Clinical Phase I/II Study: Local Disease Control and Survival in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Treated with Electrochemotherapy.
pancreatic cancer
planning
response assessment
reversible electroporation
variable geometry
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Mar 2021
22 Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
11
02
2021
revised:
15
03
2021
accepted:
16
03
2021
entrez:
3
4
2021
pubmed:
4
4
2021
medline:
4
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To assess local disease control rates (LDCR) and overall survival (OS) in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) treated with electrochemotherapy (ECT). Electrochemotherapy with bleomycin was performed in 25 LAPC patients who underwent baseline Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and/or Computed Tomography (CT) and Position Emission Tomography (PET) scans before ECT and 1 and 6 months post ECT. LDCR were assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) and Choi criteria. Needle electrodes with fixed linear (N-30-4B) or fixed hexagonal configurations (N-30-HG or I-40-HG or H-30-ST) or variable geometry (VGD1230 or VGD1240) (IGEA S.p.A., Carpi, Italy) were used to apply electric pulses. Pain evaluation was performed pre-ECT, after 1 month and after 6 months with ECT. Overall survival estimates were calculated by means of a Kaplan-Meier analysis. At 1 month after ECT, 76% of patients were in partial response (PR) and 20% in stable disease (SD). Six months after ECT, 44.0% patients were still in PR and 12.0% in SD. A LDCR of 56.0% was reached six months after ECT: 13 patients treated with fixed geometry had a LDCR of 46.1%, while for the 12 patients treated with variable geometry, the LDCR was 66.7%. The overall survival median value was 11.5 months: for patients treated with fixed geometry the OS was 6 months, while for patients treated with variable geometry it was 12 months. Electrochemotherapy was well-tolerated and abdominal pain was rapidly resolved. Electrochemotherapy obtained good results in terms of LDCR and OS in LAPC. Multiple needle insertion in a variable geometry configuration optimized by pre-treatment planning determined an increase in LDCR and OS compared to a fixed geometry configuration.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33810058
pii: jcm10061305
doi: 10.3390/jcm10061305
pmc: PMC8005134
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Biophys Chem. 1984 May;19(3):211-25
pubmed: 6722274
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 May;204(5):1000-7
pubmed: 25905934
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 May;46(5):811-817
pubmed: 31839436
Biophys J. 1974 Nov;14(11):881-99
pubmed: 4611517
Radiol Med. 2012 Oct;117(7):1242-9
pubmed: 22744358
J Membr Biol. 1972 Dec 29;10(3):279-90
pubmed: 4667921
Radiol Oncol. 2015 Mar 25;49(2):147-54
pubmed: 26029026
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011 May;22(5):611-21
pubmed: 21439847
Int J Surg. 2015 Sep;21 Suppl 1:S4-9
pubmed: 26118602
Curr Probl Cancer. 2013 Sep-Oct;37(5):262-5
pubmed: 24331180
EClinicalMedicine. 2019 Nov 19;17:100200
pubmed: 31891135
Oncologist. 2008;13 Suppl 2:4-7
pubmed: 18434631
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 01;8(11):e76260
pubmed: 24223700
Radiol Med. 2018 Jul;123(7):481-488
pubmed: 29508241
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jan 1;17:1533033818785329
pubmed: 29986632
Recenti Prog Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;104(7-8):420-4
pubmed: 24042421
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
Int J Surg. 2015 Sep;21 Suppl 1:S78-82
pubmed: 26123385
Int J Surg. 2015 Jun;18:230-6
pubmed: 25917204
Am J Clin Oncol. 2018 Mar;41(3):236-241
pubmed: 26796313
Front Oncol. 2020 Jan 22;10:6
pubmed: 32038984
Int J Pharm. 2012 Feb 14;423(1):3-6
pubmed: 21996516
Radiol Med. 2014 Feb;119(2):83-9
pubmed: 24277508
Radiol Med. 2011 Jun;116(4):595-606
pubmed: 21286942
Radiol Med. 2014 Jul;119(7):483-98
pubmed: 24981482
Biophys J. 1973 Jul;13(7):711-24
pubmed: 4715586
J Surg Oncol. 2011 Jul 1;104(1):22-8
pubmed: 21360714
Anticancer Drugs. 2000 Mar;11(3):201-8
pubmed: 10831279
Radiol Med. 2009 Apr;114(3):390-402
pubmed: 19266258
Radiology. 2014 Feb;270(2):416-24
pubmed: 24126371
Acta Oncol. 2018 Jul;57(7):874-882
pubmed: 29577784
Pancreatology. 2020 Apr;20(3):477-484
pubmed: 32131993
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Dec;76(6):1142-51
pubmed: 23021160
N Engl J Med. 2011 May 12;364(19):1817-25
pubmed: 21561347
Radiol Med. 2012 Dec;117(8):1275-86
pubmed: 23090249
Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1999 Jan 4;35(1):107-118
pubmed: 10837692
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Mar;196(3):W330-5
pubmed: 21343484
Semin Liver Dis. 2010 Feb;30(1):52-60
pubmed: 20175033
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017 Feb;29(Suppl 1):35-40
pubmed: 27837458
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012 Dec;39(12):1848-57
pubmed: 23053320
Radiol Med. 2016 Feb;121(2):122-31
pubmed: 26345332
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul 14;23(26):4767-4778
pubmed: 28765698
Radiol Med. 2013 Mar;118(2):163-80
pubmed: 22744342
Radiol Med. 2007 Oct;112(7):999-1012
pubmed: 17952679
Ann Surg. 2015 Sep;262(3):486-94; discussion 492-4
pubmed: 26258317
Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jun 6;14(1):95
pubmed: 31171025
Radiology. 2016 Aug;280(2):576-84
pubmed: 26909647
J Surg Oncol. 2014 Sep;110(3):320-7
pubmed: 24782355
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Apr 27;7(4):52-9
pubmed: 25914783
Acta Physiol Scand. 2003 Apr;177(4):437-47
pubmed: 12648161
Infect Agent Cancer. 2016 Nov 15;11:57
pubmed: 27891175
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Jan 13;2019:7683648
pubmed: 30733967
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Feb 7;23(5):906-918
pubmed: 28223736
HPB (Oxford). 2019 Aug;21(8):1024-1031
pubmed: 30737097
N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 31;369(18):1691-703
pubmed: 24131140
Med Oncol. 2020 Mar 31;37(5):38
pubmed: 32236847
CA Cancer J Clin. 2013 Jan;63(1):11-30
pubmed: 23335087
Radiol Med. 2010 Sep;115(6):898-905
pubmed: 20221707
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Oct 1;32(28):3144-55
pubmed: 25154827
Radiographics. 2013 Sep-Oct;33(5):1323-41
pubmed: 24025927