Capacity Building of Health Professionals on Genetics and Genomics Practice: Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Distance Learning Training Course for Italian Physicians.

capacity building distance learning genetics genomics literacy medical education omics sciences problem-based learning

Journal

Frontiers in genetics
ISSN: 1664-8021
Titre abrégé: Front Genet
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101560621

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 09 11 2020
accepted: 22 02 2021
entrez: 1 4 2021
pubmed: 2 4 2021
medline: 2 4 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The rapid spread of personalized medicine requires professionals to manage the "omics revolution." Therefore, the genetics/genomics literacy of healthcare professionals should be in line with the continuous advances in this field, in order to implement its potential implications for diagnosis, control and treatment of diseases. The present study investigates the effectiveness of a distance learning course on genetics and genomics targeted at medical doctors. In the context of a project funded by the Italian Ministry of Health, we developed a distance learning course, entitled Genetics and Genomics practice. The course focused on genetic/genomics testing, pharmacogenetics and oncogenomics and was developed according to andragogical training methods (Problem-based Learning and Case-based Learning). We used a pre-test vs. post-test study design to assess knowledge improvement on a set of 10 Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs). We analyzed the proportion of correct answers for each question pre and post-test and the mean score difference stratified by gender, age, professional status and medical discipline. Moreover, the test was submitted to the participants 8 months after the conclusion of the course (follow-up), in order to assess the retained knowledge. The course was completed by 1,637 Italian physicians, most of which were primary care physicians (20.8%), public health professionals (11.5%) and specialist pediatricians (10.6%). The proportion of correct answers increased in the post-test for all the MCQs. The overall mean score significantly increased, from 59.46 in the pre-test to 71.42 in the post-test ( Genomics literacy among healthcare professionals is essential to ensure optimal translation to healthcare delivery of research. The results of this course suggest that distance-learning training in genetic/genomics practice represents an effective method to improve physicians' knowledge in the immediate and mid-term time scale. A preprint version of this paper is available at: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-10083/v1.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The rapid spread of personalized medicine requires professionals to manage the "omics revolution." Therefore, the genetics/genomics literacy of healthcare professionals should be in line with the continuous advances in this field, in order to implement its potential implications for diagnosis, control and treatment of diseases. The present study investigates the effectiveness of a distance learning course on genetics and genomics targeted at medical doctors.
METHODS METHODS
In the context of a project funded by the Italian Ministry of Health, we developed a distance learning course, entitled Genetics and Genomics practice. The course focused on genetic/genomics testing, pharmacogenetics and oncogenomics and was developed according to andragogical training methods (Problem-based Learning and Case-based Learning). We used a pre-test vs. post-test study design to assess knowledge improvement on a set of 10 Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs). We analyzed the proportion of correct answers for each question pre and post-test and the mean score difference stratified by gender, age, professional status and medical discipline. Moreover, the test was submitted to the participants 8 months after the conclusion of the course (follow-up), in order to assess the retained knowledge.
RESULTS RESULTS
The course was completed by 1,637 Italian physicians, most of which were primary care physicians (20.8%), public health professionals (11.5%) and specialist pediatricians (10.6%). The proportion of correct answers increased in the post-test for all the MCQs. The overall mean score significantly increased, from 59.46 in the pre-test to 71.42 in the post-test (
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Genomics literacy among healthcare professionals is essential to ensure optimal translation to healthcare delivery of research. The results of this course suggest that distance-learning training in genetic/genomics practice represents an effective method to improve physicians' knowledge in the immediate and mid-term time scale. A preprint version of this paper is available at: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-10083/v1.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33790945
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.626685
pmc: PMC8005606
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

626685

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Calabrò, Tognetto, Mazzaccara, Barbina, Carbone, Guerrera, Di Pucchio, Federici, Ricciardi and Boccia.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 21;1:CD011736
pubmed: 29355907
Epidemiol Prev. 2014 Nov-Dec;38(6 Suppl 2):29-34
pubmed: 25759340
Lancet Neurol. 2015 Jan;14(1):16-8
pubmed: 25496887
Genes (Basel). 2010 May 25;1(1):38-69
pubmed: 24710010
Science. 2015 Jul 3;349(6243):37-8
pubmed: 26138968
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jan 11;19(1):19
pubmed: 30635068
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Oct 22;20(1):381
pubmed: 33092583
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):e421-44
pubmed: 22578051
Eur J Public Health. 2014 Jun;24(3):349-50
pubmed: 24860145
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2016 Apr 27;3:
pubmed: 29349306
BMC Med Educ. 2004 Jul 19;4:10
pubmed: 15260883
Ig Sanita Pubbl. 2019 Mar-Apr;75(2):105-124
pubmed: 31377756
Front Genet. 2019 Aug 02;10:712
pubmed: 31428139
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Oct 1;27(5):931-937
pubmed: 27687585
JAMA. 2011 Sep 7;306(9):989-90
pubmed: 21900139
Med Educ. 2011 Aug;45(8):792-806
pubmed: 21752076
Acad Med. 1993 Aug;68(8):625-32
pubmed: 8352875
Methods Mol Biol. 2011;719:3-30
pubmed: 21370077

Auteurs

Giovanna Elisa Calabrò (GE)

Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

Alessia Tognetto (A)

Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

Alfonso Mazzaccara (A)

Servizio Formazione - Presidenza, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.

Donatella Barbina (D)

Servizio Formazione - Presidenza, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.

Pietro Carbone (P)

Servizio Formazione - Presidenza, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.

Debora Guerrera (D)

Servizio Formazione - Presidenza, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.

Alessandra Di Pucchio (A)

Servizio Formazione - Presidenza, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.

Antonio Federici (A)

Direzione Generale Prevenzione Sanitaria, Ministero della Salute, Rome, Italy.

Walter Ricciardi (W)

Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

Stefania Boccia (S)

Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health - Public Health Area, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Classifications MeSH