Assessing the Effectiveness of Front of Pack Labels: Findings from an Online Randomised-Controlled Experiment in a Representative British Sample.
comprehension
front of pack label
nutrition policy
nutritional labelling
randomised controlled experiment
Journal
Nutrients
ISSN: 2072-6643
Titre abrégé: Nutrients
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101521595
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Mar 2021
10 Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
12
02
2021
revised:
05
03
2021
accepted:
08
03
2021
entrez:
3
4
2021
pubmed:
4
4
2021
medline:
14
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Front of pack food labels (FOPLs) provide accessible nutritional information to guide consumer choice. Using an online experiment with a large representative British sample, we aimed to examine whether FOPLs improve participants' ability to identify the healthiness of foods and drinks. The primary aim was to compare ability to rank between FOPL groups and a no label control. Adults (≥18 years), recruited from the NatCen panel, were randomised to one of five experimental groups (Multiple Traffic Light, MTL; Nutri-Score, N-S; Warning Label, WL; Positive Choice tick, PC; no label control). Stratification variables were year of recruitment to panel, sex, age, government office region, and household income. Packaging images were created for three versions, varying in healthiness, of six food and drink products (pizza, drinks, cakes, crisps, yoghurts, breakfast cereals). Participants were asked to rank the three product images in order of healthiness. Ranking was completed on a single occasion and comprised a baseline measure (with no FOPL), and a follow-up measure including the FOPL as per each participant's experimental group. The primary outcome was the ability to accurately rank product healthiness (all products ranked correctly vs. any incorrect). In 2020, 4504 participants had complete data and were included in the analysis. The probability of correct ranking at follow-up, and improving between baseline and follow-up, was significantly greater across all products for the N-S, MTL and WL groups, compared to control. This was seen for only some of the products for the PC group. The largest effects were seen for N-S, followed by MTL. These analyses were adjusted for stratification variables, ethnicity, education, household composition, food shopping responsibility, and current FOPL use. Exploratory analyses showed a tendency for participants with higher compared to lower education to rank products more accurately. Conclusions: All FOPLs were effective at improving participants' ability to correctly rank products according to healthiness in this large representative British sample, with the largest effects seen for N-S, followed by MTL.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33802115
pii: nu13030900
doi: 10.3390/nu13030900
pmc: PMC7999818
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/R020817/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : National Institute for Health Research
ID : PR-PRU-0916-21001
Références
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Dec 14;4(6):e001882
pubmed: 31908864
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Jan;24(1):62-74
pubmed: 33019950
Public Health Nutr. 2005 Feb;8(1):21-8
pubmed: 15705241
Obes Rev. 2016 Mar;17(3):201-10
pubmed: 26693944
Nutrients. 2018 Oct 18;10(10):
pubmed: 30340388
Lancet Public Health. 2019 Jan;4(1):e15
pubmed: 30621934
Nutrients. 2019 Mar 14;11(3):
pubmed: 30875797
Nutr Rev. 2017 Apr 1;75(4):260-273
pubmed: 28371913
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2020 Aug;33(4):518-537
pubmed: 32364292
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 27;2:CD009315
pubmed: 29482264
Appetite. 2010 Oct;55(2):177-89
pubmed: 20546813
Lancet. 2017 Dec 16;390(10113):2627-2642
pubmed: 29029897
Nutr Rev. 2013 Jan;71(1):1-14
pubmed: 23282247
Food Policy. 2015 Oct 1;56:76-86
pubmed: 26417151
Psychol Health. 2013;28(2):202-16
pubmed: 22924452
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Nov 19;17(1):146
pubmed: 33213459
Appetite. 2020 Jan 1;144:104485
pubmed: 31605724
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2015;55(3):291-303
pubmed: 24915389