Effects of Audiovisual Memory Cues on Working Memory Recall.

memory cues multisensory integration

Journal

Vision (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2411-5150
Titre abrégé: Vision (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101733282

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Mar 2021
Historique:
received: 04 02 2021
revised: 10 03 2021
accepted: 18 03 2021
entrez: 3 4 2021
pubmed: 4 4 2021
medline: 4 4 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Previous studies have focused on topics such as multimodal integration and object discrimination, but there is limited research on the effect of multimodal learning in memory. Perceptual studies have shown facilitative effects of multimodal stimuli for learning; the current study aims to determine whether this effect persists with memory cues. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect that audiovisual memory cues have on memory recall, as well as whether the use of multiple memory cues leads to higher recall. The goal was to orthogonally evaluate the effect of the number of self-generated memory cues (one or three), and the modality of the self-generated memory-cue (visual: written words, auditory: spoken words, or audiovisual). A recall task was administered where participants were presented with their self-generated memory cues and asked to determine the target word. There was a significant main effect for number of cues, but no main effect for modality. A secondary goal of this study was to determine which types of memory cues result in the highest recall. Self-reference cues resulted in the highest accuracy score. This study has applications to improving academic performance by using the most efficient learning techniques.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33808715
pii: vision5010014
doi: 10.3390/vision5010014
pmc: PMC8005969
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60
pubmed: 19897823
PLoS One. 2008 Jan 30;3(1):e1532
pubmed: 18231612
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003 Oct;4(10):829-39
pubmed: 14523382
Exp Brain Res. 2016 May;234(5):1199-207
pubmed: 26048162
Psychol Rep. 2014 Apr;114(2):541-56
pubmed: 24897906
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91
pubmed: 17695343
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Jul;24(2):326-34
pubmed: 15993770
Exp Psychol. 2015;62(2):123-30
pubmed: 25384643
Curr Biol. 2006 Jul 25;16(14):1422-7
pubmed: 16860741
Mem Cognit. 1996 Mar;24(2):217-25
pubmed: 8881324
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1977 Sep;35(9):677-88
pubmed: 909043
Psychol Bull. 1980 Nov;88(3):638-67
pubmed: 7003641
Can J Exp Psychol. 1994 Sep;48(3):380-98
pubmed: 7951198
Cognition. 2010 Mar;114(3):389-404
pubmed: 19909945

Auteurs

Hilary C Pearson (HC)

Department of Clinical Vision Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.

Jonathan M P Wilbiks (JMP)

Department of Psychology, University of New Brunswick, Saint John, NB E2L 4L5, Canada.

Classifications MeSH