Urban storm water infiltration systems are not reliable sinks for biocides: evidence from column experiments.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
31 03 2021
Historique:
received: 15 09 2020
accepted: 15 03 2021
entrez: 1 4 2021
pubmed: 2 4 2021
medline: 2 4 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Groundwater quality in urban catchments is endangered by the input of biocides, such as those used in facade paints to suppress algae and fungal growth and washed off by heavy rainfall. Their retention in storm water infiltration systems (SIS) depends, in addition to their molecular properties, on chemical properties and structure of the integrated soil layer. These soil properties change over time and thus possibly also the relevance of preferential flow paths, e.g. due to ongoing biological activity. To investigate the mobility of biocides in SIS, we analyzed the breakthrough of differently adsorbing tracers (bromide, uranine, sulforhodamine B) and commonly used biocides (diuron, terbutryn, octhilinone) in laboratory column experiments of undisturbed soil cores of SIS, covering ages from 3 to 18 years. Despite similar soil texture and chemical soil properties, retention of tracers and biocides differed distinctly between SIS. Tracer and biocide breakthrough ranged from 54% and 5%, to 96% and 54%, respectively. We related the reduced solute retention to preferential transport in macropores as could be confirmed by brilliant blue staining. Our results suggest an increasing risk of groundwater pollution with increasing number of macropores related to biological activity and the age of SIS.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33790334
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86387-9
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-86387-9
pmc: PMC8012575
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

7242

Références

Water Res. 2011 May;45(11):3453-60
pubmed: 21529881
J Contam Hydrol. 2007 Apr 1;91(1-2):26-42
pubmed: 17174006
Water Sci Technol. 2011;63(9):1974-82
pubmed: 21902038
Water Environ Res. 2006 Mar;78(3):284-93
pubmed: 16629269
Environ Sci Eur. 2016;28(1):6
pubmed: 27752441
Water Sci Technol. 2010;62(10):2338-45
pubmed: 21076220
Environ Sci Technol. 2002 Aug 15;36(16):3571-6
pubmed: 12214651
Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2013;221:1-105
pubmed: 23090630
Soil Org. 2019 Dec 1;91(3):114-138
pubmed: 31908681
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Apr 19;50(8):4289-95
pubmed: 26963769
Science. 2018 Jul 20;361(6399):222-224
pubmed: 30026210
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Feb 1;579:881-892
pubmed: 27884529
Environ Health Perspect. 1989 Nov;83:145-77
pubmed: 2695323
Ground Water. 2012 Nov-Dec;50(6):820-4
pubmed: 22582871
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Feb;27(4):3768-3791
pubmed: 31656996
Water Res. 2012 Dec 15;46(20):6787-98
pubmed: 22687523
Environ Int. 2020 Apr;137:105533
pubmed: 32113087
Chemosphere. 2011 Nov;85(8):1233-40
pubmed: 21855108
Environ Sci Technol. 2012 May 15;46(10):5497-503
pubmed: 22524149
J Contam Hydrol. 2007 Dec 7;94(3-4):261-76
pubmed: 17698243
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Aug 15;730:139059
pubmed: 32416506
J Contam Hydrol. 2015 Oct;181:161-71
pubmed: 26141344
Water Res. 2018 Nov 1;144:413-423
pubmed: 30059904
Sci Total Environ. 2009 Jul 1;407(14):4297-302
pubmed: 19411091
Nat Methods. 2012 Jun 28;9(7):676-82
pubmed: 22743772
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Apr;24(12):11752-11763
pubmed: 28337625
Water Res. 2012 Dec 15;46(20):6683-92
pubmed: 22209279
J Contam Hydrol. 2006 May 30;85(3-4):271-86
pubmed: 16563561
Water Res. 2014 Jun 1;56:66-76
pubmed: 24657324
Water Sci Technol. 2011;63(10):2279-86
pubmed: 21977650
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 20;652:836-850
pubmed: 30380490
Environ Sci Technol. 2001 Feb 15;35(4):753-60
pubmed: 11349288
Environ Monit Assess. 2013 May;185(5):3697-710
pubmed: 22899460
Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Apr 4;51(7):3694-3702
pubmed: 28287716
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Dec 1;536:784-792
pubmed: 26254078
Environ Pollut. 2006 Jul;142(1):1-16
pubmed: 16297517
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Dec 31;607-608:413-432
pubmed: 28704668
J Environ Radioact. 2003;68(1):47-64
pubmed: 12726698
J Contam Hydrol. 2005 Dec;81(1-4):63-88
pubmed: 16169123

Auteurs

Marcus Bork (M)

Hydrology, Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Freiburg, 79098, Freiburg, Germany. marcus.bork@hydrology.uni-freiburg.de.
Soil Ecology, Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Freiburg, 79098, Freiburg, Germany. marcus.bork@hydrology.uni-freiburg.de.

Jens Lange (J)

Hydrology, Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Freiburg, 79098, Freiburg, Germany.

Markus Graf-Rosenfellner (M)

Soil Ecology, Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Freiburg, 79098, Freiburg, Germany.

Birte Hensen (B)

Institute of Sustainable and Environmental Chemistry, Leuphana University Lüneburg, 21335, Lünbeburg, Germany.

Oliver Olsson (O)

Institute of Sustainable and Environmental Chemistry, Leuphana University Lüneburg, 21335, Lünbeburg, Germany.

Thomas Hartung (T)

Soil Ecology, Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Freiburg, 79098, Freiburg, Germany.

Elena Fernández-Pascual (E)

Institute of Sustainable and Environmental Chemistry, Leuphana University Lüneburg, 21335, Lünbeburg, Germany.
Environmental Research Institute, University College Cork, Cork, T23 XE10, Ireland.

Friederike Lang (F)

Soil Ecology, Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Freiburg, 79098, Freiburg, Germany.

Classifications MeSH