Efficacy of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern 202012/01 (B.1.1.7): an exploratory analysis of a randomised controlled trial.
Adolescent
Adult
Antibodies, Neutralizing
/ blood
COVID-19
/ epidemiology
COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing
COVID-19 Vaccines
/ adverse effects
ChAdOx1 nCoV-19
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques
Pandemics
/ prevention & control
SARS-CoV-2
/ immunology
Single-Blind Method
United Kingdom
/ epidemiology
Viral Load
Young Adult
Journal
Lancet (London, England)
ISSN: 1474-547X
Titre abrégé: Lancet
Pays: England
ID NLM: 2985213R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 04 2021
10 04 2021
Historique:
received:
03
02
2021
revised:
04
03
2021
accepted:
10
03
2021
pubmed:
3
4
2021
medline:
24
4
2021
entrez:
2
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A new variant of SARS-CoV-2, B.1.1.7, emerged as the dominant cause of COVID-19 disease in the UK from November, 2020. We report a post-hoc analysis of the efficacy of the adenoviral vector vaccine, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222), against this variant. Volunteers (aged ≥18 years) who were enrolled in phase 2/3 vaccine efficacy studies in the UK, and who were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or a meningococcal conjugate control (MenACWY) vaccine, provided upper airway swabs on a weekly basis and also if they developed symptoms of COVID-19 disease (a cough, a fever of 37·8°C or higher, shortness of breath, anosmia, or ageusia). Swabs were tested by nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) for SARS-CoV-2 and positive samples were sequenced through the COVID-19 Genomics UK consortium. Neutralising antibody responses were measured using a live-virus microneutralisation assay against the B.1.1.7 lineage and a canonical non-B.1.1.7 lineage (Victoria). The efficacy analysis included symptomatic COVID-19 in seronegative participants with a NAAT positive swab more than 14 days after a second dose of vaccine. Participants were analysed according to vaccine received. Vaccine efficacy was calculated as 1 - relative risk (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vs MenACWY groups) derived from a robust Poisson regression model. This study is continuing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04400838, and ISRCTN, 15281137. Participants in efficacy cohorts were recruited between May 31 and Nov 13, 2020, and received booster doses between Aug 3 and Dec 30, 2020. Of 8534 participants in the primary efficacy cohort, 6636 (78%) were aged 18-55 years and 5065 (59%) were female. Between Oct 1, 2020, and Jan 14, 2021, 520 participants developed SARS-CoV-2 infection. 1466 NAAT positive nose and throat swabs were collected from these participants during the trial. Of these, 401 swabs from 311 participants were successfully sequenced. Laboratory virus neutralisation activity by vaccine-induced antibodies was lower against the B.1.1.7 variant than against the Victoria lineage (geometric mean ratio 8·9, 95% CI 7·2-11·0). Clinical vaccine efficacy against symptomatic NAAT positive infection was 70·4% (95% CI 43·6-84·5) for B.1.1.7 and 81·5% (67·9-89·4) for non-B.1.1.7 lineages. ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 showed reduced neutralisation activity against the B.1.1.7 variant compared with a non-B.1.1.7 variant in vitro, but the vaccine showed efficacy against the B.1.1.7 variant of SARS-CoV-2. UK Research and Innovation, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Thames Valley and South Midlands NIHR Clinical Research Network, and AstraZeneca.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
A new variant of SARS-CoV-2, B.1.1.7, emerged as the dominant cause of COVID-19 disease in the UK from November, 2020. We report a post-hoc analysis of the efficacy of the adenoviral vector vaccine, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222), against this variant.
METHODS
Volunteers (aged ≥18 years) who were enrolled in phase 2/3 vaccine efficacy studies in the UK, and who were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or a meningococcal conjugate control (MenACWY) vaccine, provided upper airway swabs on a weekly basis and also if they developed symptoms of COVID-19 disease (a cough, a fever of 37·8°C or higher, shortness of breath, anosmia, or ageusia). Swabs were tested by nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) for SARS-CoV-2 and positive samples were sequenced through the COVID-19 Genomics UK consortium. Neutralising antibody responses were measured using a live-virus microneutralisation assay against the B.1.1.7 lineage and a canonical non-B.1.1.7 lineage (Victoria). The efficacy analysis included symptomatic COVID-19 in seronegative participants with a NAAT positive swab more than 14 days after a second dose of vaccine. Participants were analysed according to vaccine received. Vaccine efficacy was calculated as 1 - relative risk (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vs MenACWY groups) derived from a robust Poisson regression model. This study is continuing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04400838, and ISRCTN, 15281137.
FINDINGS
Participants in efficacy cohorts were recruited between May 31 and Nov 13, 2020, and received booster doses between Aug 3 and Dec 30, 2020. Of 8534 participants in the primary efficacy cohort, 6636 (78%) were aged 18-55 years and 5065 (59%) were female. Between Oct 1, 2020, and Jan 14, 2021, 520 participants developed SARS-CoV-2 infection. 1466 NAAT positive nose and throat swabs were collected from these participants during the trial. Of these, 401 swabs from 311 participants were successfully sequenced. Laboratory virus neutralisation activity by vaccine-induced antibodies was lower against the B.1.1.7 variant than against the Victoria lineage (geometric mean ratio 8·9, 95% CI 7·2-11·0). Clinical vaccine efficacy against symptomatic NAAT positive infection was 70·4% (95% CI 43·6-84·5) for B.1.1.7 and 81·5% (67·9-89·4) for non-B.1.1.7 lineages.
