Air Pollution's Impact on the Economic, Social, Medical, and Industrial Injury Environments in China.
air pollution
environmental efficiency
medical treatment
meta-DDF
work injury
Journal
Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2227-9032
Titre abrégé: Healthcare (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101666525
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Mar 2021
01 Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
05
01
2021
revised:
13
02
2021
accepted:
18
02
2021
entrez:
3
4
2021
pubmed:
4
4
2021
medline:
4
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In this era of rapid economic development, it is inevitable that economic activities eventually cause serious damage to the environment's air quality, making it the focus of global public health. If the treatment efficiency of medical accidents can be improved, then this can significantly stabilize society and improve production efficiency. Past research has mainly focused on work safety and health issues, seldom discussing economic, social, medical, and environmental pollution issues together, and, most generally, adopted static methods that fail to recognize how air pollution affects the overall economy, society, medical care, and external environment. In order to more deeply understand the changes among social, economic activities, and environmental issues due to air pollution, this study proposes a meta-two-stage undesirable dynamic DDF (Direction Distance Function) that, under an exogenous model, divides the 30 provinces of China into high-income regions and middle-income regions and explores the economic, social, medical, and environmental efficiencies between the two areas to resolve the lack of related static analyses. The empirical results are as follows. (1) The AQI (air quality index) significantly impacts the efficiency of medical injuries in various regions. (2) When the AQI is considered, the medical insurance expenditure efficiency score value of high-income areas is lower than the value without the AQI. (3) When the AQI is considered, the efficiency value of the number of work injury insurance benefits in the middle-income area is lower than the efficiency value without the AQI.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33804567
pii: healthcare9030261
doi: 10.3390/healthcare9030261
pmc: PMC7999317
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : National Social Science Foundation of China
ID : (No. 18BJL127).
Références
Lancet. 2017 Sep 16;390(10100):1345-1422
pubmed: 28919119
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2005 Jul 9-23;68(13-14):1301-7
pubmed: 16024504
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2020 Sep 7;18:32
pubmed: 32944004
Environ Health Perspect. 2015 Feb;123(2):135-43
pubmed: 25343779
Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2224-60
pubmed: 23245609
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 12;15(11):e0242282
pubmed: 33180874
Eval Program Plann. 2010 Nov;33(4):457-67
pubmed: 19939448
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 11;15(2):e0226046
pubmed: 32045414
J Health Econ. 2012 Jan;31(1):180-96
pubmed: 22030091
Am Econ Rev. 2012 Dec;102(7):3652-3673
pubmed: 26401055
J Health Econ. 2009 May;28(3):688-703
pubmed: 19328569
Inquiry. 2020 Jan-Dec;57:46958020972211
pubmed: 33238775
Public Health. 2011 Mar;125(3):157-64
pubmed: 21334032
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Dec;30(12):2391-9
pubmed: 22147868
Inquiry. 2020 Jan-Dec;57:46958020975220
pubmed: 33238776