Chemical Variation among Castes, Female Life Stages and Populations of the Facultative Eusocial Sweat Bee Halictus rubicundus (Hymenoptera: Halictidae).
Animals
Female
Alkenes
/ chemistry
Animal Communication
Bees
Behavior, Animal
Biological Evolution
Complex Mixtures
/ chemistry
Europe
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry
Geography
Isomerism
Lactones
/ chemistry
Macrocyclic Compounds
/ chemistry
North America
Odorants
Pheromones
/ chemistry
Reproduction
Chemical communication
Facultative eusocial behavior
Halictid bee
Population dialect
Regulation of reproduction
Journal
Journal of chemical ecology
ISSN: 1573-1561
Titre abrégé: J Chem Ecol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7505563
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2021
May 2021
Historique:
received:
02
10
2020
accepted:
17
03
2021
revised:
05
03
2021
pubmed:
1
4
2021
medline:
12
8
2021
entrez:
31
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In eusocial insects, chemical communication is crucial for mediating many aspects of social activities, especially the regulation of reproduction. Though queen signals are known to decrease ovarian activation of workers in highly eusocial species, little is known about their evolution. In contrast, some primitively eusocial species are thought to control worker reproduction through physical aggression by the queen rather than via pheromones, suggesting the evolutionary establishment of chemical signals with more derived sociality. However, studies supporting this hypothesis are largely missing. Socially polymorphic halictid bees, such as Halictus rubicundus, with social and solitary populations in both Europe and North America, offer excellent opportunities to illuminate the evolution of caste-specific signals. Here we compared the chemical profiles of social and solitary populations from both continents and tested whether (i) population or social level affect chemical dissimilarity and whether (ii) caste-specific patterns reflect a conserved queen signal. Our results demonstrate unique odor profiles of European and North American populations, mainly due to different isomers of n-alkenes and macrocyclic lactones; chemical differences may be indicative of phylogeographic drift in odor profiles. We also found common compounds overproduced in queens compared to workers in both populations, indicating a potential conserved queen signal. However, North American populations have a lower caste-specific chemical dissimilarity than European populations which raises the question if both use different mechanisms of regulating reproductive division of labor. Therefore, our study gives new insights into the evolution of eusocial behavior and the role of chemical communication in the inhibition of reproduction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33788128
doi: 10.1007/s10886-021-01267-w
pii: 10.1007/s10886-021-01267-w
pmc: PMC8116247
doi:
Substances chimiques
Alkenes
0
Complex Mixtures
0
Lactones
0
Macrocyclic Compounds
0
Pheromones
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
406-419Références
Bioessays. 2015 Jul;37(7):808-21
pubmed: 25916998
Trends Ecol Evol. 1997 Dec;12(12):468-74
pubmed: 21238162
Curr Biol. 2020 Mar 23;30(6):1136-1141.e3
pubmed: 32059770
Science. 1979 Nov 30;206(4422):1095-7
pubmed: 17787485
J Evol Biol. 2013 Jul;26(7):1549-58
pubmed: 23662630
Annu Rev Entomol. 2006;51:581-608
pubmed: 16332224
R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Jan 06;3(1):150599
pubmed: 26909189
Naturwissenschaften. 2008 Jun;95(6):515-22
pubmed: 18320160
Syst Biol. 2003 Feb;52(1):23-36
pubmed: 12554437
J Chem Ecol. 2010 Aug;36(8):855-63
pubmed: 20509042
Annu Rev Entomol. 2008;53:523-42
pubmed: 17877458
Science. 2014 Jan 17;343(6168):287-90
pubmed: 24436417
J Chem Ecol. 2016 Oct;42(10):1052-1062
pubmed: 27832346
Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2017 Aug;22:79-84
pubmed: 28805643
Nat Prod Rep. 2015 Jul;32(7):1042-66
pubmed: 25976887
J Exp Biol. 2018 May 11;221(Pt 9):
pubmed: 29615527
Annu Rev Entomol. 2001;46:31-78
pubmed: 11112163
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Jul 7;273(1594):1643-9
pubmed: 16769636
Biom J. 2008 Jun;50(3):346-63
pubmed: 18481363
J Chem Ecol. 2011 Nov;37(11):1263-75
pubmed: 22083225
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1999 Dec;13(3):605-18
pubmed: 10620417
Insects. 2019 Nov 21;10(12):
pubmed: 31766459
J Chem Ecol. 2017 Jun;43(6):563-572
pubmed: 28647839
BMC Genomics. 2014 Jan 28;15:75
pubmed: 24472515
J Chem Ecol. 2018 Sep;44(9):827-837
pubmed: 30014321
Curr Biol. 2010 Nov 23;20(22):2028-31
pubmed: 21055940
J Chem Ecol. 2016 Nov;42(11):1175-1180
pubmed: 27722875
J Exp Biol. 2016 Feb;219(Pt 3):419-30
pubmed: 26847561
Cell. 2016 Mar 10;164(6):1277-1287
pubmed: 26967293
Evolution. 2002 Feb;56(2):330-41
pubmed: 11926501
Science. 1965 Sep 3;149(3688):1064-71
pubmed: 17737837
Mol Ecol. 2010 Aug;19(16):3351-63
pubmed: 20666996
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2012 Dec;65(3):926-39
pubmed: 22982437
R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Oct 19;3(10):160576
pubmed: 27853577
Heredity (Edinb). 2021 Feb;126(2):219-234
pubmed: 33139902
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jan 8;99(1):286-90
pubmed: 11782550
J Chem Ecol. 2017 Dec;43(11-12):1066-1072
pubmed: 29147977
Annu Rev Entomol. 2014;59:299-319
pubmed: 24160431