INTERPRETATION
ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 showed reduced neutralisation activity against the B.1.1.7 variant compared with a non-B.1.1.7 variant in vitro, but the vaccine showed efficacy against the B.1.1.7 variant of SARS-CoV-2.
FUNDING
UK Research and Innovation, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Thames Valley and South Midlands NIHR Clinical Research Network, and AstraZeneca.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33798499
pii: S0140-6736(21)00628-0
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00628-0
pmc: PMC8009612
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Neutralizing
0
COVID-19 Vaccines
0
ChAdOx1 nCoV-19
B5S3K2V0G8
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04400838']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1351-1362Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_00004/04
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_19026
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_12023/22
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_19027
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 211153/Z/18/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests Oxford University has entered into a partnership with AstraZeneca for further development of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. AstraZeneca reviewed the data from the study and the final manuscript before submission but the authors retained editorial control. SCG is cofounder of Vaccitech (collaborators in the early development of this vaccine candidate) and is named as an inventor on a patent covering use of ChAdOx1-vectored vaccines (PCT/GB2012/000467) and a patent application covering this SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. TL is named as an inventor on a patent application covering this SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and was a consultant to Vaccitech. PMF is a consultant to Vaccitech. AJP is chair of the UK Department of Health and Social Care Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation but does not participate in policy advice on coronavirus vaccines, and is a member of the WHO Strategic Advisory Group of Experts. AJP and SNF are NIHR senior investigators. AVSH is a cofounder of and consultant to Vaccitech and is named as an inventor on a patent covering design and use of ChAdOx1-vectored vaccines (PCT/GB2012/000467). MDS reports grants from Janssen, GlaxoSmithKline, Medimmune, Novavax, and MCM Vaccine, and grants and non-financial support from Pfizer outside of the submitted work. CMG reports personal fees from the Duke Human Vaccine Institute outside of the submitted work. ADD reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca outside of the submitted work. SNF reports grants from Janssen and Valneva outside of the submitted work. TLV and JV are employees of AstraZeneca. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Références
Nat Med. 2021 Feb;27(2):270-278
pubmed: 33335323
Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7830):578-582
pubmed: 32731258
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 17;71(10):2663-2666
pubmed: 32442256
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 4;384(5):403-416
pubmed: 33378609
J Infect Dis. 2021 May 28;223(10):1666-1670
pubmed: 33580259
Euro Surveill. 2021 Jan;26(1):
pubmed: 33413740
Mol Biol Evol. 2015 Jan;32(1):268-74
pubmed: 25371430
Lancet. 2021 Dec 19;396(10267):1979-1993
pubmed: 33220855
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Apr;27(4):511-519
pubmed: 33484843
Nat Immunol. 2020 Nov;21(11):1336-1345
pubmed: 32887977
J Infect. 2020 Dec;81(6):847-856
pubmed: 33049331
Euro Surveill. 2020 Aug;25(32):
pubmed: 32794447
Lancet. 2021 Jan 9;397(10269):99-111
pubmed: 33306989
Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 11;12(1):267
pubmed: 33431879
Lancet. 2020 Aug 15;396(10249):467-478
pubmed: 32702298
Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 Jul 15;30(14):3059-66
pubmed: 12136088
Nat Med. 2021 Apr;27(4):622-625
pubmed: 33654292
Euro Surveill. 2021 Jan;26(3):
pubmed: 33478625
Science. 2021 Mar 12;371(6534):1152-1153
pubmed: 33514629
Cell Host Microbe. 2021 Apr 14;29(4):529-539.e3
pubmed: 33705729
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 16;73(10):1946-1947
pubmed: 33421056
Nat Med. 2021 Apr;27(4):620-621
pubmed: 33558724
Nat Med. 2021 Feb;27(2):279-288
pubmed: 33335322
Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7819):115-119
pubmed: 32454513
Lancet. 2021 Feb 20;397(10275):671-681
pubmed: 33545094
Cell. 2021 Apr 15;184(8):2201-2211.e7
pubmed: 33743891
Cell. 2020 Sep 3;182(5):1295-1310.e20
pubmed: 32841599
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 17;383(25):2427-2438
pubmed: 32991794
Cell Mol Immunol. 2021 Apr;18(4):1061-1063
pubmed: 33633321
Virus Evol. 2018 May 18;4(1):vey007
pubmed: 29876136
Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7830):583-588
pubmed: 32731257
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Sep 22;58(10):
pubmed: 32669382
Lancet. 2021 Mar 6;397(10277):881-891
pubmed: 33617777
N Engl J Med. 2021 May 20;384(20):1885-1898
pubmed: 33725432
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 31;383(27):2603-2615
pubmed: 33301246