Constraints on the deformation of the vibrissa within the follicle.
Journal
PLoS computational biology
ISSN: 1553-7358
Titre abrégé: PLoS Comput Biol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101238922
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2021
04 2021
Historique:
received:
14
04
2020
accepted:
10
12
2020
entrez:
1
4
2021
pubmed:
2
4
2021
medline:
28
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Nearly all mammals have a vibrissal system specialized for tactile sensation, composed of whiskers growing from sensor-rich follicles in the skin. When a whisker deflects against an object, it deforms within the follicle and exerts forces on the mechanoreceptors inside. In addition, during active whisking behavior, muscle contractions around the follicle and increases in blood pressure in the ring sinus will affect the whisker deformation profile. To date, however, it is not yet possible to experimentally measure how the whisker deforms in an intact follicle or its effects on different groups of mechanoreceptors. The present study develops a novel model to predict vibrissal deformation within the follicle sinus complex. The model is based on experimental results from a previous ex vivo study on whisker deformation within the follicle, and on a new histological analysis of follicle tissue. It is then used to simulate whisker deformation within the follicle during passive touch and active whisking. Results suggest that the most likely whisker deformation profile is "S-shaped," crossing the midline of the follicle right below the ring sinus. Simulations of active whisking indicate that an increase in overall muscle stiffness, an increase in the ratio between deep and superficial intrinsic muscle stiffness, and an increase in sinus blood pressure will all enhance tactile sensitivity. Finally, we discuss how the deformation profiles might map to the responses of primary afferents of each mechanoreceptor type. The mechanical model presented in this study is an important first step in simulating mechanical interactions within whisker follicles.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33793548
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007887
pii: PCOMPBIOL-D-20-00608
pmc: PMC8016108
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1007887Subventions
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS093585
Pays : United States
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2006 Jan;288(1):13-25
pubmed: 16342212
Curr Biol. 2020 Mar 9;30(5):815-826.e5
pubmed: 32004452
Somatosens Mot Res. 1995;12(1):1-9
pubmed: 7571939
Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 23;9(1):6446
pubmed: 31015490
Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2015 Apr;298(4):750-60
pubmed: 25331439
Vet Res Commun. 1986 Jul;10(4):245-68
pubmed: 3526705
Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2010 Jul;293(7):1192-206
pubmed: 20583263
Nature. 2006 Oct 5;443(7111):525
pubmed: 17024083
J Neurophysiol. 2012 May;107(9):2298-312
pubmed: 22298834
J Comp Neurol. 2002 Jul 22;449(2):103-19
pubmed: 12115682
J Neurophysiol. 2006 Feb;95(2):791-802
pubmed: 16207785
Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1972;124(4):445-53
pubmed: 5010816
J Anat. 1982 Aug;135(Pt 1):147-54
pubmed: 7130049
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44272
pubmed: 23028512
Behav Brain Res. 1989 Jan 1;31(3):285-9
pubmed: 2914080
Chemosens Percept. 2008 Jun 1;1(2):110-118
pubmed: 19834574
Anat Rec. 1973 Aug;176(4):421-41
pubmed: 4723405
J Comp Neurol. 1997 Dec 29;389(4):545-68
pubmed: 9421138
Front Neuroanat. 2014 Oct 29;8:121
pubmed: 25400554
Brain Behav Evol. 2009;74(4):268-79
pubmed: 19996585
Skin Res Technol. 2015 May;21(2):149-57
pubmed: 25078795
Neuron. 2017 May 3;94(3):666-676.e9
pubmed: 28434802
PLoS Biol. 2008 Aug 26;6(8):e215
pubmed: 18752354
Brain Behav Evol. 2015;85(3):170-88
pubmed: 26022696
J Comp Neurol. 1999 Sep 6;411(4):550-62
pubmed: 10421867
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Feb;101(2):862-74
pubmed: 19036871
PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Apr;7(4):e1001120
pubmed: 21490724
J Neurosci. 2011 Jun 8;31(23):8520-32
pubmed: 21653856
Neurosci Lett. 2014 Nov 7;583:210-5
pubmed: 24911969
Am J Physiol. 1947 Dec 1;151(2):612-20
pubmed: 18901905
J Physiol. 1969 Feb;200(3):763-96
pubmed: 4974746
Nature. 2015 Oct 15;526(7573):380-4
pubmed: 26469049
Sci Adv. 2016 Aug 24;2(8):e1600716
pubmed: 27574705
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Oct;98(4):2439-55
pubmed: 17553946
Science. 2011 May 20;332(6032):955-7
pubmed: 21596988
PLoS Biol. 2007 Nov;5(11):e305
pubmed: 18001152
Neuron. 2008 Feb 28;57(4):599-613
pubmed: 18304488
Sci Rep. 2016 May 09;6:25604
pubmed: 27157809
J Physiol. 1973 Dec;235(2):287-315
pubmed: 4763992
Nat Neurosci. 2013 May;16(5):622-31
pubmed: 23563582
Brain Behav Evol. 2001;58(1):1-14
pubmed: 11799274
J Neurosci. 1990 Aug;10(8):2638-48
pubmed: 2388081
J Neurosci. 2010 Feb 3;30(5):1947-67
pubmed: 20130203
J Biomech. 2011 Nov 10;44(16):2775-81
pubmed: 21993474
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Jul;114(1):138-45
pubmed: 25855692
J Anat. 1992 Jun;180 ( Pt 3):401-17
pubmed: 1487434
J Comp Neurol. 2003 Oct 6;465(1):104-20
pubmed: 12926019
J Neurosci. 2001 Jul 15;21(14):5374-80
pubmed: 11438614
J Neurosci. 2014 Jul 23;34(30):9828-44
pubmed: 25057187
J Comp Neurol. 1986 Oct 8;252(2):186-205
pubmed: 3782507
J Comp Neurol. 1986 Oct 8;252(2):154-74
pubmed: 3782505
J Comp Neurol. 2007 Sep 20;504(3):217-37
pubmed: 17640045
Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2020 Jan;303(1):89-99
pubmed: 30332721
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006 Aug;16(4):435-44
pubmed: 16837190
Nat Neurosci. 2016 Mar;19(3):487-93
pubmed: 26780508