Personalized alignment in total knee arthroplasty: current concepts.
Functional alignment
Implant survivorship
Kinematic alignment
Personalized alignment
Restricted alignment
Total knee arthroplasty
Journal
SICOT-J
ISSN: 2426-8887
Titre abrégé: SICOT J
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101675099
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
17
02
2021
accepted:
03
03
2021
entrez:
4
4
2021
pubmed:
5
4
2021
medline:
5
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Traditionally in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), a post-operative neutral alignment was the gold standard. This principle has been contested as functional outcomes were found to be inconsistent. Analysis of limb alignment in the non-osteoarthritic population reveals variations from neutral alignment and consideration of a personalized or patient-specific alignment in TKA is challenging previous concepts. The aim of this review was to clarify the variations of current personalized alignments and to report their results. Current personalized approaches of alignment reported are: kinematic, inverse kinematic, restricted kinematic, and functional. The principle of "kinematic alignment" is knee resurfacing with restitution of pre-arthritic anatomy. The aim is to resurface the femur maintaining the native femoral joint line obliquity. The flexion and extension gaps are balanced with the tibial resection. The principle of the "inverse kinematic alignment" is to resurface the tibia with similar medial and lateral bone resections in order to keep the native tibial joint line obliquity. Gap balancing is performed by adjusting the femoral resections. To avoid reproducing extreme anatomical alignments there is "restricted kinematic alignment" which is a compromise between mechanical alignment and true kinematic alignment with a defined safe zone of alignment. Finally, there is the concept of "functional alignment" which is an evolution of kinematic alignment as enabling technology has progressed. This is obtained by manipulating alignment, bone resections, soft tissue releases, and/or implant positioning with a robotic-assisted system to optimize TKA function for a patient's specific alignment, bone morphology, and soft tissue envelope. The aim of personalizing alignment is to restore native knee kinematics and improve functional outcomes after TKA. A long-term follow-up remains crucial to assess both outcomes and implant survivorship of these current concepts.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33812467
doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2021021
pii: sicotj210014
pmc: PMC8019550
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
19Informations de copyright
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2021.
Références
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Mar;471(3):1000-7
pubmed: 22996362
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jun;478(6):1271-1279
pubmed: 32039955
EFORT Open Rev. 2020 Oct 26;5(10):663-671
pubmed: 33204509
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 May;27(5):1368-1377
pubmed: 30989273
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Oct;21(10):2271-80
pubmed: 23948721
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985 Aug;67(4):551-6
pubmed: 4030849
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985 Jan-Feb;(192):23-33
pubmed: 3967427
J Orthop Res. 2009 Sep;27(9):1191-6
pubmed: 19242980
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 May;27(5):1450-1455
pubmed: 29846753
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Sep;19(9):1411-7
pubmed: 21598009
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Nov;103(7):1057-1067
pubmed: 28888523
J Knee Surg. 2018 Jan;31(1):27-37
pubmed: 29166681
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Feb;35(2):443-450
pubmed: 31591010
EFORT Open Rev. 2018 Jan 8;3(1):1-6
pubmed: 29657839
J Knee Surg. 2020 Mar 04;:
pubmed: 32131103
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Feb;33(2):398-406
pubmed: 29074324
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2010 Apr;18(1):22-5
pubmed: 20427828
Trials. 2020 Feb 18;21(1):194
pubmed: 32070406
J Knee Surg. 2019 Aug;32(8):742-749
pubmed: 30112739
Surg Technol Int. 2019 May 15;34:409-413
pubmed: 30742701
Acta Orthop. 2019 Dec;90(6):602-609
pubmed: 31610681
Bone Joint Res. 2017 Jan;6(1):43-51
pubmed: 28077396
Pain Res Manag. 2008 Jul-Aug;13(4):335-41
pubmed: 18719716
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Apr;27(4):1132-1141
pubmed: 30225554
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 May;27(5):1385-1393
pubmed: 30980119
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Nov;(428):26-34
pubmed: 15534515
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Nov;25(11):3467-3479
pubmed: 28439636
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Dec;33(12):3678-3684
pubmed: 30122435
J Knee Surg. 2021 Jan;34(1):87-93
pubmed: 31288274
Bone Joint J. 2018 Aug;100-B(8):1033-1042
pubmed: 30062950
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Jun 18;96(12):e101
pubmed: 24951744
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Jul 31;:
pubmed: 32737528
Bone Joint J. 2019 Aug;101-B(8):929-940
pubmed: 31362561
Bone Joint J. 2020 Jan;102-B(1):117-124
pubmed: 31888372
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Nov;103(7):1047-1056
pubmed: 28864235
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 May;27(5):1394-1402
pubmed: 30976825
J Arthroplasty. 2009 Sep;24(6 Suppl):39-43
pubmed: 19553073
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 May;27(5):1378-1384
pubmed: 30968238
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Jun;23(6):1841-7
pubmed: 24549262
SICOT J. 2020;6:18
pubmed: 32553101
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Feb;(299):153-6
pubmed: 8119010
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Apr;27(4):1142-1147
pubmed: 30220048
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jan;470(1):45-53
pubmed: 21656315
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jul;32(7):2133-2140
pubmed: 28302462
J Knee Surg. 2018 Jan;31(1):2-5
pubmed: 29179223
Bone Joint J. 2014 Jul;96-B(7):907-13
pubmed: 24986944
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 May;27(5):1359-1367
pubmed: 30848310