Rules of order: Evidence for a novel influence on ordinal processing of numbers.


Journal

Journal of experimental psychology. General
ISSN: 1939-2222
Titre abrégé: J Exp Psychol Gen
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7502587

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 6 4 2021
medline: 6 4 2021
entrez: 5 4 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Research on how people process numerical order carries implications for our theoretical understanding of what a number means and our practical understanding of the foundation upon which more sophisticated mathematics is built. Current thinking posits that ordinal processing of numbers is linked to repeated practice with the integer count list, but the mechanisms underlying this link remain unclear. For instance, in standard ordinal verification paradigms, participants more rapidly and accurately verify that count-list sequences (e.g., 3-4-5) are "in-order" than non-count-list sequences (e.g., 2-4-6), although it remains unclear whether this is due to strong count-list processing or poor non-count-list processing. If the count list primarily

Identifiants

pubmed: 33818119
pii: 2021-33514-001
doi: 10.1037/xge0001022
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2100-2116

Subventions

Organisme : Georgetown University; Departmental Start-Up Funds

Auteurs

Sylvia U Gattas (SU)

Department of Psychology.

Stephanie Bugden (S)

Department of Psychology.

Ian M Lyons (IM)

Department of Psychology.

Classifications MeSH