Robust Cortical Thickness Morphometry of Neonatal Brain and Systematic Evaluation Using Multi-Site MRI Datasets.
T1
cortical thickness
deformation
neonatal brain MRI
pial surface
Journal
Frontiers in neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-4548
Titre abrégé: Front Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101478481
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
06
01
2021
accepted:
17
02
2021
entrez:
5
4
2021
pubmed:
6
4
2021
medline:
6
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The human brain grows the most dramatically during the perinatal and early post-natal periods, during which pre-term birth or perinatal injury that may alter brain structure and lead to developmental anomalies. Thus, characterizing cortical thickness of developing brains remains an important goal. However, this task is often complicated by inaccurate cortical surface extraction due to small-size brains. Here, we propose a novel complex framework for the reconstruction of neonatal WM and pial surfaces, accounting for large partial volumes due to small-size brains. The proposed approach relies only on T1-weighted images unlike previous T2-weighted image-based approaches while only T1-weighted images are sometimes available under the different clinical/research setting. Deep neural networks are first introduced to the neonatal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) pipeline to address the mis-segmentation of brain tissues. Furthermore, this pipeline enhances cortical boundary delineation using combined models of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)/GM boundary detection with edge gradient information and a new skeletonization of sulcal folding where no CSF voxels are seen due to the limited resolution. We also proposed a systematic evaluation using three independent datasets comprising 736 pre-term and 97 term neonates. Qualitative assessment for reconstructed cortical surfaces shows that 86.9% are rated as accurate across the three site datasets. In addition, our landmark-based evaluation shows that the mean displacement of the cortical surfaces from the true boundaries was less than a voxel size (0.532 ± 0.035 mm). Evaluating the proposed pipeline (namely NEOCIVET 2.0) shows the robustness and reproducibility across different sites and different age-groups. The mean cortical thickness measured positively correlated with post-menstrual age (PMA) at scan (
Identifiants
pubmed: 33815050
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.650082
pmc: PMC8010150
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
650082Subventions
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : P41 EB015922
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : U01 NS086090
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : U19 AG024904
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : U54 EB020406
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Liu, Lepage, Kim, Jeon, Kim, Simon, Tanaka, Yuan, Islam, Peng, Arutyunyan, Surento, Kim, Jahanshad, Styner, Toga, Barkovich, Xu, Evans and Kim.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2013 Mar;35(3):611-23
pubmed: 22732662
Neuroinformatics. 2013 Apr;11(2):211-25
pubmed: 23055044
Cereb Cortex. 2015 Nov;25(11):4310-8
pubmed: 25596587
Neuroimage. 2006 Jun;31(2):572-84
pubmed: 16503170
Neuroimage. 2005 Aug 1;27(1):210-21
pubmed: 15896981
Med Image Anal. 2009 Apr;13(2):203-14
pubmed: 18996043
Cereb Cortex. 2011 Feb;21(2):300-6
pubmed: 20522538
J Neurosci. 2008 Nov 19;28(47):12176-82
pubmed: 19020011
Cereb Cortex. 2016 Jul;26(7):3023-35
pubmed: 26045567
Neuroimage. 2004 Nov;23(3):997-1012
pubmed: 15528100
Patch Based Tech Med Imaging (2016). 2016 Oct;9993:1-8
pubmed: 30246179
Int J Biomed Imaging. 2012;2012:870196
pubmed: 22481909
Neuroimage. 2018 Feb 15;167:104-120
pubmed: 29155184
Neuroimage. 2015 Mar;108:160-72
pubmed: 25541188
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jun 4;110(23):9541-6
pubmed: 23696665
Neuroimage. 2015 Oct 15;120:467-80
pubmed: 26070259
Neuroimage. 2015 Jul 15;115:64-75
pubmed: 25871628
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 10;10(7):e0131552
pubmed: 26161536
Neuroimage. 2009 Aug 15;47(2):564-72
pubmed: 19409502
PLoS Med. 2006 Aug;3(8):e265
pubmed: 16866579
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Aug;35(8):3726-37
pubmed: 24375724
Neuroimage. 2006 Feb 1;29(3):838-52
pubmed: 16269250
Dev Psychopathol. 2008 Fall;20(4):1161-75
pubmed: 18838036
J Neurosci. 2015 Jun 17;35(24):9150-62
pubmed: 26085637
Neuroimage. 2018 Jun;173:341-350
pubmed: 29501876
Neuroimage. 2018 Sep;178:540-551
pubmed: 29860082
J Neurosci. 2011 Aug 10;31(32):11597-616
pubmed: 21832190
Neuroimage. 2016 Jan 15;125:456-478
pubmed: 26499811
Neuroimage. 2010 Jan 1;49(1):391-400
pubmed: 19660558
Cereb Cortex. 2012 Jan;22(1):13-25
pubmed: 21571694
Front Neuroinform. 2016 Mar 29;10:12
pubmed: 27065840
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001 Sep-Oct;8(5):443-59
pubmed: 11522765
J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Oct;16(8):1412-25
pubmed: 15509387
Stroke. 2020 Feb;51(2):489-497
pubmed: 31884904
PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e59990
pubmed: 23565180
Neuroimage. 1999 Feb;9(2):179-94
pubmed: 9931268
Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 15;59(4):3805-20
pubmed: 22119005
J Neurosci. 2010 Feb 10;30(6):2268-76
pubmed: 20147553
Neuroimage. 2020 Sep;218:116946
pubmed: 32442637
Cereb Cortex. 2017 Mar 1;27(3):1795-1807
pubmed: 26874184
Neuron. 2011 Dec 8;72(5):873-84
pubmed: 22153381
Neuroimage. 2018 Jun;173:88-112
pubmed: 29409960
Cereb Cortex. 2012 May;22(5):1016-24
pubmed: 21772018
Neuroimage. 2009 Oct 15;48(1):63-72
pubmed: 19573611
Neuroimage. 2014 May 1;91:21-32
pubmed: 24473102
Med Image Anal. 2004 Sep;8(3):311-23
pubmed: 15450225
Brain. 2005 Nov;128(Pt 11):2588-96
pubmed: 16123146
Pediatrics. 1998 Jun;101(6):957-62
pubmed: 9606219
Cereb Cortex. 2020 Nov 3;30(12):6238-6253
pubmed: 32656563
Neuroimage. 2014 Apr 15;90:266-79
pubmed: 24374075
Neuroimage. 2000 Sep;12(3):340-56
pubmed: 10944416
PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27128
pubmed: 22110604
Neuroimage. 2006 May 15;31(1):31-8
pubmed: 16426865
Early Hum Dev. 2012 Feb;88(2):103-9
pubmed: 21839590
Neuroimage. 2019 Jan 15;185:906-925
pubmed: 29574033
Front Neuroanat. 2016 Feb 24;10:11
pubmed: 26941612
Sci Rep. 2017 May 19;7(1):2163
pubmed: 28526882
J Neurosci. 2011 May 11;31(19):7174-7
pubmed: 21562281
Neuroimage. 2018 Apr 15;170:231-248
pubmed: 28666878
Neuroimage. 2005 Jan 1;24(1):163-73
pubmed: 15588607
Neuroimage. 2016 Sep;138:28-42
pubmed: 27184202
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e42148
pubmed: 22860067
Med Image Anal. 2002 Jun;6(2):77-92
pubmed: 12044997
Neuroimage. 2007 Nov 15;38(3):461-77
pubmed: 17888685
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2014 Sep;33(9):1818-31
pubmed: 24816548
Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):774-81
pubmed: 22248573