Real-life Effectiveness of Afatinib


Journal

Anticancer research
ISSN: 1791-7530
Titre abrégé: Anticancer Res
Pays: Greece
ID NLM: 8102988

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2021
Historique:
received: 30 01 2021
revised: 17 02 2021
accepted: 18 02 2021
entrez: 4 4 2021
pubmed: 5 4 2021
medline: 28 4 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

We investigated efficacy differences for afatinib versus gefitinib in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) according to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. We retrospectively analysed data for 343 patients with NSCLC with performance status 1 having EGFR mutations treated with gefitinib or afatinib. Overall response rate (ORR) was tested by Fisher's exact test. Overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. ORR did not differ in any group or subgroup. Among all patients, we observed significantly longer PFS for those treated with afatinib vs. gefitinib (median 13.4 vs. 9.5 months, p=0.026), but only a nonsignificant trend was observed for OS. We showed nonsignificant trends of better PFS and OS using afatinib for exon 19 deletion and L858R subgroups. We observed no significant PFS differences for other EGFR mutations but a nonsignificant trend towards better OS for those treated with afatinib. Afatinib led to longer PFS for patients with common EGFR mutations but not for those with rare mutations.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND/AIM OBJECTIVE
We investigated efficacy differences for afatinib versus gefitinib in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) according to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations.
PATIENTS AND METHODS METHODS
We retrospectively analysed data for 343 patients with NSCLC with performance status 1 having EGFR mutations treated with gefitinib or afatinib. Overall response rate (ORR) was tested by Fisher's exact test. Overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS RESULTS
ORR did not differ in any group or subgroup. Among all patients, we observed significantly longer PFS for those treated with afatinib vs. gefitinib (median 13.4 vs. 9.5 months, p=0.026), but only a nonsignificant trend was observed for OS. We showed nonsignificant trends of better PFS and OS using afatinib for exon 19 deletion and L858R subgroups. We observed no significant PFS differences for other EGFR mutations but a nonsignificant trend towards better OS for those treated with afatinib.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Afatinib led to longer PFS for patients with common EGFR mutations but not for those with rare mutations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33813414
pii: 41/4/2059
doi: 10.21873/anticanres.14975
doi:

Substances chimiques

Afatinib 41UD74L59M
EGFR protein, human EC 2.7.10.1
ErbB Receptors EC 2.7.10.1
Gefitinib S65743JHBS

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2059-2065

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Martin Svaton (M)

Department of Pneumology and Phthisiology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic; svatonm@fnplzen.cz.

Monika Bratova (M)

Department of Respiratory Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.

Ondrej Fischer (O)

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.

Jana Krejci (J)

Department of Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery, Bulovka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.

Leona Koubkova (L)

Department of Pneumology, 2 Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.

Marketa Cernovska (M)

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Thomayer Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.

Michal Hrnciarik (M)

Department of Pneumology, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.

Milada Zemanova (M)

Department of Oncology, 1 Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.

Helena Coupkova (H)

Clinic of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.

Bedrich Porzer (B)

Department of Respiratory Medicine and Tuberculosis, Medical faculty, Ostrava University, Ostrava, Czech Republic.

Daniel Dolezal (D)

Department of Pneumology, Masaryk Hospital Usti nad Labem, Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic.

Tana Tuzova (T)

Department of Oncology, Jihlava Hospital, Jihlava, Czech Republic.

Karolina Hurdalkova (K)

Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Ltd., Brno, Czech Republic.

Magda Barinova (M)

Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Ltd., Brno, Czech Republic.

Jana Skrickova (J)

Department of Respiratory Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH