Topical Review: Assessment of Binocular Sensory Processes in Low Vision.
Journal
Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry
ISSN: 1538-9235
Titre abrégé: Optom Vis Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8904931
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 04 2021
01 04 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
9
4
2021
medline:
10
7
2021
entrez:
8
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This article summarizes the evidence for a higher prevalence of binocular vision dysfunctions in individuals with vision impairment. Assessment for and identification of binocular vision dysfunctions can detect individuals experiencing difficulties in activities including reading, object placement tasks, and mobility.Comprehensive vision assessment in low vision populations is necessary to identify the extent of remaining vision and to enable directed rehabilitation efforts. In patients with vision impairment, little attention is typically paid to assessments of binocular vision, including ocular vergence, stereopsis, and binocular summation characteristics. In addition, binocular measurements of threshold automated visual fields are not routinely performed in clinical practice, leading to an incomplete understanding of individuals' binocular visual field and may affect rehabilitation outcomes.First, this review summarizes the prevalence of dysfunctions in ocular vergence, stereopsis, and binocular summation characteristics across a variety of ocular pathologies causing vision impairment. Second, this review examines the links between clinical measurements of binocular visual functions and outcome measures including quality of life and performance in functional tasks. There is an increased prevalence of dysfunctions in ocular alignment, stereopsis, and binocular summation across low vision cohorts compared with those with normal vision. The identification of binocular vision dysfunctions during routine low vision assessments is especially important in patients experiencing difficulties in activities of daily living, including but not limited to reading, object placement tasks, and mobility. However, further research is required to determine whether addressing the identified deficits in binocular vision in low vision rehabilitative efforts directly impacts patient outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33828038
doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001672
pii: 00006324-202104000-00002
pmc: PMC8051935
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
310-325Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Optometry.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of Interest Disclosure: JT, MK, and AL receive salary support from Guide Dogs New South Wales/Australian Capital Territory, and JM is an employee of Guide Dogs New South Wales/Australian Capital Territory. JH and VK are recipients of Australian Government Research Training Program scholarships and PhD scholarships provided by Guide Dogs New South Wales/Australian Capital Territory. Guide Dogs New South Wales/Australian Capital Territory played no role in the conceptualization of this article, and the authors have no proprietary interest in any of the materials mentioned in this article.
Références
Tseng VL, Coleman AL. Reducing the Burden of Unilateral Vision Impairment and Blindness in Australia. JAMA Ophthalmol 2018;136:248–9.
Lamoureux EL, Hassell JB, Keeffe JE. The Determinants of Participation in Activities of Daily Living in People with Impaired Vision. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;137:265–70.
West SK, Rubin GS, Broman AT, et al. How Does Visual Impairment Affect Performance on Tasks of Everyday Life? Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:774–80.
Cypel MC, Salomao SR, Dantas PEC, et al. Vision Status, Ophthalmic Assessment, and Quality of Life in the Very Old. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2017;80:159–64.
World Health Organization. World Report on Vision. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2019.
Bourne RR, Flaxman SR, Braithwaite T, et al. Magnitude, Temporal Trends, and Projections of the Global Prevalence of Blindness and Distance and Near Vision Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2017;5:e888–97.
O'Connor P, Keeffe J. Focus on Low Vision. Melbourne, Australia: Centre for Eye Research; 2007.
Haegerstrom-Portnoy G, Schneck ME, Brabyn JA. Seeing into Old Age: Vision Function beyond Acuity. Optom Vis Sci 1999;76:141–58.
Horowitz A. The Prevalence and Consequences of Vision Impairment in Later Life. Top Geriatr Rehabil 2004;20:185–95.
Binns AM, Bunce C, Dickinson C, et al. How Effective Is Low Vision Service Provision? A Systematic Review. Surv Ophthalmol 2012;57:34–65.
Wittich W, Canuto A, Overbury O. Overcoming Barriers to Low-vision Rehabilitation Services: Improving the Continuum of Care. Can J Ophthalmol 2013;48:463–7.
