Novel mutations in NSP-1 and PLPro of SARS-CoV-2 NIB-1 genome mount for effective therapeutics.
COVID-19
GRL0617
ISG-15
NSP-1
Papain-like protease
SARS-CoV-2
Journal
Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology
ISSN: 2090-5920
Titre abrégé: J Genet Eng Biotechnol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101317150
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Apr 2021
02 Apr 2021
Historique:
received:
17
12
2020
accepted:
22
03
2021
entrez:
2
4
2021
pubmed:
3
4
2021
medline:
3
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the etiologic agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), is rapidly acquiring new mutations. Analysis of these mutations is necessary for gaining knowledge regarding different aspects of therapeutic development. Previously, we have reported a Sanger method-based genome sequence of a viral isolate named SARS-CoV-2 NIB-1, circulating in Bangladesh. The genome has four novel non-synonymous mutations in V121D, V843F, A889V, and G1691C positions. Using different computational tools, we have found V121D substitution has the potential to destabilize the non-structural protein-1 (NSP-1). NSP-1 inactivates the type-1 interferon-induced antiviral system. Hence, this mutant could be a basis of attenuated vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. V843F, A889V, and G1691C are all located in nonstructural protein-3 (NSP-3). G1691C can decrease the flexibility of the protein. V843F and A889V might change the binding pattern and efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 papain-like protease (PLPro) inhibitor GRL0617. V843F substitution in PLPro was the most prevalent mutation in the clinical samples. This mutation showed a reduced affinity for interferon-stimulated gene-15 protein (ISG-15) and might have an impact on innate immunity and viral spread. However, V843F+A889V double mutant exhibited the same binding affinity as wild type PLPro. A possible reason behind this phenomenon can be that V843F is a conserved residue of PLPro which damaged the protease structure, but A889V, a less conserved residue, presumably neutralized that damage. Mutants of NSP-1 could provide attenuated vaccines against coronavirus. Also, these mutations of PLPro might be targeted to develop better anti-SARS therapeutics. We hope our study will help to get better insides during the development of attenuated vaccine and PLPro inhibitors.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the etiologic agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), is rapidly acquiring new mutations. Analysis of these mutations is necessary for gaining knowledge regarding different aspects of therapeutic development. Previously, we have reported a Sanger method-based genome sequence of a viral isolate named SARS-CoV-2 NIB-1, circulating in Bangladesh. The genome has four novel non-synonymous mutations in V121D, V843F, A889V, and G1691C positions.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Using different computational tools, we have found V121D substitution has the potential to destabilize the non-structural protein-1 (NSP-1). NSP-1 inactivates the type-1 interferon-induced antiviral system. Hence, this mutant could be a basis of attenuated vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. V843F, A889V, and G1691C are all located in nonstructural protein-3 (NSP-3). G1691C can decrease the flexibility of the protein. V843F and A889V might change the binding pattern and efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 papain-like protease (PLPro) inhibitor GRL0617. V843F substitution in PLPro was the most prevalent mutation in the clinical samples. This mutation showed a reduced affinity for interferon-stimulated gene-15 protein (ISG-15) and might have an impact on innate immunity and viral spread. However, V843F+A889V double mutant exhibited the same binding affinity as wild type PLPro. A possible reason behind this phenomenon can be that V843F is a conserved residue of PLPro which damaged the protease structure, but A889V, a less conserved residue, presumably neutralized that damage.