Psychometric Properties and Factor Structure of the Spanish Version of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II) in Ecuador.
acceptance and action questionnaire
acceptance and commitment therapy
psychological inflexibility
psychometric properties
university students
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 03 2021
13 03 2021
Historique:
received:
16
01
2021
revised:
03
03
2021
accepted:
09
03
2021
entrez:
3
4
2021
pubmed:
4
4
2021
medline:
27
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
(1) Background: The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II) is the most well-known self-report measure to assess psychological inflexibility, a transdiagnostic pathological process, and targets for interventions. Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the psychometric properties and factorial structure of the Ecuadorian Spanish version of the AAQ-II in a large sample of college students in Ecuador. (2) Methods: A total of 7905 students, 46.26% male and 53.75% female, from 11 Ecuadorian universities were surveyed. The AAQ-II was tested for factorial structure, reliability, and correlations with other health-related measures. (3) Results: The AAQ-II showed an unidimensional factorial structure, accounting for 66.87% to 70% of the total variance and showing a good fit of the data to the model (comparative adjustment index (CFI) = 0.995; goodness of fit index (GFI) = 0.992; Standardized Root Mean Squared Residual (SRMR) = 0.037; mean square approximation error (RMSEA) = 0.047, CI90% = 0.038-0.056). Reliability was optimal (Cronbach's α = 0.919; ω = 0.928), and AAQ-II scores significantly correlated with multiple health indicators. Psychological inflexibility was significantly higher in women than men. (4) Conclusions: The Spanish version of the AAQ-II showed good psychometric properties, which further supports psychological inflexibility, not just as a transdiagnostic process.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33805642
pii: ijerph18062944
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18062944
pmc: PMC8001464
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 28;11(12):e0168536
pubmed: 28030586
Educ Psychol Meas. 2018 Oct;78(5):762-780
pubmed: 32655169
Springerplus. 2016 Jun 14;5(1):712
pubmed: 27375981
J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96
pubmed: 6668417
Physiol Behav. 2020 Oct 1;224:113045
pubmed: 32619529
Int J Behav Med. 2008;15(3):194-200
pubmed: 18696313
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 26;14(2):e0212788
pubmed: 30807594
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Jul 19;14:205
pubmed: 25037706
Psychol Assess. 2016 May;28(5):e101-e110
pubmed: 26502199
Psicothema. 2013 Feb;25(1):123-9
pubmed: 23336554
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2018 Jan-Apr;18(1):60-68
pubmed: 30487911
Psychol Assess. 2011 Dec;23(4):970-82
pubmed: 21767025
J Contextual Behav Sci. 2020 Oct;18:162-174
pubmed: 32953435
J Occup Health Psychol. 2000 Jan;5(1):156-63
pubmed: 10658893
Behav Ther. 2011 Dec;42(4):676-88
pubmed: 22035996
Res Aging. 2004;26(6):655-672
pubmed: 18504506
Behav Ther. 2016 Nov;47(6):869-885
pubmed: 27993338
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996 Dec;64(6):1152-68
pubmed: 8991302
Span J Psychol. 2006 May;9(1):86-93
pubmed: 16673626
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Sep 15;14(9):
pubmed: 28914801
J Affect Disord. 2010 Apr;122(1-2):86-95
pubmed: 19616305
J Behav Med. 2006 Jun;29(3):291-8
pubmed: 16565785