Wolffsohn J, Cochrane AL. Design of the Low Vision Quality-of-life Questionnaire (LVQOL) and Measuring the Outcome of Low-vision Rehabilitation. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;130:793–802.
Markowitz SN. Principles of Modern Low Vision Rehabilitation. Can J Ophthalmol 2006;41:289–312.
Wilkinson ME, Shahid KS. Low Vision Rehabilitation: An Update. Saudi J Ophthalmol 2018;32:134–8.
Gordon K, Bonfanti A, Pearson V, et al. Comprehensive Vision Rehabilitation. Can J Ophthalmol 2015;50:85–6.
Kalloniatis M, Johnston AW. Visual Characteristics of Low Vision Children. Optom Vis Sci 1990;67:38–48.
Rundström MM, Eperjesi F. Is There a Need for Binocular Vision Evaluation in Low Vision? Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1995;15:525–8.
Uzdrowska M, Crossland M, Broniarczyk-Loba A. Is Binocular Vision Worth Considering in People with Low Vision? Klin Oczna 2014;116:49–51.
Kalloniatis M, Luu C. Space perception. In: Kolb H, Fernandez E, Nelson R, eds. The Organization of the Retina and Visual System. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Health Sciences Center; 2005.
Sheedy JE, Saladin JJ. Association of Symptoms with Measures of Oculomotor Deficiencies. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1978;55:670–6.
Cacho-Martinez P, Canto-Cerdan M, Carbonell-Bonete S, et al. Characterization of Visual Symptomatology Associated with Refractive, Accommodative, and Binocular Anomalies. J Ophthalmol 2015;2015:895803.
Miyata M, Oishi A, Ogino K, et al. Relationship between Ocular Deviation and Visual Function in Retinitis Pigmentosa. Sci Rep 2018;8:14880.
Tarita-Nistor L, Brent MH, Steinbach MJ, et al. Fixation Patterns in Maculopathy: From Binocular to Monocular Viewing. Optom Vis Sci 2012;89:277–87.
Goldstein JH, Clahane AC. The Role of the Periphery in Binocular Vision. Am J Ophthalmol 1966;62:702–6.
Migliorini R, Comberiati AM, Galeoto G, et al. Eye Motility Alterations in Retinitis Pigmentosa. J Ophthalmol 2015;2015:145468.
Skrbek M. Binocular Refraction in Patients with Age-related Macular Degeneration. Coll Antropol 2013;37:153–6.
Reche-Sainz JA, Gómez de Liaño R, Toledano-Fernández N, et al. Binocular Vision in Glaucoma. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2013;88:174–8.
Rosenberg R, Faye E, Fischer M, et al. Role of Prism Relocation in Improving Visual Performance of Patients with Macular Dysfunction. Optom Vis Sci 1989;66:747–50.
Verezen CA, Volker-Dieben HJ, Hoyng CB. Eccentric Viewing Spectacles in Everyday Life, for the Optimum Use of Residual Functional Retinal Areas, in Patients with Age-related Macular Degeneration. Optom Vis Sci 1996;73:413–7.
Al-Karmi R, Markowitz SN. Image Relocation with Prisms in Patients with Age-related Macular Degeneration. Can J Ophthalmol 2006;41:313–8.
Verezen CA, Meulendijks CFM, Hoyng CB, et al. Long-term Evaluation of Eccentric Viewing Spectacles in Patients with Bilateral Central Scotomas. Optom Vis Sci 2006;83:88–95.
Giaschi D, Narasimhan S, Solski A, et al. On the Typical Development of Stereopsis: Fine and Coarse Processing. Vision Res 2013;89:65–71.
Pardhan S, Scarfe A, Bourne R, et al. A Comparison of Reach-to-grasp and Transport-to-place Performance in Participants with Age-related Macular Degeneration and Glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2017;58:1560–9.
O'Connor AR, Tidbury LP. Stereopsis: Are We Assessing It in Enough Depth? Clin Exp Optom 2018;101:485–94.
Levi DM, Knill DC, Bavelier D. Stereopsis and Amblyopia: A Mini-review. Vision Res 2015;114:17–30.
