In defence of person-affecting procreative beneficence.

Beneficence Child Female Humans Moral Obligations Pregnancy Preimplantation Diagnosis Reproduction
benefit consequentialism harm procreative beneficence reproductive ethics selection

Journal

Bioethics
ISSN: 1467-8519
Titre abrégé: Bioethics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8704792

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2021
Historique:
revised: 13 02 2021
accepted: 12 03 2021
pubmed: 4 4 2021
medline: 25 11 2021
entrez: 3 4 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This paper deals with the proposal of a person-affecting version of the principle of Procreative Beneficence. Such a principle has been stated by Savulescu & Kahane in an impersonal form and balanced with a person-affecting principle of harm to address the moral problem of the selection of future children. The paper aims to show some differences between Person-affecting Procreative Beneficence and Savulescu & Kahane's hybrid position, and to distinguish the former from other pro-selection perspectives. Moreover, it explores the extension of such a principle beyond selection to other issues of reproductive ethics.

Identifiants

DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12872 PMID: 33811365
pubmed: 33811365
doi: 10.1111/bioe.12872
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

473-479

Informations de copyright

© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Auteurs

Sergio Filippo Magni (SF)

University of Pavia, Department of Humanities, Pavia, Italy.
ORCID: 0000-0002-9920-8033

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female

Evaluation of Low-Value Services Across Major Medicare Advantage Insurers and Traditional Medicare.

Ciara Duggan, Adam L Beckman, Ishani Ganguli et al.
1.00
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C

Effectiveness of Virtual Yoga for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Hallie Tankha, Devyn Gaskins, Amanda Shallcross et al.
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH

questionsmedicales.fr › Qualité, accès, évaluation des soins de santé › Éthique › Éthique basée sur les principes › Bienfaisance › In defence of person-affecting procreative beneficence.
questionsmedicales.fr › Personnes › Tranches d'âge › Enfant › In defence of person-affecting procreative beneficence.
questionsmedicales.fr › Eucaryotes › Animaux › Chordés › Vertébrés › Mammifères › Eutheria › Primates › Haplorhini › Catarrhini › Hominidae › Humains › In defence of person-affecting procreative beneficence.
questionsmedicales.fr › Sciences humaines › Philosophie › Sens moral › Responsabilité sociale › Obligations morales › In defence of person-affecting procreative beneficence.
questionsmedicales.fr › Phénomènes physiologiques des appareils urinaire et reproducteur › Phénomènes physiologiques de la reproduction › Reproduction › Grossesse › In defence of person-affecting procreative beneficence.
questionsmedicales.fr › Diagnostic › Techniques et procédures diagnostiques › Techniques de diagnostic gynécologique et obstétrique › Diagnostic préimplantatoire › In defence of person-affecting procreative beneficence.
questionsmedicales.fr › Phénomènes physiologiques des appareils urinaire et reproducteur › Phénomènes physiologiques de la reproduction › Reproduction › In defence of person-affecting procreative beneficence.