Teams in Small Organizations: Conceptual, Methodological, and Practical Considerations.

methodology team composition team effectiveness team processes teams teamwork

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 30 01 2020
accepted: 01 03 2021
entrez: 5 4 2021
pubmed: 6 4 2021
medline: 6 4 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Research on teams and teamwork has flourished in the last few decades. Much of what we know about teams and teamwork comes from research using short-term student teams in the lab, teams in larger organizations, and, more recently, teams in rather unique and extreme environments. The context in which teams operate influences team composition, processes, and effectiveness. Small organizations are an understudied and often overlooked context that presents a rich opportunity to augment our understanding of teams and team dynamics. In this paper, we discuss how teams and multi-team systems in small organizations may differ from those found in larger organizations. Many of these differences present both methodological and practical challenges to studying team composition and processes in small complex organizational settings. We advocate for applying and accepting new and less widely used methodological approaches to advance our understanding of the science of teams and teamwork in such contexts.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33815183
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.530291
pmc: PMC8012669
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

530291

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Reiter-Palmon, Kennel and Allen.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Am Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;73(4):504-516
pubmed: 29792464
Psychol Bull. 1997 Jan;121(1):43-64
pubmed: 9000891
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Mar;94(2):535-46
pubmed: 19271807
Am Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;73(4):563-575
pubmed: 29792468
Am Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;73(4):349-362
pubmed: 29792453
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 05;9:2098
pubmed: 30455654
J Bus Psychol. 2018;33(3):325-344
pubmed: 29755202
Hum Factors. 2010 Apr;52(2):329-34
pubmed: 20942260
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jan;22(1):11-8
pubmed: 25053579
J Appl Psychol. 2000 Dec;85(6):971-86
pubmed: 11125660
J Appl Psychol. 2002 Feb;87(1):3-13
pubmed: 11916213
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2005 Oct;6(2):31-55
pubmed: 26158478
J Appl Psychol. 2007 May;92(3):595-615
pubmed: 17484544
Am Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;73(4):576-592
pubmed: 29792469
J Appl Psychol. 2000 Apr;85(2):273-83
pubmed: 10783543
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Nov;100(6):1811-24
pubmed: 26011723
J Appl Psychol. 2018 Mar;103(3):313-323
pubmed: 29094959
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Sep;92(5):1242-53
pubmed: 17845083
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2006 Dec;7(3):77-124
pubmed: 26158912

Auteurs

Roni Reiter-Palmon (R)

Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska Omaha, Omaha, NE, United States.

Victoria Kennel (V)

Department of Allied Health Professions Education, Research, and Practice, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.

Joseph A Allen (JA)

Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.

Classifications MeSH