Mitchell D. A Review of the Concept of “Panum's Fusional Areas”. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1966;43:387–401.
Wallace DK, Lazar EL, Melia M, et al. Stereoacuity in Children with Anisometropic Amblyopia. J AAPOS 2011;15:455–61.
Odell NV, Hatt SR, Leske DA, et al. The Effect of Induced Monocular Blur on Measures of Stereoacuity. J AAPOS 2009;13:136–41.
Larson WL, Bolduc M. Effect of Induced Blur on Visual Acuity and Stereoacuity. Optom Vis Sci 1991;68:294–8.
Vingolo EM, Limoli PG, Steigerwalt RD Jr., et al. Abnormal Stereopsis and Reduced Retinal Sensitivity in Patients with Retinitis Pigmentosa. Int Ophthalmol 2020;40:179–84.
Lin S, Mihailovic A, West SK, et al. Predicting Visual Disability in Glaucoma with Combinations of Vision Measures. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2018;7:22.
Lakshmanan Y, George RJ. Stereoacuity in Mild, Moderate and Severe Glaucoma. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2013;33:172–8.
Nelson P, Aspinall P, Papasouliotis O, et al. Quality of Life in Glaucoma and Its Relationship with Visual Function. J Glaucoma 2003;12:139–50.
Cao KY, Markowitz SN. Residual Stereopsis in Age-related Macular Degeneration Patients and Its Impact on Vision-related Abilities: A Pilot Study. J Optom 2014;7:100–5.
Tabrett DR, Latham K. Factors Influencing Self-reported Vision-related Activity Limitation in the Visually Impaired. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:5293–302.
Verghese P, Tyson TL, Ghahghaei S, et al. Depth Perception and Grasp in Central Field Loss. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2016;57:1476–87.
Kotecha A, O'Leary N, Melmoth D, et al. The Functional Consequences of Glaucoma for Eye-hand Coordination. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50:203–13.
Lamoureux E, Gadgil S, Pesudovs K, et al. The Relationship between Visual Function, Duration and Main Causes of Vision Loss and Falls in Older People with Low Vision. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2010;248:527–33.
Lord SR, Dayhew J. Visual Risk Factors for Falls in Older People. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001;49:508–15.
Ivers RQ, Norton R, Cumming RG, et al. Visual Impairment and Risk of Hip Fracture. Am J Epidemiol 2000;152:633–9.
Chew FL, Yong CK, Ayu SM, et al. The Association between Various Visual Function Tests and Low Fragility Hip Fractures among the Elderly: A Malaysian Experience. Age Ageing 2010;39:185–91.
Timmis MA, Pardhan S. Patients with Central Visual Field Loss Adopt a Cautious Gait Strategy during Tasks That Present a High Risk of Falling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53:4120–9.
Lord SR. Visual Risk Factors for Falls in Older People. Age Ageing 2006;35(Suppl. 2):ii42–5.
Tarita-Nistor L, Gonzalez EG, Markowitz SN, et al. Binocular Function in Patients with Age-related Macular Degeneration: A Review. Can J Ophthalmol 2006;41:327–32.
Schneck ME, Haegerstrom-Portnoy G, Lott LA, et al. Monocular vs. Binocular Measurement of Spatial Vision in Elders. Optom Vis Sci 2010;87:526–31.
Gagnon RW, Kline DW. Senescent Effects on Binocular Summation for Contrast Sensitivity and Spatial Interval Acuity. Curr Eye Res 2003;27:315–21.
Valberg A, Fosse P. Binocular Contrast Inhibition in Subjects with Age-related Macular Degeneration. J Opt Soc Am (A) 2002;19:223–8.
Tarita-Nistor L, Gonzalez EG, Markowitz SN, et al. Binocular Interactions in Patients with Age-related Macular Degeneration: Acuity Summation and Rivalry. Vision Res 2006;46:2487–98.
Kabanarou SA, Rubin G. Reading with Central Scotomas: Is There a Binocular Gain? Optom Vis Sci 2006;83:798–6.
