The management of acute knee dislocations: A global survey of orthopaedic surgeons' strategies.

Acute knee dislocation Management knee dislocation Multiligament knee injury

Journal

SICOT-J
ISSN: 2426-8887
Titre abrégé: SICOT J
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101675099

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 24 09 2020
accepted: 28 02 2021
entrez: 4 4 2021
pubmed: 5 4 2021
medline: 5 4 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Great variety and controversies surround the management strategies of acute multiligament knee injuries (aMKLIs) and no established guidelines exist for resource-limited practices. The aim of this study was to compare the management approach of acute knee dislocations (AKDs) by orthopedic surgeons from nations with different economic status. This descriptive cross-sectional scenario-based survey compares different management strategies for aMLKIs of surgeons in developed economic nations (DEN) and emerging markets and developing nations (EMDN). The main areas of focus were operative versus non-operative management, timing and staging of surgery, graft choice and vascular assessment strategies. The members of the Societe Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopedique et de Traumatologie (SICOT) were approached to participate and information was collected regarding their demographics, experience, hospital setting and management strategies of aMLKIs. These were analyzed after categorizing participants into DEN and EMDN based on the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita. One-hundred and thirty-eight orthopedic surgeons from 47 countries participated in this study, 67 from DEN and 71 (51.4%) from EMDN. DEN surgeons had more years of experience and were older (p < 0.05). Surgeons from EMDN mostly worked in public sector hospitals, were general orthopedic surgeons and treated patients from a low-income background. They preferred conservative management and delayed reconstruction with autograft (p < 0.05) if surgery was necessary. Surgeons from DEN favored early, single stage arthroscopic ligament reconstruction. Selective Computerized Tomography Angiography (CTA) was the most preferred choice of arterial examination for both groups. Significantly more EMDN surgeons preferred clinical examination (p < 0.05) and duplex doppler scanning (p < 0.05) compared to DEN surgeons. More surgeons from EMDN did not have access to a physiotherapist for their patients. Treatment of aMLKIs vary significantly based on the economic status of the country. Surgeons from DEN prefer early, single stage arthroscopic ligament reconstruction, while conservative management is favored in EMDN. Ligament surgery in EMDN is often delayed and staged. EMDN respondents utilize duplex doppler scanning and clinical examination more readily in their vascular assessment of aMLKIs. These findings highlight very distinct approaches to MLKIs in low-resource settings which are often neglected when guidelines are generated.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33812447
doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2021017
pii: sicotj200115
pmc: PMC8019554
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

21

Informations de copyright

© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2021.

Références

JBJS Rev. 2016 Feb 2;4(2):
pubmed: 27490131
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Jun;27(6):1782-1790
pubmed: 30874836
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1979 Oct;149(4):554-8
pubmed: 483133
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Mar 27;15:121
pubmed: 25880469
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 May;86(5):910-5
pubmed: 15118031
J Trauma. 2005 Sep;59(3):672-5; discussion 675-6
pubmed: 16361911
Orthop Rev. 1991 Nov;20(11):995-1004
pubmed: 1749665
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Sep;47(11):2563-2571
pubmed: 31381372
Lancet. 2015 Aug 8;386(9993):569-624
pubmed: 25924834
Phys Sportsmed. 1995 Nov;23(11):69-82
pubmed: 29278152
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Oct;39(10):2170-4
pubmed: 21757779
Am J Knee Surg. 2001 Winter;14(1):33-8
pubmed: 11216717
J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Feb;32(2):82-87
pubmed: 29065033
World J Orthop. 2014 Jan 18;5(1):23-9
pubmed: 24649411
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009 Apr;17(4):197-206
pubmed: 19307669
J Trauma. 1993 Dec;35(6):875-8
pubmed: 8263986
World J Surg. 2018 Dec;42(12):3849-3855
pubmed: 29947987
Arthroscopy. 2009 Apr;25(4):430-8
pubmed: 19341932
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Dec;91(12):2946-57
pubmed: 19952260
Knee. 2016 Mar;23(2):267-75
pubmed: 26545616
Arthroscopy. 2011 Sep;27(9):1219-25
pubmed: 21820267
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 May;(422):135-41
pubmed: 15187846
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Mar;76(3):715-9
pubmed: 24553539
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Sep;472(9):2621-9
pubmed: 24554457
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015 Dec;23(12):761-8
pubmed: 26493970

Auteurs

Santa-Marie Venter (SM)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Groote Schuur Hospital, Orthopedic Research Unit, University of Cape Town, Cape Town 7925, South Africa.

Roopam Dey (R)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Groote Schuur Hospital, Orthopedic Research Unit, University of Cape Town, Cape Town 7925, South Africa - Department of Human Biology, Division of Biomedical Engineering, University of Cape Town, Cape Town 7925, South Africa.

Vikas Khanduja (V)

Consultant Orthopedic Surgeon, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, United Kingdom.

Richard Pb von Bormann (RP)

Cape Town Sports and Orthopaedic Clinic, Christian Barnard Memorial Hospital, Cape Town, 8001, South Africa.

Michael Held (M)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Groote Schuur Hospital, Orthopedic Research Unit, University of Cape Town, Cape Town 7925, South Africa.

Classifications MeSH