Aqueductal CSF stroke volume measurements may drive management of shunted idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus patients.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 03 2021
29 03 2021
Historique:
received:
02
11
2020
accepted:
08
03
2021
entrez:
30
3
2021
pubmed:
31
3
2021
medline:
27
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
CSF shunting with adjustable valve is the treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. The opening pressure valve setting is left to the neurosurgeon's experience. Aqueductal CSF stroke volume by phase-contrast magnetic resonance measures the CSF passing through the Sylvian aqueduct and it changes with intracranial hydrodynamics. We sought to identify a window of stroke volume differences associated with the best clinical outcome and lowest rate of complications. The records of 69 patients were reviewed. At every clinical check, stroke volume, opening pressure valve, clinical outcome, and CSF overdrainage were analyzed. The correlation between stroke volume differences and negative outcome was also analyzed. The median follow-up was 2.3 years (range 0.3-10.4 years). The odds of negative outcome between two consecutive checks significantly increased by 16% (95%CI 4-28%, p = 0.006). Taking the lowest risk group as reference, the odds ratio of negative outcome was 1.16 (95%CI 0.51-2.63, p = 0.726) for SV differences less than - 37.6 µL, while it was 1.96 (95%CI 0.97-3.98, p = 0.062) for stroke volume changes above + 23.1 µL. Maintaining stroke volume values within a definite range might help maximize clinical benefit and avoid the risk of CSF overdrainage.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33782441
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86350-8
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-86350-8
pmc: PMC8007697
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
7095Références
J Neurol Sci. 1965 Jul-Aug;2(4):307-27
pubmed: 5889177
N Engl J Med. 1965 Jul 15;273:117-26
pubmed: 14303656
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 May;36(5):831-8
pubmed: 25355813
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 Sep;30(8):1580-6
pubmed: 19461060
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 Jan;29(1):192-7
pubmed: 17925364
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Sep;36(9):1623-30
pubmed: 25977480
Neurology. 2015 Dec 8;85(23):2063-71
pubmed: 26644048
Neurol Clin. 2019 Nov;37(4):835-845
pubmed: 31563235
Neurosurgery. 2002 Dec;51(6):1392-400; discussion 1400-2
pubmed: 12445344
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 Mar;40(3):453-459
pubmed: 30792248
J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98
pubmed: 1202204
J Neurosurg. 2018 Oct;129(4):1078-1084
pubmed: 29148901
J Neurosurg. 2018 Nov 1;:1-6
pubmed: 30497143
J Neurosurg. 2001 Sep;95(3):432-4
pubmed: 11565864
Radiology. 1996 Feb;198(2):523-9
pubmed: 8596861
Radiology. 1986 Jun;159(3):611-6
pubmed: 3704142
J Neurosurg. 2018 Nov 1;:1-7
pubmed: 30497157
J Clin Neurosci. 2009 Apr;16(4):514-8
pubmed: 19195891
Neurosurgery. 2007 Jan;60(1):124-9; discussion 129-30
pubmed: 17228260
Neurosurgery. 2005 Sep;57(3 Suppl):S17-28; discussion ii-v
pubmed: 16160426