Tzaridis S, Herrmann P, Charbel Issa P, et al. Binocular Inhibition of Reading in Macular Telangiectasia Type 2. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2019;60:3835–41.
Rubin GS, Munoz B, Bandeen-Roche K, et al. Monocular versus Binocular Visual Acuity as Measures of Vision Impairment and Predictors of Visual Disability. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:3327–34.
Tarita-Nistor L, Brent MH, Markowitz SN, et al. Maximum Reading Speed and Binocular Summation in Patients with Central Vision Loss. Can J Ophthalmol 2013;48:443–9.
Silvestri V, Sasso P, Piscopo P, et al. Reading with Central Vision Loss: Binocular Summation and Inhibition. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2020;40:778–89.
Faubert J, Overbury O. Binocular Vision in Older People with Adventitious Visual Impairment: Sometimes One Eye Is Better Than Two. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000;48:375–80.
Gonzalez EG, Markowitz M, Steinbach MJ. Vision Loss from Macular Degeneration: An Optimal Way to Measure What Remains. Poster presented at the University Health Network Research Day; October 31, 2004; Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
McElvanney A, Moseley MJ, Jones HJ. Binocular Inhibition of Visual Performance in Patients with Cataract. The Influence of Test Reliability. Acta Ophthalmol 1994;72:606–11.
Pineles SL, Birch EE, Talman LS, et al. One Eye or Two: A Comparison of Binocular and Monocular Low-contrast Acuity Testing in Multiple Sclerosis. Am J Ophthalmol 2011;152:133–40.
Waldman AT, Hiremath G, Avery RA, et al. Monocular and Binocular Low-contrast Visual Acuity and Optical Coherence Tomography in Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2013;3:326–34.
Pham C, Sheth SJ, Keeffe JE, et al. New Trends in Childhood Vision Impairment in a Developed Country. J AAPOS 2017;21:496–8.
Chong C, McGhee CNJ, Dai SH. Causes of Childhood Low Vision and Blindness in New Zealand. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2019;47:165–70.
Decarlo DK, McGwin G Jr., Bixler ML, et al. Impact of Pediatric Vision Impairment on Daily Life: Results of Focus Groups. Optom Vis Sci 2012;89:1409–16.
Achiron LR, Witkin NS, McCarey B, et al. The Illuminated High Contrast Macular Grid: A Pilot Study. J Am Optom Assoc 1995;66:693–7.
Bron AM, Viswanathan AC, Thelen U, et al. International Vision Requirements for Driver Licensing and Disability Pensions: Using a Milestone Approach in Characterization of Progressive Eye Disease. Clin Ophthalmol 2010;4:1361–9.
Silveira S, Jolly N, Heard R, et al. Current Licensing Authority Standards for Peripheral Visual Field and Safe On-road Senior Aged Automobile Driving Performance. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2007;35:612–20.
Jampel HD, Schwartz A, Pollack I, et al. Glaucoma Patients' Assessment of Their Visual Function and Quality of Life. J Glaucoma 2002;11:154–63.
Noe G, Ferraro J, Lamoureux E, et al. Associations between Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss and Participation in Activities of Daily Living. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2003;31:482–6.
Musch DC, Niziol LM, Gillespie BW, et al. Binocular Measures of Visual Acuity and Visual Field versus Binocular Approximations. Ophthalmology 2017;124:1031–8.
Xu J, Lu P, Dai M, et al. The Relationship between Binocular Visual Field Loss and Various Stages of Monocular Visual Field Damage in Glaucoma Patients. J Glaucoma 2019;28:42–50.
Tabrett DR, Latham K. Important Areas of the Central Binocular Visual Field for Daily Functioning in the Visually Impaired. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2012;32:156–63.
Nelson-Quigg JM, Cello K, Johnson C. Predicting Binocular Visual Field Sensitivity from Monocular Visual Field Results. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:2212–21.
Crabb DP, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA, et al. A Practical Approach to Measuring the Visual Field Component of Fitness to Drive. Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88:1191–6.
