Stereolithography vs. Direct Light Processing for Rapid Manufacturing of Complete Denture Bases: An In Vitro Accuracy Analysis.
3D printing
additive manufacturing
complete denture
direct light processing
edentulism
rapid manufacturing
rapid prototyping
stereolithography
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Mar 2021
04 Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
09
02
2021
revised:
22
02
2021
accepted:
25
02
2021
entrez:
3
4
2021
pubmed:
4
4
2021
medline:
4
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The topical literature lacks any comparison between stereolithography (SLA) and direct light processing (DLP) printing methods with regard to the accuracy of complete denture base fabrication, thereby utilizing materials certified for this purpose. In order to investigate this aspect, 15 denture bases were printed with SLA and DLP methods using three build angles: 0°, 45° and 90°. The dentures were digitalized using a laboratory scanner (D2000, 3Shape) and analyzed in analyzing software (Geomagic Control X, 3D systems). Differences between 3D datasets were measured using the root mean square (RMS) value for trueness and precision and mean and maximum deviations were obtained for each denture base. The data were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparison test. A heat map was generated to display the locations of the deviations within the intaglio surface. The overall tendency indicated that SLA denture bases had significantly higher trueness for most build angles compared to DLP (
Identifiants
pubmed: 33806627
pii: jcm10051070
doi: 10.3390/jcm10051070
pmc: PMC7961584
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
J Clin Med. 2020 Jan 23;9(2):
pubmed: 31979345
Int J Comput Dent. 2019;22(3):231-237
pubmed: 31463487
Dent Mater. 2018 Dec;34(12):e324-e333
pubmed: 30293688
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Dec;124(6):682-689
pubmed: 31926657
Dent Mater. 2016 Jan;32(1):54-64
pubmed: 26494268
BMC Oral Health. 2019 Mar 13;19(1):46
pubmed: 30866892
Materials (Basel). 2020 Aug 02;13(15):
pubmed: 32748815
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Jan;117(1):28-33
pubmed: 27492983
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Jan;125(1):139-145
pubmed: 32089361
J Prosthodont. 2020 Feb;29(2):161-165
pubmed: 31886914
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Sep;120(3):331-334
pubmed: 29724559
J Prosthodont. 2015 Oct;24(7):576-579
pubmed: 26032438
Dent Mater. 2021 Feb 18;:
pubmed: 33610310
Materials (Basel). 2019 Oct 25;12(21):
pubmed: 31731447
J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2018 Jul;16(3):151-160
pubmed: 29609487
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Mar;125(3):479-485
pubmed: 32276824
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Nov 22;:
pubmed: 33239193
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020 Nov;111:103975
pubmed: 32781402
Dent Mater J. 2012 Feb 3;31(1):40-6
pubmed: 22277604
Int J Prosthodont. 2020 Nov/Dec;33(6):634-640
pubmed: 33284905
J Prosthodont Res. 2019 Jul;63(3):313-320
pubmed: 30792148
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Dec;120(6):919-926
pubmed: 29961610
Int J Comput Dent. 2018;21(1):41-56
pubmed: 29610780
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Mar;123(3):473-482
pubmed: 31227240
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Oct 31;:
pubmed: 33143902
J Am Dent Assoc. 2014 Nov;145(11):1133-40
pubmed: 25359645
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Jan;121(1):110-117
pubmed: 30006217