Advance Approval of Outpatient Chemotherapy via Phone Call Optimizes Healthcare Delivery without Compromising Patient Satisfaction with Care.
advance approval
chemotherapy
healthcare organization
phone call
satisfaction
Journal
Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Mar 2021
16 Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
15
01
2021
revised:
12
03
2021
accepted:
12
03
2021
entrez:
3
4
2021
pubmed:
4
4
2021
medline:
4
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Patient satisfaction is linked to the amount of time spent with the physician. At the same time, long waiting times in hospitals are a major source of patient dissatisfaction. The aim of this study was to determine whether advance approval of outpatient chemotherapy (CT) via phone call can optimize healthcare delivery without compromising patient satisfaction with care. Between 2013 and 2016, 343 patients with breast/gynecological cancer scheduled to undergo CT on day 8 and/or day 15 of the CT cycle were enrolled in a before-after study conducted in a French comprehensive cancer center. In the control group, 168 patients received a face-to-face consultation with an oncologist on the day of CT for approval of the upcoming CT session. In the intervention group, 175 patients received a phone call from a healthcare provider the day before CT, where assessment of toxicity from the previous CT session was recorded and submitted to an oncologist for approval of the upcoming CT session. At the end of the 6th CT cycle, patient satisfaction was evaluated using EORTC IN-PATSAT32. A total of 233 questionnaires were analyzed (response rate: 77.7%). Satisfaction with care was similar between the two groups. No differences in perceived health status were observed, but self-reported time in hospital was lower in the intervention group than in the control group (
Identifiants
pubmed: 33809577
pii: cancers13061337
doi: 10.3390/cancers13061337
pmc: PMC8000867
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Int J Qual Health Care. 2013 Dec;25(6):696-703
pubmed: 24123242
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 May;28(3):e13015
pubmed: 30790365
Med Decis Making. 2010 Mar-Apr;30(2):234-45
pubmed: 19675320
Arch Intern Med. 2001 Jun 11;161(11):1437-42
pubmed: 11386893
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Aug 16;6:102
pubmed: 16914046
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Jul;28(7):3153-3163
pubmed: 31701269
J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2005 Jan-Feb;22(1):31-7
pubmed: 15574724
J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Feb;14(1):148-54
pubmed: 18211659
Eur J Cancer. 2007 Jan;43(2):323-30
pubmed: 17156997
J Oncol Pract. 2015 Jan;11(1):e89-94
pubmed: 25466706
Am J Manag Care. 2014 May;20(5):393-400
pubmed: 25181568
Am J Manag Care. 2002 Dec;8(18 Suppl):S580-6
pubmed: 12512982
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Mar 15;16:94
pubmed: 26979458
J Oncol Pract. 2012 Jul;8(4):205-10
pubmed: 23180982
Eur J Cancer. 2013 Feb;49(3):541-4
pubmed: 23021062
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2010 Oct;14(5):619-25
pubmed: 20880819
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Jul 26;8:315
pubmed: 26210162
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Feb 28;7:31
pubmed: 17328807
JAMA. 2010 Jul 14;304(2):163-71
pubmed: 20628129
Support Care Cancer. 1998 Nov;6(6):518-23
pubmed: 9833300
Health Technol Assess. 2002;6(32):1-244
pubmed: 12925269
N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 30;359(18):1921-31
pubmed: 18971493
Ann Oncol. 2007 Nov;18(11):1887-92
pubmed: 17921245
Ann Surg. 2014 Oct;260(4):592-8; discussion 598-600
pubmed: 25203875
Psychosom Med. 1979 May;41(3):209-18
pubmed: 472086
J Adv Nurs. 2003 Jul;43(1):51-61
pubmed: 12801396
J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Dec;16(6):1129-35
pubmed: 21176003
Eur J Cancer. 2005 Sep;41(14):2120-31
pubmed: 16182120
Med Care. 2008 Nov;46(11):1157-62
pubmed: 18953226
Am J Manag Care. 2008 May;14(5):309-16
pubmed: 18488295
Int J Qual Health Care. 2006 Aug;18(4):266-74
pubmed: 16809400
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2009 Nov 03;3:287-304
pubmed: 19936172