Decreased number of p16-positive senescent cells in human endometrium as a marker of miscarriage.
Abortion, Habitual
/ diagnosis
Adult
Bulgaria
/ epidemiology
Cellular Senescence
Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16
/ metabolism
Embryo Implantation
Embryo Transfer
/ methods
Endometrium
/ metabolism
Female
Fertilization in Vitro
/ methods
Humans
Infertility, Female
/ therapy
Live Birth
/ epidemiology
Middle Aged
Pregnancy
Prospective Studies
Young Adult
Cellular senescence
Human endometrium
Infertility
Miscarriage
p16+ cells
Journal
Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics
ISSN: 1573-7330
Titre abrégé: J Assist Reprod Genet
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9206495
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2021
Aug 2021
Historique:
received:
08
01
2021
accepted:
29
03
2021
pubmed:
7
4
2021
medline:
27
1
2022
entrez:
6
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the number of p16-positive cells in the functional layer of the endometrium could be a useful biomarker to identify women with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) at risk of miscarriage. Immunohistochemical staining was performed in 311 endometrial biopsies taken during mid-luteal phase using antibody against p16 We found that the percentages of p16-positive glandular and luminal epithelial endometrial cells were significantly higher in patients with live births compared to women with miscarriage (9.3% vs. 2.9%, P < 0.001; and 35.2% vs. 11.7%, P = 0.001, respectively). This tendency was not confirmed in thе stroma. The cut-off values with p16-positive luminal cells lower than 12.5% and p16-positive glandular cells lower than 3.2% could be predictive factors for miscarriage (AUC 0.80 and 0.79; sensitivity 71.3% and 74.5%; specificity 74.2% and 71.2%, respectively). A decreased number of senescent p16-positive cells could be involved in the implantation failures and aetiology of recurrent miscarriage. Women with history of RIF with reduced populations of p16-positive cells in the endometrial glandular and luminal epithelium may be at greater risk for unsuccessful implantation and miscarriage. The percentage of p16-positive luminal epithelial cells may be clinically useful as a biomarker of miscarriage.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33821427
doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02182-5
pii: 10.1007/s10815-021-02182-5
pmc: PMC8417180
doi:
Substances chimiques
CDKN2A protein, human
0
Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2087-2095Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Mod Pathol. 2010 May;23(5):763-72
pubmed: 20081803
Stem Cells. 2016 Feb;34(2):346-56
pubmed: 26418742
Nature. 2011 Nov 02;479(7372):232-6
pubmed: 22048312
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Aug;288(2):385-91
pubmed: 23435725
Adv Anat Pathol. 2006 Jan;13(1):8-15
pubmed: 16462152
Commun Biol. 2020 Jan 21;3(1):37
pubmed: 31965050
Reprod Biomed Online. 2018 May;36(5):524-542
pubmed: 29576332
Hum Reprod Update. 2017 Mar 1;23(2):166-187
pubmed: 27979878
Am J Epidemiol. 2006 Apr 1;163(7):670-5
pubmed: 16410346
Pathology. 2008 Jun;40(4):335-44
pubmed: 18446622
Fertil Steril. 2013 Sep;100(3):810-7
pubmed: 23725802
Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2003 Jul;22(3):231-5
pubmed: 12819388
Nature. 1995 Jun 8;375(6531):503-6
pubmed: 7777060
Fertil Steril. 1996 Mar;65(3):477-83
pubmed: 8774273
Biom J. 2005 Aug;47(4):428-41
pubmed: 16161802
Am J Surg Pathol. 2004 Feb;28(2):160-7
pubmed: 15043304
Hum Reprod. 2015 Dec;30(12):2816-28
pubmed: 26498179
Fertil Steril. 2017 Mar;107(3):723-730.e3
pubmed: 28139240
Virchows Arch. 2012 Aug;461(2):141-8
pubmed: 22772724
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Nov 3;20(1):663
pubmed: 33143675
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001 Aug;86(8):3912-7
pubmed: 11502832
Fertil Res Pract. 2019 Aug 5;5:9
pubmed: 31396393
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Dec 11;109(50):20596-601
pubmed: 23184984
Sheng Li Xue Bao. 2008 Aug 25;60(4):547-52
pubmed: 18690399
Fertil Steril. 2011 Sep;96(3):522-9
pubmed: 21880273
Elife. 2017 Dec 11;6:
pubmed: 29227245
Biom J. 2005 Aug;47(4):458-72
pubmed: 16161804
Nature. 1995 Jun 8;375(6531):506-10
pubmed: 7777061
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2016 Oct;32(sup2):33-36
pubmed: 27759459
J Neurooncol. 2001 Feb;51(3):219-29
pubmed: 11407594
J Immunol. 2018 Jul 15;201(2):325-334
pubmed: 29987001
Biol Reprod. 2020 Jun 23;103(1):104-113
pubmed: 32285109