Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Patients With Valvular Atrial Fibrillation : A Population-Based Cohort Study.
Administration, Oral
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anticoagulants
/ adverse effects
Atrial Fibrillation
/ drug therapy
Cerebral Hemorrhage
/ chemically induced
Comparative Effectiveness Research
Dabigatran
/ adverse effects
Embolism
/ prevention & control
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage
/ chemically induced
Humans
Ischemic Stroke
/ prevention & control
Male
Propensity Score
Pyrazoles
/ adverse effects
Pyridones
/ adverse effects
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Rivaroxaban
/ adverse effects
Treatment Outcome
Warfarin
/ adverse effects
Journal
Annals of internal medicine
ISSN: 1539-3704
Titre abrégé: Ann Intern Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372351
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2021
07 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
30
3
2021
medline:
9
9
2021
entrez:
29
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used in place of warfarin, but evidence about their effectiveness and safety in patients with valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) remains limited. To assess the effectiveness and safety of DOACs compared with warfarin in patients with valvular AF. New-user retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study. U.S.-based commercial health care database from 1 January 2010 to 30 June 2019. Adults with valvular AF who were newly prescribed DOACs or warfarin. The primary effectiveness outcome was a composite of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism. The primary safety outcome was a composite of intracranial or gastrointestinal bleeding. Among a total of 56 336 patients with valvular AF matched on propensity score, use of DOACs (vs. warfarin) was associated with lower risk for ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (hazard ratio [HR], 0.64 [95% CI, 0.59 to 0.70]) and major bleeding events (HR, 0.67 [CI, 0.63 to 0.72]). The results for the effectiveness and safety outcomes remained consistent for apixaban (HRs, 0.54 [CI, 0.47 to 0.61] and 0.52 [CI, 0.47 to 0.57], respectively) and rivaroxaban (HRs, 0.74 [CI, 0.64 to 0.86] and 0.87 [CI, 0.79 to 0.96], respectively); with dabigatran, results were consistent for the major bleeding outcome (HR, 0.81 [CI, 0.68 to 0.97]) but not for effectiveness (HR, 1.03 [CI, 0.81 to 1.31]). Relatively short follow-up; inability to ascertain disease severity. In this comparative effectiveness study using practice-based claims data, patients with valvular AF who were new users of DOACs had lower risks for ischemic stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding than new users of warfarin. These data may be used to guide risk-benefit discussions regarding anticoagulant choices for patients with valvular AF. None.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used in place of warfarin, but evidence about their effectiveness and safety in patients with valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) remains limited.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the effectiveness and safety of DOACs compared with warfarin in patients with valvular AF.
DESIGN
New-user retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.
SETTING
U.S.-based commercial health care database from 1 January 2010 to 30 June 2019.
PARTICIPANTS
Adults with valvular AF who were newly prescribed DOACs or warfarin.
MEASUREMENTS
The primary effectiveness outcome was a composite of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism. The primary safety outcome was a composite of intracranial or gastrointestinal bleeding.
RESULTS
Among a total of 56 336 patients with valvular AF matched on propensity score, use of DOACs (vs. warfarin) was associated with lower risk for ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (hazard ratio [HR], 0.64 [95% CI, 0.59 to 0.70]) and major bleeding events (HR, 0.67 [CI, 0.63 to 0.72]). The results for the effectiveness and safety outcomes remained consistent for apixaban (HRs, 0.54 [CI, 0.47 to 0.61] and 0.52 [CI, 0.47 to 0.57], respectively) and rivaroxaban (HRs, 0.74 [CI, 0.64 to 0.86] and 0.87 [CI, 0.79 to 0.96], respectively); with dabigatran, results were consistent for the major bleeding outcome (HR, 0.81 [CI, 0.68 to 0.97]) but not for effectiveness (HR, 1.03 [CI, 0.81 to 1.31]).
LIMITATION
Relatively short follow-up; inability to ascertain disease severity.
CONCLUSION
In this comparative effectiveness study using practice-based claims data, patients with valvular AF who were new users of DOACs had lower risks for ischemic stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding than new users of warfarin. These data may be used to guide risk-benefit discussions regarding anticoagulant choices for patients with valvular AF.
PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE
None.
Substances chimiques
Anticoagulants
0
Pyrazoles
0
Pyridones
0
apixaban
3Z9Y7UWC1J
Warfarin
5Q7ZVV76EI
Rivaroxaban
9NDF7JZ4M3
Dabigatran
I0VM4M70GC
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
910-919Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : ErratumIn