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Mutants of NSP-1 could provide attenuated vaccines against coronavirus. Also, these mutations of PLPro might be targeted to develop better anti-SARS therapeutics. We hope our study will help to get better insides during the development of attenuated vaccine and PLPro inhibitors.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33797663
doi: 10.1186/s43141-021-00152-z
pii: 10.1186/s43141-021-00152-z
pmc: PMC8017899
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
52Références
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jul;41(Web Server issue):W384-8
pubmed: 23737448
Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;26(7):1470-1477
pubmed: 32255761
Antiviral Res. 2020 Jul;179:104811
pubmed: 32360182
ACS Infect Dis. 2020 Aug 14;6(8):2099-2109
pubmed: 32428392
J Mol Evol. 1982;18(5):360-9
pubmed: 7120431
Gene Rep. 2020 Jun;19:100682
pubmed: 32300673
J Comput Chem. 2010 Jan 30;31(2):455-61
pubmed: 19499576
Lancet. 2020 Jun 6;395(10239):1771-1778
pubmed: 32410760
PLoS Pathog. 2011 Dec;7(12):e1002433
pubmed: 22174690
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jul 2;46(W1):W296-W303
pubmed: 29788355
Microbiol Resour Announc. 2020 Jul 9;9(28):
pubmed: 32646908
J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2021 Mar;39(5):1688-1697
pubmed: 32116130
J Comput Biol. 2000 Feb-Apr;7(1-2):203-14
pubmed: 10890397
Nature. 2020 Mar;579(7798):265-269
pubmed: 32015508
J Comput Chem. 2004 Oct;25(13):1605-12
pubmed: 15264254
Bull World Health Organ. 2020 Jul 01;98(7):495-504
pubmed: 32742035
J Virol. 2020 Nov 9;94(23):
pubmed: 32938761
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2010 Jan;66(Pt 1):12-21
pubmed: 20057044
Nat Med. 2020 Apr;26(4):450-452
pubmed: 32284615
Antiviral Res. 2015 Mar;115:21-38
pubmed: 25554382
Bioinformatics. 2015 Aug 15;31(16):2745-7
pubmed: 25851949
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2004 Aug;60(Pt 8):1355-63
pubmed: 15272157
Proteins. 2003 Feb 15;50(3):437-50
pubmed: 12557186
J Comput Chem. 2019 Oct 15;40(27):2413-2417
pubmed: 31173387
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jul 8;44(W1):W406-9
pubmed: 27131371
Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Jan 1;28(1):235-42
pubmed: 10592235
J Vet Res. 2018 Dec 10;62(3):249-255
pubmed: 30584600
Protein J. 2020 Jun;39(3):198-216
pubmed: 32447571
Virus Res. 2015 Apr 16;202:89-100
pubmed: 25432065
Virus Res. 2015 Aug 3;206:120-33
pubmed: 25736566
Nature. 1992 Mar 5;356(6364):83-5
pubmed: 1538787
Nature. 2020 Nov;587(7835):657-662
pubmed: 32726803
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;7(10):875-882
pubmed: 32593341
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Aug 22;103(34):12885-90
pubmed: 16912115
BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 Nov 08;11:548
pubmed: 21059217
Mol Biol (Mosk). 2008 Jul-Aug;42(4):701-6
pubmed: 18856071
J Mol Biol. 1996 Nov 22;264(1):121-36
pubmed: 8950272
Euro Surveill. 2017 Mar 30;22(13):
pubmed: 28382917
Gene. 2021 Mar 1;771:145368
pubmed: 33346100
PLoS Pathog. 2007 Aug 10;3(8):e109
pubmed: 17696607
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020 May - Jun;14(3):247-250
pubmed: 32247212
J Virol. 2007 Nov;81(21):11620-33
pubmed: 17715225
J Mol Biol. 2013 Dec 13;425(24):4995-5008
pubmed: 24095857
Proteins. 2006 Mar 1;62(4):1125-32
pubmed: 16372356
Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998 Oct;11(4):614-27
pubmed: 9767059
Bioinformatics. 2016 Dec 1;32(23):3676-3678
pubmed: 27503228
Protein Sci. 1993 Sep;2(9):1511-9
pubmed: 8401235
Methods Mol Biol. 2015;1282:1-23
pubmed: 25720466
Mol Biol Evol. 2017 Dec 1;34(12):3205-3215
pubmed: 29029187