1993;150(part 1):3459–70.
pubmed: 8468482
Andrew DP, Berlin C, Honda S, et al. Distinct but overlapping epitopes are involved in α4β7-mediated adhesion to vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, mucosal addressin-1, fibronectin, and lymphocyte aggregation. J Immunol. 1994;153:3847–61.
pubmed: 7523506
Zundler S, Becker E, Schulze LL, Neurath MF. Immune cell trafficking and retention in inflammatory bowel disease: mechanistic insights and therapeutic advances. Gut. 2019;68:1688–700.
doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317977
Vermeire S, O’Byrne S, Keir M, et al. Etrolizumab as induction therapy for ulcerative colitis: a randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2014;384:309–18.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60661-9
Sandborn WJ, Vermeire S, Tyrrell H, et al. Etrolizumab for the treatment of ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease: an overview of the phase 3 clinical program. Adv Ther. 2020;37:3417–31.
doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01366-2
Kivitz A, Cohen S, Dowd JE, et al. Clinical assessment of pain, tolerability, and preference of an autoinjection pen versus a prefilled syringe for patient self-administration of the fully human, monoclonal antibody adalimumab: the TOUCH trial. Clin Ther. 2006;28:1619–29.
doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.10.006
Kivitz A, Segurado OG. HUMIRA pen: a novel autoinjection device for subcutaneous injection of the fully human monoclonal antibody adalimumab. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2007;4:109–16.
doi: 10.1586/17434440.4.2.109
Borras-Blasco J, Gracia-Perez A, Rosique-Robles JD, Castera MD, Abad FJ. Acceptability of switching adalimumab from a prefilled syringe to an autoinjection pen. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2010;10:301–7.
doi: 10.1517/14712590903530633
Vermeire S, D’Heygere F, Nakad A, et al. Preference for a prefilled syringe or an auto-injection device for delivering golimumab in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: a randomized crossover study. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018;12:1193–202.
doi: 10.2147/PPA.S154181
US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry: bioavailability studies submitted in NDAs or INDs—general considerations. Published February 21, 2019. https://www.fda.gov/media/121311/download . Accessed 1 Feb 2021.
US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry: statistical approaches to establishing bioequivalence. Published February 2001. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/statistical-approaches-establishing-bioequivalence . Accessed 18 Dec 2020.
Shin D, Lee Y, Jeong D, Ellis-Pegler R. Comparative pharmacokinetics of an adalimumab biosimilar SB5 administered via autoinjector or prefilled syringe in healthy subjects. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2018;12:3799–805.
doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S169082
Ramael S, Van Hoorick B, Tiessen R, et al. Similar pharmacokinetics of the adalimumab (Humira
doi: 10.1007/s40744-018-0119-1
Rutgeerts PJ, Fedorak RN, Hommes DW, et al. A randomised phase I study of etrolizumab (rhuMAb beta7) in moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. Gut. 2013;62:1122–30.
doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301769
Anumolu SS, Lindgren S, Vemula J, et al. Bioequivalence of canakinumab injected subcutaneously via an autoinjector device or a prefilled safety syringe device in healthy subjects. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2018;7:829–36.
doi: 10.1002/cpdd.455
Tang MT, Keir ME, Erickson R, et al. Review article: nonclinical and clinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of etrolizumab, an antiβ7 integrin therapy for inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018;47:1440–52.
doi: 10.1111/apt.14631