A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial to Test the Efficacy of Intranasal Chlorpheniramine Maleate With Xylitol for the Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis.
allergy
chlorpheniramine maleate
rhinitis
xylitol
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 Mar 2021
31 Mar 2021
Historique:
entrez:
5
4
2021
pubmed:
6
4
2021
medline:
6
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The prevalence of allergic rhinitis (AR), including symptoms of sneezing, nasal itching, airflow obstruction, and nasal discharge caused by histamine and immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated reactions, is ~30% in the U.S. Recent studies seem to suggest that the allergic inflammatory processes in AR may be induced by the interaction between an allergen (trigger) and the nasal microbiome (substrate). In this study, we have identified two agents with antihistaminic and microbiome-modulating characteristics that can be administered intranasally, namely, chlorpheniramine maleate (CPM) and xylitol (X). This study aimed to test the efficacy of intranasal CPM plus xylitol (CPM+X) nasal for the treatment of AR in an outpatient setting. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 30-day pilot study was conducted during the spring of 2019. After starting five days of placebo therapy (run-in period), patients with moderate-to-severe AR nasal symptoms were randomized to treatment with CPM+X (n=16) spray and nasal saline placebo (PLB; n=13). Both treatments were administered in the form of one spray dose (~100 µL of the solution containing 1.25 mg CPM) per nostril twice a day. Outcome variables were the changes in visual analog scale (VAS) and daily symptoms score (DSS) at days 1, 5, 10, 15, 25, and 30 after the initiation of the treatment. ANOVA (analysis of variance) with repeated revealed a significant treatment-by-time interaction such that the CPM+X group had a significant decrease (p < 0.05) in both DSS (∆-3.0 ± 2.7) and VAS (∆-3.8 ± 2.0) scores compared to PLB after 30 days. The difference in DSS and VAS scores between the groups was evident just after five days (day 10) of using CPM+X. The CPM+X scores were significantly lower (p < 0.008) starting from day 10 compared with day 1, whereas there were no statistically significant (p > 0.008) changes in the PLB during the 30-day treatment window. The present data suggest that nasal CPM+X use effectively improves AR symptoms. A large-scale study of the long-term effects of CPM+X for the treatment of other chronic respiratory disorders and the potential microbiome-modulating effects warrants further investigation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33816038
doi: 10.7759/cureus.14206
pmc: PMC8010914
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e14206Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021, Sanchez-Gonzalez et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Biol Pharm Bull. 2016;39(4):540-6
pubmed: 27040626
Allergy. 2007 Apr;62(4):367-72
pubmed: 17362246
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 29;372(5):456-63
pubmed: 25629743
Front Immunol. 2018 Jul 17;9:1584
pubmed: 30065721
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1998 May;41(5):563-5
pubmed: 9630410
Int J Med Sci. 2017 Sep 30;14(12):1268-1275
pubmed: 29104484
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2017 Sep;7(9):889-896
pubmed: 28658521
Minerva Pediatr. 2020 Jul 29;:
pubmed: 32731730
J Assoc Physicians India. 2020 Apr;68(4):21-25
pubmed: 32610841
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995 Aug;39(8):1820-3
pubmed: 7486925
Front Microbiol. 2018 Nov 06;9:2643
pubmed: 30459739
Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2011 Mar;8(1):31-9
pubmed: 21364219
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2007 Jan-Feb;28(1):79-86
pubmed: 17390763
Biometrics. 1975 Mar;31(1):103-15
pubmed: 1100130
Laryngoscope. 2011 Nov;121(11):2468-72
pubmed: 21994147
World Allergy Organ J. 2012 Jan;5(Suppl 1):S14-7
pubmed: 23268478
Microb Cell Fact. 2020 Sep 1;19(1):171
pubmed: 32873292
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001 Apr;39(4):173-8
pubmed: 11332874
Am Fam Physician. 2010 Jun 15;81(12):1440-6
pubmed: 20540482