The Lègami/Legàmi Service-An Experience of Psychological Intervention in Maternal and Child Care during COVID-19.
COVID-19
difficulties
needs
psychological support
resources
Journal
Pediatric reports
ISSN: 2036-749X
Titre abrégé: Pediatr Rep
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101551542
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Mar 2021
22 Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
20
10
2020
revised:
29
12
2020
accepted:
16
03
2021
entrez:
3
4
2021
pubmed:
4
4
2021
medline:
4
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study provides a descriptive analysis of the Lègami/Legàmi service, a free psychological support service in maternal and childcare, offered through the internet and by telephone that was initiated by the Italian Society of Pediatric Psychology (S.I.P.Ped.) during the COVID-19 medical emergency as an act of solidarity, first independently, and then in collaboration with the Italian Ministry of Health. This paper presents findings related to the "universe" of people who called the toll-free service, from the sociocultural characteristics of the users to the information collected by the professionals during the psychological pathways until human satisfaction was achieved. We provide a retrospective description of an experience that took place between April and June 2020, and which involved users of the maternal-infant area calling from the whole Italy. (1) Methods: The aims of this study were to investigate the configuration of the indicators identified and to detect the possible correlations between them in the sample. There were 193 users who took advantage of the Service, 160 of whom continued beyond the reception service; it is this group that we report the findings from here. The tool used was a form reporting access to care and interventions, and the resulting data underwent a content analysis and the indicators were subject to non-parametric statistical analysis to analyze differences and relationships. (2) Results: There were many correlations among the indicators that revealed a high prevalence of calls due to personal motivations and requests for support, which later allowed users to gain a greater understanding of the underlying problems they were facing. The professionals running the service noticed a prevalence of weaknesses attributable to the negative emotions of its users, alongside a presence of cognitive and relational resources. The professionals' interventions, which can be characterized by a prevalence of social support, psychological rehabilitation, and psychoeducation, achieved outcomes of redefining users' relationships with themselves and others. All of the service's users have expressed a high level of satisfaction with it. (3) Discussion: Our results revealed the protective and transformative effects of the service for its users and the underlying importance of having an easily accessible psychological support system in place during emergencies, like the recent pandemic. In conditions like these, the great value of a remote support service should be noted, and despite its limitations, assures its own efficacy when a medical emergency precludes closer in-person forms of psychological assistance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33810190
pii: pediatric13010021
doi: 10.3390/pediatric13010021
pmc: PMC8006011
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
142-161Références
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Sep;40(19):2300-2310
pubmed: 28592203
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2021 Jan;120:105754
pubmed: 33281255
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 10;11:2177
pubmed: 33240140
Front Public Health. 2020 Jan 17;7:399
pubmed: 32010655
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Nov;293:113429
pubmed: 32882598
Ethics Med Public Health. 2021 Mar;16:100612
pubmed: 33283033
Child Abuse Negl. 2020 Dec;110(Pt 2):104699
pubmed: 32859394
J Psychosoc Rehabil Ment Health. 2020 Jun 26;:1-2
pubmed: 32837859
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Aug 09;19(8):e266
pubmed: 28793983
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 10;17(22):
pubmed: 33182661
Mem Cognit. 2019 Jan;47(1):63-75
pubmed: 30144002
Lancet. 2020 Mar 14;395(10227):912-920
pubmed: 32112714
Telemed J E Health. 2020 Apr;26(4):377-379
pubmed: 32202977
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 18;10(3):e0119895
pubmed: 25786025
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 03;11:1713
pubmed: 32719646
Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Oct;89:531-542
pubmed: 32485289
J Emerg Nurs. 2020 Jul;46(4):426-427
pubmed: 32418672
J Fam Violence. 2020 Jun 23;:1-7
pubmed: 32836736
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;7(10):851-864
pubmed: 32866459
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2011 Jan;20(1):67-79
pubmed: 21092913
Psychol Trauma. 2020 Aug;12(S1):S55-S57
pubmed: 32551762
Internet Interv. 2019 Aug 22;18:100268
pubmed: 31890621
Riv Psichiatr. 2020 May-Jun;55(3):137-144
pubmed: 32489190
Trials. 2018 Jan 22;19(1):56
pubmed: 29357918
Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2015 Oct-Dec;37(4):171-82
pubmed: 26689385
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 05;20(6):e202
pubmed: 29871855
JMIR Ment Health. 2016 Aug 17;3(3):e38
pubmed: 27535468
Nurs Outlook. 2020 Nov - Dec;68(6):830-837
pubmed: 32980152
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 31;9:2090
pubmed: 30429816
Lancet. 2020 Apr 11;395(10231):e64
pubmed: 32220657
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2016 Apr;26(3):235-45
pubmed: 26465266
J Clin Psychol. 2020 Jun;76(6):1060-1082
pubmed: 32285940
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 03;17(5):
pubmed: 32138360
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 02;11:567484
pubmed: 33132973
Psychiatr Danub. 2020 Spring;32(1):6-14
pubmed: 32303023
Prof Psychol Res Pr. 2014 Oct;45(5):309-315
pubmed: 25414540
N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 6;383(6):510-512
pubmed: 32283003