Message Framing Effects on Individuals' Social Distancing and Helping Behavior During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

COVID-19 experiment helping message framing prosocial motives self-interested motives social distancing and stay-at-home orders

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 01 07 2020
accepted: 16 02 2021
entrez: 8 4 2021
pubmed: 9 4 2021
medline: 9 4 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This research responds to urgent calls to fill knowledge gaps on COVID-19 (new coronavirus) in communicating social distancing messages to the public in the most convincing ways. The authors explore the effectiveness of framing social distancing messages around prosocial vs. self-interested appeals in driving message compliance and helping behavior. The results show that when a message emphasizes benefits for everyone in society, rather than solely for the individual, citizens find the message more persuasive to engage in social distancing, and also more motivating to help others. The results further demonstrate that the proposed effects are higher for individuals who have a lower locus of control and lower fear of coronavirus as prosocial messages lead them to feel a joint responsibility in protecting from the pandemic. Theoretical and practical implications of the results are discussed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33828501
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.579164
pmc: PMC8019916
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

579164

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Ceylan and Hayran.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):1969-1973
pubmed: 32227757
Med Decis Making. 2012 May-Jun;32(3):447-58
pubmed: 22127841
J Consum Res. 1977 Dec;4(3):131-40
pubmed: 11663294
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Mar;98(3):392-404
pubmed: 20175620
Int J Ment Health Addict. 2020 Mar 27;:1-9
pubmed: 32226353
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 26;11(7):e0159780
pubmed: 27459237
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997 Sep;73(3):481-94
pubmed: 9294898
Health Commun. 2016 Oct;31(10):1284-90
pubmed: 26940483
Front Psychol. 2017 Nov 01;8:1906
pubmed: 29163287
Psychol Methods. 2002 Dec;7(4):422-45
pubmed: 12530702
Multivariate Behav Res. 1995 Jan 1;30(1):41
pubmed: 20157641
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Feb 15;170:110420
pubmed: 33082614
Psychol Monogr. 1966;80(1):1-28
pubmed: 5340840
Psychol Sci. 2020 Nov;31(11):1363-1373
pubmed: 32993455
Lancet. 2020 May 30;395(10238):1676-1678
pubmed: 32380042
Sex Transm Dis. 2009 Jan;36(1):58-62
pubmed: 18830138
Int J Ment Health Addict. 2020 Apr 27;:1-14
pubmed: 32346359
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Sep;95(3):524-41
pubmed: 18729692
Psychol Sci. 2011 Dec;22(12):1494-9
pubmed: 22075239
Emerg Infect Dis. 2006 Nov;12(11):1671-81
pubmed: 17283616
Pediatrics. 2014 Sep;134(3):e675-83
pubmed: 25136038

Auteurs

Melis Ceylan (M)

Faculty of Business Administration, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey.

Ceren Hayran (C)

School of Business, Ozyegin University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Classifications MeSH