Effects of the Anti-Tumorigenic Agent AT101 on Human Glioblastoma Cells in the Microenvironmental Glioma Stem Cell Niche.
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ pharmacology
Brain
/ pathology
Brain Neoplasms
/ metabolism
Carcinogenesis
Cell Line, Tumor
Cell Proliferation
/ drug effects
Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
/ drug effects
Glioblastoma
/ drug therapy
Glioma
/ drug therapy
Gossypol
/ analogs & derivatives
Humans
Neoplastic Stem Cells
/ metabolism
Signal Transduction
/ drug effects
Stem Cell Niche
/ drug effects
Temozolomide
/ pharmacology
Tumor Microenvironment
/ drug effects
CXCR7
IL-6R
R-(-)-gossypol
chemoresistance
glioblastoma
heterogeneity
microenvironment
temozolomide
tumor stem-like cells
Journal
International journal of molecular sciences
ISSN: 1422-0067
Titre abrégé: Int J Mol Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101092791
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Mar 2021
30 Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
19
02
2021
revised:
23
03
2021
accepted:
27
03
2021
entrez:
3
4
2021
pubmed:
4
4
2021
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Glioblastoma (GBM) is a barely treatable disease due to its profound chemoresistance. A distinct inter- and intratumoral heterogeneity reflected by specialized microenvironmental niches and different tumor cell subpopulations allows GBMs to evade therapy regimens. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop alternative treatment strategies. A promising candidate for the treatment of GBMs is AT101, the R(-) enantiomer of gossypol. The present study evaluates the effects of AT101, alone or in combination with temozolomide (TMZ), in a microenvironmental glioma stem cell niche model of two GBM cell lines (U251MG and U87MG). AT101 was found to induce strong cytotoxic effects on U251MG and U87MG stem-like cells in comparison to the respective native cells. Moreover, a higher sensitivity against treatment with AT101 was observed upon incubation of native cells with a stem-like cell-conditioned medium. This higher sensitivity was reflected by a specific inhibitory influence on the p-p42/44 signaling pathway. Further, the expression of CXCR7 and the interleukin-6 receptor was significantly regulated upon these stimulatory conditions. Since tumor stem-like cells are known to mediate the development of tumor recurrences and were observed to strongly respond to the AT101 treatment, this might represent a promising approach to prevent the development of GBM recurrences.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33808494
pii: ijms22073606
doi: 10.3390/ijms22073606
pmc: PMC8037174
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Gossypol
KAV15B369O
gossypol acetic acid
S7RL72610R
Temozolomide
YF1K15M17Y
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : RTG2154
Organisme : University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, UKSH
ID : Anschub 2020
Références
Int J Oncol. 2014 Dec;45(6):2278-86
pubmed: 25231749
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2015 Sep;76(3):461-9
pubmed: 26113054
Future Med Chem. 2017 Jul;9(11):1243-1275
pubmed: 28722469
Biomolecules. 2019 Oct 10;9(10):
pubmed: 31658771
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:9634172
pubmed: 28630875
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016 Apr;1863(4):499-509
pubmed: 26721623
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2020 Aug 05;4(4):443-459
pubmed: 32793872
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug;144(8):1475-1485
pubmed: 29858681
Neurochem Int. 2012 Dec;61(7):1183-91
pubmed: 22948185
Neurosurg Focus. 2014 Dec;37(6):E11
pubmed: 25434380
Int J Biol Sci. 2012;8(9):1237-47
pubmed: 23136552
Radiat Oncol. 2015 Jul 30;10:158
pubmed: 26223311
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Aug 06;21(16):
pubmed: 32781585
Neuro Oncol. 2021 Feb 25;23(2):199-213
pubmed: 33173943
Elife. 2016 Jan 21;5:e10820
pubmed: 26796342
J Neurooncol. 1999 May;43(1):79-86
pubmed: 10448875
Autophagy. 2018;14(10):1693-1709
pubmed: 29938581
Oncotarget. 2017 Nov 18;8(64):108064-108078
pubmed: 29296224
Cancer Res. 2011 Jun 15;71(12):4055-60
pubmed: 21628493
Mol Pharmacol. 1990 Jun;37(6):840-7
pubmed: 2193225
Cell Cycle. 2009 Oct 15;8(20):3274-84
pubmed: 19770585
Mol Cancer Res. 2010 Jul;8(7):1002-16
pubmed: 20587533
J Biol Chem. 1984 Aug 10;259(15):9607-15
pubmed: 6746663
Oncol Rep. 2012 May;27(5):1348-52
pubmed: 22323084
Cancer Cell. 2010 Jan 19;17(1):98-110
pubmed: 20129251
Stem Cells Int. 2016;2016:6809105
pubmed: 26880981
Curr Opin Immunol. 2013 Apr;25(2):261-7
pubmed: 23579076
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2019 Dec;2(6):e1185
pubmed: 32729189
Trends Neurosci. 2021 Mar;44(3):215-226
pubmed: 33234347
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Mar 12;11(3):
pubmed: 30871073
Trends Mol Med. 2008 Mar;14(3):109-19
pubmed: 18261959
Cancer Cell Int. 2014 Dec 16;14(1):141
pubmed: 25530717
Int J Nanomedicine. 2020 Oct 05;15:7415-7431
pubmed: 33116479
Gen Physiol Biophys. 2014;33(4):433-42
pubmed: 24968413
Cytokine. 2015 Feb;71(2):377-84
pubmed: 25458967
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Oct 29;110(44):17933-8
pubmed: 24114272
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Mar 5;110(10):4009-14
pubmed: 23412337
Cell Commun Signal. 2016 Oct 27;14(1):26
pubmed: 27784296
Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2017;331:181-244
pubmed: 28325212
Br J Cancer. 2014 Dec 9;111(12):2275-86
pubmed: 25375271
Adv Cancer Res. 2016;132:265-367
pubmed: 27613135
Nat Commun. 2014 Mar 25;5:3472
pubmed: 24668028
Int J Biochem. 1993 Aug;25(8):1149-55
pubmed: 8405656
Biochem Pharmacol. 2017 Jul 15;136:12-23
pubmed: 28288819
Nat Rev Immunol. 2017 Sep;17(9):559-572
pubmed: 28555670
Mech Ageing Dev. 2018 Mar;170:45-58
pubmed: 28684269
Cancer Res. 2010 Apr 15;70(8):3299-308
pubmed: 20388803
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020 Oct;21(10):607-632
pubmed: 32576977
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan;146(1):117-126
pubmed: 31844979
Anticancer Res. 2015 Jan;35(1):53-64
pubmed: 25550535
Semin Immunol. 2014 Feb;26(1):38-47
pubmed: 24602448
Histochem Cell Biol. 2018 Mar;149(3):219-233
pubmed: 29356965
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):987-96
pubmed: 15758009
Cancer Res. 1989 Jul 15;49(14):3754-8
pubmed: 2736516
Science. 2014 Jan 10;343(6167):189-193
pubmed: 24336570