Crabb DP, Viswanathan AC. Integrated Visual Fields: A New Approach to Measuring the Binocular Field of View and Visual Disability. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2005;243:210–6.
Chisholm CM, Rauscher FG, Crabb DC, et al. Assessing Visual Fields for Driving in Patients with Paracentral Scotomata. Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:225–30.
Crabb DP, Viswanathan AC, McNaught AI, et al. Simulating Binocular Visual Field Status in Glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1998;82:1236–41.
Bozzani FM, Alavi Y, Jofre-Bonet M, et al. A Comparison of the Sensitivity of EQ-5D, SF-6D and TTO Utility Values to Changes in Vision and Perceived Visual Function in Patients with Primary Open-angle Glaucoma. BMC Ophthalmol 2012;12:43.
Chun YS, Sung KR, Park CK, et al. Vision-related Quality of Life According to Location of Visual Field Loss in Patients with Glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol 2019;97:e772–9.
Subhi H, Latham K, Myint J, et al. Functional Visual Fields: A Cross-sectional UK Study to Determine Which Visual Field Paradigms Best Reflect Difficulty with Mobility Function. BMJ Open 2017;7:e018831.
Murata H, Hirasawa H, Aoyama Y, et al. Identifying Areas of the Visual Field Important for Quality of Life in Patients with Glaucoma. PLoS One 2013;8:e58695.
Yamazaki Y, Sugisaki K, Araie M, et al. Relationship between Vision-related Quality of Life and Central 10 Degrees of the Binocular Integrated Visual Field in Advanced Glaucoma. Sci Rep 2019;9:14990.
Turano K, Broman AT, Bandeen-Roche K, et al. Association of Visual Field Loss and Mobility Performance in Older Adults: Salisbury Eye Evaluation Study. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81:298–307.
Black AA, Wood JM, Lovie-Kitchin JA, et al. Visual Impairment and Postural Sway among Older Adults with Glaucoma. Optom Vis Sci 2008;85:489–97.
Kotecha A, Richardson G, Chopra R, et al. Balance Control in Glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53:7795–801.
Ramulu PY, Mihailovic A, West SK, et al. Predictors of Falls per Step and Falls per Year at and Away from Home in Glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2019;200:169–78.
Subhi H, Latham K, Myint J, et al. Functional Visual Fields: Relationship of Visual Field Areas to Self-reported Function. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2017;37:399–408.
Fletcher DC, Schuchard RA, Renninger LW. Patient Awareness of Binocular Central Scotoma in Age-related Macular Degeneration. Optom Vis Sci 2012;89:1395–8.
Kabanarou SA, Crossland MD, Bellmann C, et al. Gaze Changes with Binocular versus Monocular Viewing in Age-related Macular Degeneration. Ophthalmology 2006;113:2251–8.
Tarita-Nistor L, Eizenman M, Landon-Brace N, et al. Identifying Absolute Preferred Retinal Locations during Binocular Viewing. Optom Vis Sci 2015;92:836–72.
Timberlake GT, Omoscharka E, Quaney BM, et al. Effect of Bilateral Macular Scotomas from Age-related Macular Degeneration on Reach-to-grasp Hand Movement. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:2540–50.
Glen FC, Crabb DP, Smith ND, et al. Do Patients with Glaucoma Have Difficulty Recognizing Faces? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53:3629–37.
Wallis TSA, Taylor CP, Wallis H, et al. Characterization of Field Loss Based on Microperimetry Is Predictive of Face Recognition Difficulties. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013;55:142–53.
Tejeria L, Harper RA, Artes PH, et al. Face Recognition in Age Related Macular Degeneration: Perceived Disability, Measured Disability, and Performance with a Bioptic Device. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:1019–26.
Lamoureux EL, Tai ES, Thumboo J, et al. Impact of Diabetic Retinopathy on Vision-specific Function. Ophthalmology 2010;117:757–65.
Fenwick EK, Pesudovs K, Rees G, et al. The Impact of Diabetic Retinopathy: Understanding the Patient's Perspective. Br J Ophthalmol 2011;95:774–82.