Clinical performance of lung ultrasound in predicting ARDS morphology.
ARDS
ARDS morphology
Bedside tests
Lung ultrasound
Point of care diagnostic tests
Respiratory monitoring
Journal
Annals of intensive care
ISSN: 2110-5820
Titre abrégé: Ann Intensive Care
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101562873
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Mar 2021
29 Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
31
10
2020
accepted:
09
03
2021
entrez:
29
3
2021
pubmed:
30
3
2021
medline:
30
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To assess diagnostic performance of lung ultrasound (LUS) in identifying ARDS morphology (focal vs non-focal), compared with the gold standard computed tomography. Mechanically ventilated ARDS patients undergoing lung computed tomography and ultrasound were enrolled. Twelve fields, were evaluated. LUS score was graded from 0 (normal) to 3 (consolidation) according to B-lines extent. Total and regional LUS score as the sum of the four ventral (LUS Forty-seven patients with ARDS (25 training set and 22 validation set) were enrolled. LUS LUS had a valuable performance in distinguishing ARDS morphology.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
To assess diagnostic performance of lung ultrasound (LUS) in identifying ARDS morphology (focal vs non-focal), compared with the gold standard computed tomography.
METHODS
METHODS
Mechanically ventilated ARDS patients undergoing lung computed tomography and ultrasound were enrolled. Twelve fields, were evaluated. LUS score was graded from 0 (normal) to 3 (consolidation) according to B-lines extent. Total and regional LUS score as the sum of the four ventral (LUS
RESULTS
RESULTS
Forty-seven patients with ARDS (25 training set and 22 validation set) were enrolled. LUS
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
LUS had a valuable performance in distinguishing ARDS morphology.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33779834
doi: 10.1186/s13613-021-00837-1
pii: 10.1186/s13613-021-00837-1
pmc: PMC8006629
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
51Références
Chest. 2008 Jul;134(1):117-25
pubmed: 18403664
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan 15;175(2):160-6
pubmed: 17038660
Crit Care Med. 2010 Apr;38(4):1108-17
pubmed: 20154600
Intensive Care Med. 2000 Jul;26(7):857-69
pubmed: 10990099
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Oct;40(10):1468-74
pubmed: 25023524
Intensive Care Med. 2013 Jan;39(1):74-84
pubmed: 23052950
Ultraschall Med. 2017 Oct;38(5):530-537
pubmed: 28291991
JAMA. 2012 Jun 20;307(23):2526-33
pubmed: 22797452
Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Oct;7(10):870-880
pubmed: 31399381
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Feb 1;183(3):341-7
pubmed: 20851923
JAMA. 2010 Mar 3;303(9):865-73
pubmed: 20197533
Intensive Care Med. 2012 Apr;38(4):577-91
pubmed: 22392031
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Apr 15;165(8):1182-6
pubmed: 11956065
Crit Care Med. 2012 Jul;40(7):2064-72
pubmed: 22584759
Crit Care Med. 2010 Jan;38(1):84-92
pubmed: 19633538
Crit Care Med. 2004 Apr;32(4):1018-27
pubmed: 15071395
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 10;377(6):562-572
pubmed: 28792873
Crit Care Med. 2020 Feb;48(2):151-157
pubmed: 31939782
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2019 Jul 25;7(Suppl 1):44
pubmed: 31346914
N Engl J Med. 2006 Apr 27;354(17):1775-86
pubmed: 16641394
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Sep 1;180(5):415-23
pubmed: 19542479
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2008 Apr 29;6:16
pubmed: 18442425
Chest. 2009 Oct;136(4):1014-1020
pubmed: 19809049
Crit Care Med. 2018 Nov;46(11):1761-1768
pubmed: 30048331
Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Dec;7(12):e38
pubmed: 31777393
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Jan;40(1):57-65
pubmed: 24158410
Intensive Care Med. 2010 Jun;36(6):999-1007
pubmed: 20221746