Cost-effectiveness analysis of flucytosine as induction therapy in the treatment of cryptococcal meningitis in HIV-infected adults in South Africa.
5-flucytosine
Cost impact
Cost-effective
Cryptococcal meningitis
HIV
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Apr 2021
06 Apr 2021
Historique:
received:
26
01
2020
accepted:
10
03
2021
entrez:
7
4
2021
pubmed:
8
4
2021
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cryptococcal meningitis in HIV-infected patients in sub-Saharan Africa accounts for three-quarters of the global cases and 135,000 deaths per annum. Current treatment includes the use of fluconazole and amphotericin B. Recent evidence has shown that the synergistic use of flucytosine improves efficacy and reduces toxicity, however affordability and availability has hampered access to flucytosine in many countries. This study investigated the evidence and cost implications of introducing flucytosine as induction therapy for cryptococcal meningitis in HIV-infected adults in South Africa. A decision analytic cost-effectiveness and cost impact model was developed based on survival estimates from the ACTA trial and local costs for flucytosine as induction therapy in HIV-infected adults with cryptococcal meningitis in a public sector setting in South Africa. The model considered five treatment arms: (a) standard of care; 2-week course amphotericin B/fluconazole (2wk AmBd/Flu), (b) 2-week course amphotericin B/flucytosine (2wk AmBd/5FC), (c) short course; 1-week course amphotericin B/flucytosine (1wk AmBd/5FC) (d) oral course; 2-week oral fluconazole/flucytosine (oral) and e) 1-week course amphotericin B/fluconazole (1wk AmBd/Flu). A sensitivity analysis was conducted on key variables. The highest total treatment costs are in the 2-week AmBd/5FC arm followed by the 2-week oral regimen, the 1-week AmBd/5FC, then standard of care with the lowest cost in the 1-week AmBd/Flu arm. Compared to the lowest cost option the 1-week flucytosine course is most cost-effective at USD119/QALY. The cost impact analysis shows that the 1-week flucytosine course has an incremental cost of just over USD293 per patient per year compared to what is currently spent on standard of care. Sensitivity analyses suggest that the model is most sensitive to life expectancy and hospital costs, particularly infusion costs and length of stay. The addition of flucytosine as induction therapy for the treatment of cryptococcal meningitis in patients infected with HIV is cost-effective when it is used as a 1-week AmBd/5FC regimen. Savings could be achieved with early discharge of patients as well as a reduction in the price of flucytosine.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Cryptococcal meningitis in HIV-infected patients in sub-Saharan Africa accounts for three-quarters of the global cases and 135,000 deaths per annum. Current treatment includes the use of fluconazole and amphotericin B. Recent evidence has shown that the synergistic use of flucytosine improves efficacy and reduces toxicity, however affordability and availability has hampered access to flucytosine in many countries. This study investigated the evidence and cost implications of introducing flucytosine as induction therapy for cryptococcal meningitis in HIV-infected adults in South Africa.
METHODS
METHODS
A decision analytic cost-effectiveness and cost impact model was developed based on survival estimates from the ACTA trial and local costs for flucytosine as induction therapy in HIV-infected adults with cryptococcal meningitis in a public sector setting in South Africa. The model considered five treatment arms: (a) standard of care; 2-week course amphotericin B/fluconazole (2wk AmBd/Flu), (b) 2-week course amphotericin B/flucytosine (2wk AmBd/5FC), (c) short course; 1-week course amphotericin B/flucytosine (1wk AmBd/5FC) (d) oral course; 2-week oral fluconazole/flucytosine (oral) and e) 1-week course amphotericin B/fluconazole (1wk AmBd/Flu). A sensitivity analysis was conducted on key variables.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The highest total treatment costs are in the 2-week AmBd/5FC arm followed by the 2-week oral regimen, the 1-week AmBd/5FC, then standard of care with the lowest cost in the 1-week AmBd/Flu arm. Compared to the lowest cost option the 1-week flucytosine course is most cost-effective at USD119/QALY. The cost impact analysis shows that the 1-week flucytosine course has an incremental cost of just over USD293 per patient per year compared to what is currently spent on standard of care. Sensitivity analyses suggest that the model is most sensitive to life expectancy and hospital costs, particularly infusion costs and length of stay.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The addition of flucytosine as induction therapy for the treatment of cryptococcal meningitis in patients infected with HIV is cost-effective when it is used as a 1-week AmBd/5FC regimen. Savings could be achieved with early discharge of patients as well as a reduction in the price of flucytosine.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33823842
doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06268-9
pii: 10.1186/s12913-021-06268-9
pmc: PMC8025344
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antifungal Agents
0
Flucytosine
D83282DT06
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
305Références
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Apr;19(4):e143-e147
pubmed: 30344084
Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1684-1735
pubmed: 30496102
South Afr J HIV Med. 2019 Nov 08;20(1):1030
pubmed: 32201629
Bull World Health Organ. 2015 Feb 1;93(2):118-24
pubmed: 25883405
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018 Oct 23;5(11):ofy267
pubmed: 30488038
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 26;14(2):e0210497
pubmed: 30807573
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jan 16;70(3):521-524
pubmed: 31155650
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 26;12(10):e0186496
pubmed: 29073167
Value Health. 2016 Dec;19(8):929-935
pubmed: 27987642
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 25;7:CD005647
pubmed: 30045416
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Dec;59(12):7224-31
pubmed: 26349818
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jan 1;70(1):26-29
pubmed: 30816418
N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 15;378(11):1004-1017
pubmed: 29539274
Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Aug;17(8):873-881
pubmed: 28483415
S Afr Med J. 2010 Jun;100(6):378-82
pubmed: 20526411
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Dec;71(12):3599-3606
pubmed: 27516477
PLoS Med. 2012;9(9):e1001316
pubmed: 23055838
AIDS. 2016 Oct 23;30(16):2545-2550
pubmed: 27428744
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Jul 28;10(7):e0004865
pubmed: 27467556
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Aug 1;69(4):588-595
pubmed: 30863852
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Jun 15;62(12):1564-8
pubmed: 27009249
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009 Jun 1;51(2):130-4
pubmed: 19365271