Handheld infrared thermometer to evaluate cellulitis: the HI-TEC study.
Cellulitis
Diagnosis
Erysipelas
Infrared thermometer
Pseudocellulitis
Journal
Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
ISSN: 1469-0691
Titre abrégé: Clin Microbiol Infect
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9516420
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
17
09
2020
revised:
17
02
2021
accepted:
14
03
2021
pubmed:
5
4
2021
medline:
13
1
2022
entrez:
4
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Differentiating cellulitis from pseudocellulitis is challenging, and misdiagnosis leads to unnecessary antimicrobial use and increased healthcare expenditure. Clinical diagnosis remains the criterion standard and may involve expert consultation. Our objective was to evaluate the usefulness of a handheld infrared thermometer to improve diagnostic certainty in cases of suspected cellulitis. We conducted a cross-sectional study from August 2018 to January 2020 at a tertiary-care hospital in Montreal, Canada. We enrolled adult patients with suspected limb cellulitis. Using the infrared thermometer, we compared the average temperature of the affected area with that of the contralateral limb, and we used Youden's method to determine the optimal temperature difference which best differentiated cellulitis from pseudocellulitis as determined by an independent and blinded infectious diseases specialist. We used bootstrapping to estimate 95% confidence intervals for the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating curve. Of 65 patients screened for enrolment, 52 patients were recruited (median age: 64 years, IQR 52-76); 39 of these were diagnosed with cellulitis and 13 were not. The mean temperature difference between affected and unaffected limbs was 2.6°C (95%CI 2.1-3.1°C) for patients with cellulitis and 0.4°C (95%CI -1.2°C to 2.1°C) for patients without (p < 0.001). An average temperature difference between limbs of 0.8°C or more was 95% sensitive (95%CI 74-100%) and 69% specific (95%CI 44-95%) for the diagnosis of cellulitis (c-statistic 0.82). In this proof-of-concept single-centre study, a handheld infrared thermometer was a useful aid to differentiate cellulitis from pseudocellulitis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33813124
pii: S1198-743X(21)00160-9
doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.03.025
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1814-1819Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.