A bibliometric analysis of the 50 most influential publications on distal biceps repair.
Bibliometric review
Biceps injury
Biceps publication analysis
Distal biceps repair
Tendon repair
Journal
European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie
ISSN: 1432-1068
Titre abrégé: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 9518037
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2022
Feb 2022
Historique:
received:
10
01
2021
accepted:
23
03
2021
pubmed:
2
4
2021
medline:
27
1
2022
entrez:
1
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this bibliometric study was to identify and analyze the most cited publications on acute distal biceps repair. Using the Clarivate Analytics Web of Science database, we searched for the top 50 most cited publications on acute distal biceps repair and analyzed them based on various metrics. The top 50 publications were cited a total of 3171 times and approximately 151 times per year. However, although the literature on the topic is quite extensive, most publications only contain low-level evidence. In fact, 74% of the 50 most cited publications on the topic contain either level IV or V evidence. This study, through bibliometric analysis, demonstrates that the most often cited studies about acute distal biceps tendon repair are low level of evidence designs. This common injury and study design are ripe for larger randomized or prospective cohort studies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33792772
doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-02963-9
pii: 10.1007/s00590-021-02963-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
249-255Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Nayyar S, Quirno M, Hasan S, Rybak L, Meislin RJ (2011) Rupture of the distal biceps tendon combined with a supinator muscle tear in a 51-year-old woman: a case report. Case Rep Radiol 2011:515912. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/515912
doi: 10.1155/2011/515912
pubmed: 22606548
pmcid: 3350064
Schmidt CC, Savoie FH, Steinmann SP, Hausman M, Voloshin I, Morrey B et al (2016) Distal biceps tendon history, updates, and controversies: from the closed American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons meeting-2015. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 25(10):1717–1730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.05.025
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.05.025
pubmed: 27522340
Barret H, Winter M, Gastaud O, Saliken DJ, Gauci MO, Bronsard N (2019) Double incision repair technique with immediate mobilization for acute distal biceps tendon ruptures provides good results after 2 years in active patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 105(2):323–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2018.10.012
doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.10.012
pubmed: 30528138
Mazzocca AD, Burton KJ, Romeo AA, Santangelo S, Adams DA, Arciero RA (2007) Biomechanical evaluation of 4 techniques of distal biceps brachii tendon repair. Am J Sports Med 35(2):252–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546506294854
doi: 10.1177/0363546506294854
pubmed: 17192318
Witkowski J, Królikowska A, Czamara A, Reichert P (2017) Retrospective evaluation of surgical anatomical repair of distal biceps brachii tendon rupture using suture anchor fixation. Med Sci Monit 23:4961–4972. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.903723
Jones R, Hughes T, Lawson K, DeSilva G (2017) Citation analysis of the 100 most common articles regarding distal radius fractures. J Clin Orthop Trauma 8(1):73–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2016.09.005
Arshi A, Siesener NJ, McAllister DR, Williams RJ, Sherman SL, Jones KJ (2016) The 50 most cited articles in orthopedic cartilage surgery. Cartilage 7(3):238–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1947603515621997
doi: 10.1177/1947603515621997
pubmed: 27375839
Ahmad SS, Evangelopoulos DS, Abbasian M, Röder C, Kohl S (2014) The hundred most-cited publications in orthopaedic knee research. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(22):e190. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.00029
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00029
pubmed: 25410518
Namdari S, Baldwin K, Kovatch K, Huffman GR, Glaser D (2012) Fifty most cited articles in orthopedic shoulder surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21(12):1796–1802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.11.040
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.11.040
pubmed: 22484389
Song JW, Chung KC (2010) Observational studies: cohort and case-control studies. Plast Reconstr Surg 126(6):2234–2242. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f44abc
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f44abc
pubmed: 20697313
pmcid: 2998589
Barbera J, Selverian S, Courington R, Mikhail C, Colvin A (2020) The top 50 most influential articles in hip arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 36(3):716–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2019.09.031
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.09.031
pubmed: 31919021
Cheek J, Garnham B, Quan J (2006) What’s in a number? Issues in providing evidence of impact and quality of research(ers). Qual Health Res 16(3):423–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305285701
doi: 10.1177/1049732305285701
pubmed: 16449691
Merigó JM, Núñez A (2016) Influential journals in health research: a bibliometric study. Global Health 12(1):46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-016-0186-4